• bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I understand that the US is likely vulnerable to cyber attack, but is a widespread attack by China likely in the immediate future?

    I mean, let’s say China does disable infrastructure, banking, etc in a coordinated and widespread attack. But then what? An attack on that scale is an act of war, and I doubt China would be willing to follow up with military action at this time.

    Perhaps this is more of a preventive MAD type strategy? Essentially a warning to the US to not mess with China, or else these are the consequences.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Let us face squarely the paradox that the world which goes to war is a world, usually genuinely desiring peace. War is the outcome, not mainly of evil intentions, but on the whole of good intentions which miscarry or are frustrated. It is made not usually by evil men knowing themselves to be wrong, but is the outcome of policies pursued by good men usually passionately convinced that they are right.

        —Norman Angell, author of The Great Illusion

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think a lot of American planners expect the next war to be against China more than Russia, most likely as part of efforts to reclaim Taiwan militarily. Whether that actually happens or not, China seems to be trying to build a military that can win against the U.S., either by matching strengths or some more asymmetric means. I think I saw a story recently that China was constructing mockups of American navy ships in a desert that seem to be for war gaming, as an example.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Had a long talk with a very intelligent, young, Navy SIGINT guy last New Years. He’s been out there, intercepting and working on signal intelligence. Basically said, “China is the enemy, and they’re far more able and serious than you think. Can’t say much more, take it or leave it.”

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            If 75% of China’s population is poor and rural, that other 25% is still higher than USA’s population, which also includes poor and rural people.

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s debatable, but that doesn’t have much bearing on China’s military capabilities. Their urban canters are very much developed. You could also say that much of the US is rural and poor, while our military has been involving themselves all over the world for a long time.

            • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well a powerful economic base is the foundation of a superpower. The US leans on General Dynamics, Raytheon, countless contractors, etc. China has no base as extensive as that.

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Idk if Taiwan would be worth the war, at least not more than supplying Ukraine who’s fighting Russia, which has done way more damage to our country recently. We need to catch up on our local chip manufacturing capabilities fast first, though.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right after they had that Asia pacific summit in SF, suddenly there was very little news about threats to Taiwan, and there was a lot of news about new chip manufacturing setting up in like Arizona and Utah or something. Which makes me think we are going to let China take Taiwan.

        • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I can’t blame China for wanting Taiwan back. Imagine if we had a civil war and a foreign military invaded and occupied Alaska during a war just before it. Then at the end of the war one side fled to Alaska and declared it independant but we couldn’t retake it because we were so debilitated from the civil war and the war before it. Now a foreign government steps in and says you can’t retake your territory because they said so. I’d be pissed too.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Well, while I understand them wanting it back with that context, it’s also been long enough that it feels like there’s no point or at least not worth the trouble for them, either lol. I’m just anti-war on all fronts. It’s just, idk, why at this point? National pride? It’s not like the have a ton of resources, like oil like Alaska does, do they? Just the tech sector, and China could probably catch up on chip manufacturing part of that in time or just get them through trade.

            But maybe people’s grandparents can still probably remember when they were united and we need more time. Plus, I know they can get pretty nationalistic over there, too. I’m sure the US would try to take Hawaii in 50 years of whatever if a foreign country helped them separate from us, even though I’d like to think if they didn’t want to rejoin, we wouldn’t. But who knows, I’ve seen our right-wing in power 🙄

            • drz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you look at a map of China and the Pacific you can see that the “first island chain” of US allies totally surrounds China. From their military and strategic point of view they are being contained.

              Now if China were to control the island of Taiwan they would break that containment. It’s very likely they care more about the strategic position rather than whatever it is they say about wanting to reunite with the Taiwanese. They don’t give a shit about the Taiwanese, they just want the island.

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Ah, I didn’t even think about it in geographic sense. Makes total sense. And ya, the people in power never care about that petty shit like national unity, it’s just what they use to get the country on board with the next war or whatever, so with hindsight not sure why I went down that tangent lol.

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, it’s not likely at all unless we get into an open conflict. Then cyber warfare will be just one arena of conflict. But I think most estimates are that that would be disastrous for us, china and the world so it’s unlikely for now.

      It’s way more likely that the fbi want more money or are repeating some talking point to push an agenda or as a political favor.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      That being said, if America ever plunges into a civil war it would be the best time for them to cripple the US infrastructure and do anything they want to Taiwan and SEA while having the US consumed in an infighting.

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what it seems like to me. I don’t see China executing a cyber attack without being willing and able to follow up with military action. Preparation, as you said.

        Tensions don’t seem high enough currently for that to be the case, but perhaps someday they will be. At that point we’d be facing an all out war.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Tensions can flair up any moment over anything, so while it might seem unlikely today all it takes is one Serbian guy with a gun to start a world war.

          Whereas training hackers can take years, so start early.

          I cant see China starting shit while Russia is failing so poorly and Irans limited in its capabilities. I assume the idea is to create regional instability for the next decade or two and try to push the US to its limits. Although Japan entered the war when it knew it wasnt ready, hoping on a hail mary strike to nullify Us capabilities, so don’t discount prideful stupidity speeding that up.

          • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I guess my comment was a bit vague. China is certainly currently interfering with our systems on a smaller scale. I was referring to a large scale, widespread cyber attack as described in the article.

            It’s highly likely China is capable of of that sort of attack. But I don’t see how we’re more at risk of that happening now than any other military action.

            Another commenter described it well as another theater of a potential war, not necessarily that a war is imminent at this point

    • 𝔹𝕝𝕒𝕔𝕜 𝕊𝕜𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕕 𝕁𝕖𝕨@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why would they want to push a massive cyber warfare if they can hack and collect as much information as they want to push communism all over the world(that’s the purpose of intelligence work), I mean it’s not what about Huawei and TikTok are hated in the US?

      All it’s just about pushing a certain agenda.

      You don’t need to be a genius to realize WWIII it’s not about China vs US, it’s about Communism(socialism) vs fascism(elite) as always have been.

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Do you know anything about cyber security or are just passionate because you get to talk about war. If China were to coordinate an widespread attack, do you think it is as simple as the attack will come straight from the computer in the CCP headquarters and you go in to save the day?

      Do you have any idea of how many outdated, unsecured, vulnerable devices (most of them made in China) could be used around the world just to have a plausible deniability. Ever heard of phishing? It could have come from your friend’s email and you could be the one that’s spreading the worm. And it would take months to trace it back to China. These are not script kiddies you see on the movies.

      Start Air gaping critical infrastructure from the internet instead of dreaming about hypothetical wars.

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Did you reply to the wrong comment? I don’t think my comment is really related the points you’ve brought up.

        • HATEFISH@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think the point they were trying to make was that China would have plausible deniablity based on where the attacks could be initially traced to.¯\_(ツ)_/¯