Prosecutors made the unusual decision this week to remain almost entirely mum about the order in which they planned to call their first witnesses in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York.

Joshua Steinglass, a prosecutor working on behalf of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Friday evening he would let Trump’s attorneys know the name of their first witness on Sunday night, the day before opening arguments in the case are set to begin, according to a report from the courtroom. Trump’s defense team had asked for the names of the first three witnesses that prosecutors would call.

“Mr. Trump has been tweeting about the witnesses," Steinglass told Judge Juan Merchan. "We’re not telling them who the witnesses are.”

Blanche then asked Merchan if he could have the information if he promised Trump would not post on social media about the witnesses, to which Merchan replied that he did not believe Blanche could make such a vow.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        The thing is, he wouldn’t do it openly. He’d pass the names to an assistant who would make some anonymous posts online and let it go from there. Sure, maybe that can be proven in another trial, but that’s too far away to help the witnesses or to avoid slowing this case

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          He is too stupid to keep his mouth shut. The problem is the courts are too cowardly to enforce their own gag orders.

          “Please stop tweeting about the clerks and family members of the court.” [He immediately tweets about the clerks and family members.] “Oh, ok, please have a 10 day extension and we’ll give you a far lesser bond.”

          • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Once you put it like that, it’s just laughable how much they’ve pampered this asshole. And he still. Fucking. Complains.

            • azimir@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              The entire right wing and Christian movements in the US seems to be based on nothing on persecution syndrome. It’s just moaning about how oppressed they are day in an day out.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          he wouldn’t do it openly

          …where have you been for the past 7 years plus change?

          He does MOST of his crimes openly and the rest he publicly brags about later!

          There’s literally NO way he’d ever try to make his witness tampering discreet. That would be like expecting Guy Fieri to cook without ketchup 😛

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        The thing is where will you house the orange asshole’s Secret Service detail in a prison?

        That’s gotta be a huge drawback for any judge to send him to prison during a trial.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            If a U.S. President Goes to Prison, Does the Secret Service Go, Too?

            Under current United States federal law, all former presidents are entitled to lifetime protection from the Secret Service. Barring an act of Congress or a presidential executive order, the Secret Service is bound by law to protect former presidents for life. There aren’t any exceptions listed in the statute governing the protection of former presidents.

            Trump’s various indictments have left many wondering if the Secret Service would accompany Trump (or any other convicted former president) to prison.

            “Yes, no question,” said Ronald Kessler, author of two books about the Secret Service: “In the President’s Secret Service” and “The First Family Detail.” “There wouldn’t be a Secret Service agent inside his cell, but I expect that there would be two agents outside of his cell, two agents in the corridor leading up to the cell block and another two agents at the entrance to the prison.”

            Other commentators, including a former Secret Service agent, have said that as few as two Secret Service agents could be posted at the prison, but Kessler called that “crazy.”

            *** There are multiple links in the article that I haven’t transferred here.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              “Don’t deserve” is a completely different thing that “Won’t get” which seems important to point out because your response is about the latter.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I copied portions of an article. I wasn’t personally choosing deserve or get.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Then why did you choose those specific quotes as a response to my statement about not deserving?

                  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Because the federal rules were in it. Deserving or undeserving has little to do with it then.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why would he need a secret service detail? He has prison guards.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think many consider witness intimidation to be a big thing. Threatening judges/advocates/… is big, doxing their families as a form of intimidation goes beyond even that. They should have never let them (not just Trump, but also others who were making threats or encouraging others to make threats) get away with it.

      That it gets a pass as “not bad enough” is indicative of how far the USA civil society has fallen.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      He needs to not be treated like a fucking king because he isn’t one. Presidents are just people who happen to be elected, and shouldn’t get treated like royalty.

      Worrying about making him a martyr is counterproductive.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Presidents are just people who happen to be elected

        Some of them not even that, such as himself and first term Dubya.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He is already claiming to be a martyr since being charged for all the civil and criminal indictments