• AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would love to have a good pair of ar glasses to play games on my Steam Deck with. Connect a controller, and not have to hold up the heavy Deck itself.

    But given Apple’s propensity for walled gardens and lock-in, and Meta putting manipulative spyware into everything they make, these hypothetical glasses won’t be coming from either of those companies.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, maybe of ots done well. I have the meta raybans and love them, mainly because I can listen to music as if I had earphones in, and talk on my phone with them, record, and take videos.

      If it had a UI to select options and could display info too, that would be pretty sick imo.

      • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m curious what drives you to record videos using the glass. As opposed to a phone/camera, the POV is very restricted as you cannot move vertically (unless kneel/crawl and look up/down ofc). So I’m sure it cannot be called a replacement to a traditional phone/camera.

        So what is your motivation to use it ?

        • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Actually I never record videos and rarely take pictures with them. It’s the feature i use the least.

          I use them for music, phone calls, and AI requests (like having a Google home you can ask at any moment). Once and a while I’ll ask it to tell me what I’m looking at to listen to it describe something. That feature uses the camera to snap a shot of what your looking at.

          When I walk somewhere and need to use maps, it tells the directions to me as I walk which is pretty neat.

  • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    They would have to be so good to be what these guys want them to be and the technology is just not there yet.

  • Imperor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me. There are so few real applications and the hardware requirements are insane so it’s not something that will get widely adapted anyway. Sure in a decade or so it might have matured enough to have shed all these issues, but AR/VR feels like a really out of touch thing to prusue, especially if you look at the garbage ideas they have on how to use it - virtual meetings??

    I get movies and games on these, possibly even some recording and porn, but these are not their B2B wet dreams anyway.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But think of the constant, total surveillance opportunity for Apple, and how this could help them win favor and contracts from the fascist US government!

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the fundamental problem with the AR glasses is something that can’t be overcome.

    I think its easy to see the utility to owning a pair of glasses that look good and provide real time information as desired for what you are looking at or hearing.

    HOWEVER, I think very few people will want the product these co.panies will make. This will be a method to throw ads literally in front of your eyeballs. Enshitification is too big of a thing now and so any new product is tainted by the expectation it will rapidly turn to garbage at a high price to you.

    Also, while we may think we can be trusted, we dont trust anyone else having all that info, I dont like the obvious privacy implications that these can present. Filming with them is also terrifying.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Being able to keep a screen in front of the user at all times is the goal. This is one step closer to replacing the eyes Cyberpunk style.

    This is why Siri and Apple Intelligence is so important to Apple, getting away an actual keyboard will make this more addicting. They can decide what to show you before you even start thinking about it!

    Corporations would love being able to not only know where you are at all times, but now they have the tech to see exactly what you see!

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this is a case where the imagination is much, much better than the reality.

    For the mobilization of technology, miniaturization has had a lot of benefits, not just in the technology, but in the accessibility. Having a desktop computer instead of a mainframe was huge. It brought the computer to the home. Laptops becoming viable was huge again. It untethered the computer from the wall. For most of the planet, we’re still in the midst of the massive leap that is smart phones. It put a computer in the pocket of billions of people.

    Beating that is hard. Smart phones are the most accessible, most powerful devices most end users have ever used. We take that for granted, and we take the time it took to get there for granted. It took 25 years of desktops to get real, decent laptops (personally, I’d say mid 90s). It took 25 of laptops to get real, decent smartphones (again personally, I’d say ~2010ish).

    Like it or not, we have another decade to go probably before the technology is there for the next evolution in personal computing. But the problem we have really is that there’s not another leap as far as accessibility is concerned. Smart phones work places where laptops can’t. Laptops work places where desktops can’t. Desktops work places where mainframes can’t. Smart phones can work anywhere. Taking the computer from the datacenter, to the home, to your backpack, to your pocket is huge. Is the next step from the pocket to your wrist? To your face? Is it worth it? Is it really that much better?

  • alehel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t want ads thrown into my eyeballs. So that’s a big no from me.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with you fully. It’s a sad state that we can’t even imagine wearable glasses tech without invasive ads

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guess what Tim Apple? No one wants them just like no one wanted your stupid headset that I honestly can’t even remember what it was called.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well I do want this, augmented/virtual reality is exactly the kind of shit I dreamt about as a kid during the 90’s, and having a huge screen available anywhere I go is pretty fucking cool.

      But yeah, I used a VR headset exactly once for like 5 minutes, and there’s no way in hell I’d buy one from meta or apple. If Valve releases good XR/AR glasses I might consider it.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It sounds cool in theory, but modern tech companies aren’t going to make what you wanted as a kid. Whatever they make will be heavily enshittified.

        • tauren@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hold on a second. For it to be enshittified, it has to be good at the beginning, and I highly doubt that’s possible.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I love VR and have multiple devices but the platforms are still really bad. There’s so much jank amplified by all of the greed by Apple and Meta. For example on Apple’s VR device you can’t have multiple users - they were so greedy that they thought they’d sell multiple devices per household.

        Can’t wait for Valves Deckard or whatever next VR project they’re working on. Steamdeck is everything a handheld should be and if they can finally nail that in VR it would be awesome.