• Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would definitely prefer a world in which sources of content are often paid-only instead of ad-supported, but the main thing needed for such a world is a higher minimum wage so more people have disposable income to distribute to authors they appreciate.

    This would mean that if someone posts a rage-bait article like “Is Former President OBAMA Stealing Opium Money OUT OF YOUR POCKET?” then maybe people will click it, but the author won’t gain anything out of it.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way this would work is if you paid for a subscription to many news sources a la Netflix. No one will buy subscriptions to each individual author or publication. But of course Netflix now has ads too, so greed really has no bounds, especially once they’ve got you roped in.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A bigger concern with that model is that then Netflix of news or whatever gets to choose what you see. We’d have the Netflix of news with their own baked-in bullshit leading the charge regardless of how shit it was. Esoteric sources would die and popularity would rule that space.