• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    79
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why do you want free universities for degrees that actually give a net benefit?

    And the reason housing is so expensive is directly due to government intervention in housing.

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 months ago

      because I’m not a piece of shit and want to see my fellow Americans do better. a rising tide lifts all boats.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Wow TIL all degrees are useless.

          What’d you get your degree in? Maybe you got a useless one.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            Where did I say all degrees are useless? I got my degrees in engineering and science.

            • GhostFence@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              Dude you must think they get their degrees in feminist dance or some boogeyman degree. News flash you want some people to get good jobs with that “useless” feminist dance degree. Because if not, they’re going to crowd into degrees like engineering and greater numbers of engineering grads creates greater competition for engineering jobs… which drives down the pay that most engineers get, plus it reduces the odds of actually getting a starter engineering job. Supply & demand.

              Signed, 100% NOT a feminist.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                The market pretty much tells us what are useful and useless degrees. The issue with your theory is that people do crowd into engineering and then the joke is after they fail they do business.

                • GhostFence@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So when they shipped computer engineering jobs overseas the market was saying computer engineering is useless? Man you really know a lot of things that simply aren’t true.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Its probably much more complicated than you are implying it is. Are people with computer engineering unable to get jobs? If the answer is no, then the supply of computer engineers is probably not enough in america or it could be something completely different and could be related to manufacturing.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why do you want free universities for degrees that actually give a net benefit?

      It is in your sentence. I want things that offer a net benefit. That’s why I like fire departments for example. We all benefit from not having uncontrolled fire about.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s 100 percent, certified bullshit.

      Government could fix housing SUPER fast. Tax rental payments on single-family homes at 100% to make SFR build-to-rent impossible.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I work in municipal development.

          100% of new single-family developments approaching the city over the last 2 years have been for build-to-rent exclusively. The existing SFR homes are being bought up at massively inflated prices to convert them into rentals.

          The only reliable way to buy a home for your family to live in within 50 miles of the city is to buy empty land and have a custom million+ dollar house built, because the existing inventory is being grabbed up by rental investors and new inventory isn’t even being made available for sale.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            If that is true then your area is very different than the rest of everywhere, because SFH are terrible investments. And taxing them is just going to make housing more expensive and fix nothing.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure, in short housing is too difficult and too expensive to build to keep up with demand. All this is due to government requirements on housing which adds over $100k on average per single family house, as well as it just being a general headeache. And this doesnt even get into the currency manipulation issue.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          What requirements though?

          And the government doesn’t control monetary policy, so can you expand on that too?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            There are probably 1000 different requirements for each small town and then add the state and national ones to that. The requirements will be things like getting an engineering report if you remove more than 10 yards of dirt, or add a roof element that makes the house look good.

            The government does control the supply of money via the Federal Reserve. If you are interested I can tell you how it directly makes the rich richer and takes the wealth of the middle class and poor.

            • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              The fed is independent. If you’d like, I can give you a primer on how that works

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Let me get this straight, the US controls and funds all kinds of governments around the world but they wouldnt control the fed? “But its a private company!!!” Sure it is, its totally not completely controlled by the government…

                • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It’s not and they have proven as much every single election cycle by not giving into political pressure.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Thats funny because both sides are EXACTLY THE SAME with regards to the fed, and its robbing from the poor and middle class. Literally only a couple people in the two main parties even say anything about how bad the fed is. If you dont know anything about a subject, it would be best to learn about it, but at least dont argue like you know about it.