“I will be asking the attorney general’s office for their input,” Secretary of State David Scanlan told the Globe. “And ultimately whatever is decided is probably going to require some judicial input.”

A debate among constitutional scholars over former president Donald Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 presidential race has reverberated through the public consciousness in recent weeks and reached the ears of New Hampshire’s top election official.

Secretary of State David Scanlan, who will oversee the first-in-the-nation presidential primary in just five months, said he’s received several letters lately that urge him to take action based on a legal theory that claims the Constitution empowers him to block Trump from the ballot.

Scanlan, a Republican, said he’s listening and will seek legal advice to ensure that his team thoroughly understands the arguments at play.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah… This would be one of the worst things possible.

    The idea you could take someone to court to disqualify them means you’re allowing the courts into politics.

    But hey I already see people here celebrating this because “Fuck Trump” Right? Yet don’t see they’re creating a new loaded gun that can be turned against them in the next election…

    And before someone says “Four cases”… any bar would be able to be met by a politically motivated group, but again you do you, just realize shit like this has long lasting repercussions.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      The courts have already been involved in politics. Like, all the fuckin time.

      The US Supreme Court literally decided the 2000 election that largely led us to where we are now.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      This wouldn’t allow courts in politics; it would allow the constitution in politics.

    • steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      means you’re allowing the courts into politics

      Allow me to introduce you to my friend Chad. Hanging Chad.

    • burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meh. I don’t really care. With the bias in the senate and all the Gerrymandering on the state level, we might as well have the crazies disqualify candidates as random. Look at Georgia and kemp, they are already doing it. Let’s let them do it more so people wake up and realize this is not acceptable.