UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States vetoed a United Nations resolution Friday backed by almost all other Security Council members and many other nations demanding an immediate cease-fire in Gaz…
We better hope, they have. And I don’t think, their strategy is based on “Let’s destroy and decide afterwards”. The Israel opposition is also involved in the decision.
2.3 million people will not starve to death
The 2.3 million is obviously exaggerated. That’s the total population, but I accept that argument. Cease-fire can reduce “starving to death”, but it’s clear, that temporary “peace” is not permanent peace.
IMO, Netanyahu has a time window for external support. The longer this takes, the less the support. And that’s why they are pushing this operation.
I hope, this ends with a Hamas out of power, followed by the Israel opposition getting rid of Netanyahu, who is very unpopular since the attack on Israel. With a new government in Gaza and a new one in Israel, maybe, this gives them the opportunity to solve this conflict.
Let me explain the Hydra effect to you, maybe you don’t get it… Them taking this approach is guaranteed to create the next extremist group within a few years. Israel has already created the next Hamas.
Them taking this approach is guaranteed to create the next extremist group within a few years
I’d disagree that is guaranteed.
Trying to get rid of Hamas => There is a chance to resolve this forever. Maybe, this will fail. Maybe, it won’t.
Not doing anything => There is an extremist group (Hamas) and they will attack again, because their main goal is to destroy Israel. That’s what they say.
Come on… You compared Hamas with a hydra, not me. All my previous comments are pretty much signalizing that the hydra comparison is bad, because there is a chance to beat Hamas and solve the problem.
Just because you make that comparison does not make it a fact that trying to get rid of Hamas results in a new extremist organization.
Either we talk about the conflict between Hamas and Israel or about Greek mythology… 😉
The Hydra effect basically means that for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge. Killing the whole family of a young man or women, where do you think that would lead them? That’s because the root cause (oppression of Palestinians) is never solved. In fact, Israel is now making it worse with genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Causing violence, mayhem, and oppression is what brought Hamas about, and it’s what Israel is doing again to bring more Hamas-like factions about.
I am now completely convinced you don’t understand what the Hydra effect is at all.
No, of course not!!!1111 It’s very difficult to understand the word!!!111 Totally impossible to apply the “you slice 1 head off and 2 new ones appear” on the Hamas conflict to get “for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge”… Only you are able to do this /s
The Hydra effect basically means that for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge.
Good job. And now, you need to understand this: I don’t believe, that your theory “WE WILL FOR SURE EXPERIENCE THE HYDRA EFFECT” necessarily applies here!!
Do you understand that??
You act like it’s a fact that it’s 100% impossible that Israel could get rid of Hamas and that a new Gaza government and a new Israel government can find a persistent solution. It’s not.
You can not negotiate a persistent peace with an organization that has the main goal to destroy Israel. Their main goal is not a separate state. Their main goal is to destroy Israel!! Please tell me how you’d negotiate with them…
Hamas is a pain in the *** for Israel, but also for the civilians in Gaza. If Hamas stays, there won’t be peace and we make sure that even more generations of people die there.
You don’t believe in this thing expects have studied?
You believe, there will be peace with a terror organization that wants to destroy Israel?
There is probably no expert who says that there is a 100% guarantee that there must be a new Hamas after the current Hamas, just because Israel destroys it. That’s in your head. It’s not a fact, not a quote from any expert.
We better hope, they have. And I don’t think, their strategy is based on “Let’s destroy and decide afterwards”. The Israel opposition is also involved in the decision.
The 2.3 million is obviously exaggerated. That’s the total population, but I accept that argument. Cease-fire can reduce “starving to death”, but it’s clear, that temporary “peace” is not permanent peace.
IMO, Netanyahu has a time window for external support. The longer this takes, the less the support. And that’s why they are pushing this operation.
I hope, this ends with a Hamas out of power, followed by the Israel opposition getting rid of Netanyahu, who is very unpopular since the attack on Israel. With a new government in Gaza and a new one in Israel, maybe, this gives them the opportunity to solve this conflict.
Let me explain the Hydra effect to you, maybe you don’t get it… Them taking this approach is guaranteed to create the next extremist group within a few years. Israel has already created the next Hamas.
I understand what you meant.
I’d disagree that is guaranteed.
I think if you understood the Hydra effect, you wouldn’t say that. Yes, it’s guaranteed.
Come on… You compared Hamas with a hydra, not me. All my previous comments are pretty much signalizing that the hydra comparison is bad, because there is a chance to beat Hamas and solve the problem.
Just because you make that comparison does not make it a fact that trying to get rid of Hamas results in a new extremist organization.
Either we talk about the conflict between Hamas and Israel or about Greek mythology… 😉
Either we talk about the conflict between Hamas and Israel or about Greek mythology… 😉
Do you understand I’m talking about fighting extremism and not a lady with snakes for hair? The Hydra effect is a problem in counter extremism.
I am now completely convinced you don’t undertand what the Hydra effect is at all. Maybe I wasn’t clear, sorry about that…I suggest this excellent video from the Lines on Maps guy.. He is more qualified to talk about this.
The Hydra effect basically means that for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge. Killing the whole family of a young man or women, where do you think that would lead them? That’s because the root cause (oppression of Palestinians) is never solved. In fact, Israel is now making it worse with genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Causing violence, mayhem, and oppression is what brought Hamas about, and it’s what Israel is doing again to bring more Hamas-like factions about.
Jesus Christ, that’s Medusa, not Hydra…
No, of course not!!!1111 It’s very difficult to understand the word!!!111 Totally impossible to apply the “you slice 1 head off and 2 new ones appear” on the Hamas conflict to get “for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge”… Only you are able to do this /s
Good job. And now, you need to understand this: I don’t believe, that your theory “WE WILL FOR SURE EXPERIENCE THE HYDRA EFFECT” necessarily applies here!!
Do you understand that??
You act like it’s a fact that it’s 100% impossible that Israel could get rid of Hamas and that a new Gaza government and a new Israel government can find a persistent solution. It’s not.
You can not negotiate a persistent peace with an organization that has the main goal to destroy Israel. Their main goal is not a separate state. Their main goal is to destroy Israel!! Please tell me how you’d negotiate with them…
Hamas is a pain in the *** for Israel, but also for the civilians in Gaza. If Hamas stays, there won’t be peace and we make sure that even more generations of people die there.
Yeah, you’re right, that is Medusa. I wish your political knowledge was as good as your myth knowledge.
You don’t believe in this thing expects have studied? Lol good luck to you in life in general.
You believe, there will be peace with a terror organization that wants to destroy Israel?
There is probably no expert who says that there is a 100% guarantee that there must be a new Hamas after the current Hamas, just because Israel destroys it. That’s in your head. It’s not a fact, not a quote from any expert.