Wow, didn’t even give enough time for the GOP to look up his arrest record, drug history, NOTHING. Is it even due process if the right doesn’t explain why he should die first?
Are you a bot designed to start inflammatory discussion? Because I see no police apologists… yet.
Not that it won’t happen, it will, but… why preemptively cause friction? Makes me suspicious of your account when you are posting “right bad” before they even showed up. Weird.
That said, your point is valid, but to me it’s also shouting, “I’m a bot here to catalyze disagreements and derail into partisan bickering!”
I suppose there is also a chance a comment was removed? Idk. But I do know 100% that rich folks invest in “division” bots, it makes perfect sense from a chaotic evil PoV.
I’m not a bot. I insight inflammatory discussions because calling out the right for their lack of humanity is low hanging fruit. I do it because silence is acceptance and I do not accept their bullshit.
In 2020, the FOP endorsed Trump over Democrat Joe Biden, even though Biden had often won the support of police unions when he was a U.S. senator and vice president. “The FOP is proud to endorse a candidate who calls for law and order across our nation,” FOP president Patrick Yoes wrote of Trump then.
It was a familiar sight: “The former president often takes pictures with the police who accompany his motorcade on the campaign trail, and his aides regularly share videos of the interactions on social media to highlight the officers’ support.”
Well, the one thing I can say is that democrats aren’t abolishing civilian oversight. Wasn’t that just passed in Florida, Texas, or some other red stronghold? I feel like I saw a conservative governor who banned civilian oversight.
That’s certainly one difference. If you want oversight, it’s hard to get conservative politicians on board.
Voting Democrat is not choosing your gender, it only has to represent you if you want that, like Trump voters, totally unnecessary.
Voting Democrat is a strategic choice one could make so that their job of helping those in need is easier and less risky (you are working to help others right? or just throwing a wrench to make things harder for others?). Republican cruelty will put those who support Palestine or feed homeless at risk for jail and things like that. Making your own job harder to make a statement nobody will see because it will be drowned out by the presidential results doesn’t seem like a very smart thing to do.
Wow, didn’t even give enough time for the GOP to look up his arrest record, drug history, NOTHING. Is it even due process if the right doesn’t explain why he should die first?
Are you a bot designed to start inflammatory discussion? Because I see no police apologists… yet.
Not that it won’t happen, it will, but… why preemptively cause friction? Makes me suspicious of your account when you are posting “right bad” before they even showed up. Weird.
That said, your point is valid, but to me it’s also shouting, “I’m a bot here to catalyze disagreements and derail into partisan bickering!”
I suppose there is also a chance a comment was removed? Idk. But I do know 100% that rich folks invest in “division” bots, it makes perfect sense from a chaotic evil PoV.
I’m not a bot. I insight inflammatory discussions because calling out the right for their lack of humanity is low hanging fruit. I do it because silence is acceptance and I do not accept their bullshit.
Fair enough, I agree with you.
Removed by mod
And yet…
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-jan-6-police-unions_n_65d67a16e4b0b65d69218857
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/28/us/politics/trump-nypd-officer-wake.html
And then there was the time Trump was president and stood in front of a bunch of cops and told them to rough up suspects… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eVPKpBKGCE
explains why
NOT LIKE THAT!
Are you a bot designed to start imflammatory discussion?
Because their post has some upvotes and nobody has started any inflammatory discussion on their post other than you accusing them of being a bot.
It’s bots all the way down 😭
Except that’s not at all what the commentor did. Seems you’re stirring up bs for no real reason other than to stir up bs.
I did it out of curiosity, but I can see validity in your perspective as well.
Are you incapable of detecting sarcasm?
Often, yes.
the topic itself is inflammatory because its death meted out arbitrarily by police without process or threat.
What division? That is literally what the GOP does when the police kill someone.
How about we have ourselves a pig fry? Fry a couple of pigs, in front of their brothers and sisters—it would be so great! I’m hungry, are you?
I certainly share that sentiment each time I see a new victim of police brutality.
It’s enraging.
Removed by mod
Well, the one thing I can say is that democrats aren’t abolishing civilian oversight. Wasn’t that just passed in Florida, Texas, or some other red stronghold? I feel like I saw a conservative governor who banned civilian oversight.
That’s certainly one difference. If you want oversight, it’s hard to get conservative politicians on board.
Voting Democrat is not choosing your gender, it only has to represent you if you want that, like Trump voters, totally unnecessary.
Voting Democrat is a strategic choice one could make so that their job of helping those in need is easier and less risky (you are working to help others right? or just throwing a wrench to make things harder for others?). Republican cruelty will put those who support Palestine or feed homeless at risk for jail and things like that. Making your own job harder to make a statement nobody will see because it will be drowned out by the presidential results doesn’t seem like a very smart thing to do.
Removed by mod
You understand the world is not black and white right? Like you are familiar with the word “worse”?
I’m going to stop you right there and say no, they don’t.
Removed by mod
Do you think giving up your voice is actually holding them accountable?