• MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      more like chinese cars were manufactured with child labor with well below average work conditions

        • stembolts@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yea, it’s the subsidies. The government of China funds questionably profitable companies such that they can sell their products at what would be a loss by any other company, undermining the values of competition in Europe/States.

          What does China get out of it? Chinese products distributed globally running Chinese software and sensors which are beholden to the whims of the Chinese Government. They also get to weaken the economies of the target countries.

          The United States does similar things with intelligence, but citizens of that country can at least condemn, research, and publish findings against it’s own government. What can a Chinese citizen do? Very little except obey.

          The United States is also massively flawed when it comes to competition but at least there are theoretical methods for the citizens of that country to change things. If they can destroy the corporate plutocracy currently strangling democracy.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            6 months ago

            Communist country figures out how to exploit capitalism better than capitalist country, how poetic.

            • 3volver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              China isn’t a communist country, it’s a totalitarian country.

              Characterized by a government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control. Totalitarianism is a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

              Communism is defined as:

              political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                6 months ago

                It calls itself communist just like a big chunk of the world calls itself capitalist but doesn’t let the market regulate itself

                • 3volver@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  North Korea calls itself the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Do you also refer to North Korea as a Democratic country?

            • stembolts@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Being an open country has upsides and downsides certainly. The same could be said for Russia/China’s information war exploiting freedom of speech on those not educated in critical thought.

          • callouscomic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            As if the US doesn’t also subsidize and funnel money into specific companies/industries for questionable reasons.

            • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Did you read their whole comment? They addressed that and pointed it out several times themselves.

              • callouscomic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                All they said is that you are allowed to call it out. Whoopdeedoo. Still happens.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Every car manufacturer receives massive subsidies no matter where they are located.

          This is oil money, nothing more, nothing less.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You might want to look at some of the loosening child labor laws here in the US. Hyundai’s plants have been caught several times using child labor.

        I’m not defending China’s practices by any means because many are truly horrific but the US is pretty far from perfect in many states.

        • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have actually heard about that and it is very unfortunate. But it is still no match for having Uyghur Muslims in concentration camps and using them as forceful labor (just like how the nazis did with the Jews). Both are horrible, but one is clearly much darker and more disgusing than the other allowing them to make them even cheaper, on top of thr already mentioned chinese government subsidies.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        What child labor? There are no kids in China, they have some of the lowest fertility in the world and the most intense school hours for the rest

        You’re like 40 years out of date

    • juicy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, and it’s poor Americans who need a vehicle to buy groceries and get to work everyday who are getting shafted while the automakers rake in the profits. Not to mention the environmental costs of driving on fossil fuels.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Allowing China to sell these vehicles here at well below cost is only going to shaft poor Americans even further. They’re trying to do what Walmart does to small-town economies.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You give a great example because the US has no problem with shafting poor Americans if it’s American companies (i.e. big donors to American politicians) doing the shafting. At least we’d get affordable vehicles from these Chinese companies. Meanwhile the complacent American auto companies have engorged themselves on profits from overpriced vehicles, announcing record-breaking profits, and refusing to reduce prices even when supply chain issues have been worked out. This is after American auto companies sat around with their thumbs up their asses, dragging their heels on developing electric vehicles, and even working against the development of them. Now they’re claiming that demand for EVs isn’t actually all that great, but for some reason they’re afraid of Chinese EVs (probably because the Chinese are giving customers what they actually want – affordable practical EVs).

          These leeches needed to be bailed out and they will forever need to be bailed out because instead of running a business that gives people what they want, they just do whatever can extract the most money out of people while squandering the profits on stock buybacks and fat bonuses for their executives. They’re considered too big to fail, but really they’re too big to exist.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can make up dastardly schemes to explain the prices all you want but this isn’t borne out in reality. The bigger EV manufacturers here, outside of Tesla, aren’t even American companies, they’re South Korean and European and they’re all selling their vehicles for similar prices to American companies. Tesla seems to be doing pretty well with sales, which means plenty of people are willing to pay these prices.

            Additionally, apart from Tesla, there are only two American auto companies, GM and Ford, so I don’t know why you think they’re controlling the entire auto industry in the US.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              If I’m just making things up, then why are car prices so damn high and car companies are posting record profits? Tesla is only doing fine because it was the first big EV manufacturer to market and it’s riding on that momentum. People willing to go with the least worst option available doesn’t mean the option isn’t bad. If it was a good option, then the ones offering those options wouldn’t be afraid of the competition. Tesla cancelled development of a $25k model shortly before these tariffs would be announced. This is not a mere coincidence. They know that there is high demand for cheap EVs, but auto companies here much prefer fatter profit margins and the government is all too happy to protect those fatter profit margins.

              Chinese companies focused on development of better and cheaper batteries and the result is that they’re able to offer much cheaper EVs. Why should that be punished while the other car companies get rewarded for dragging their heels on EVs due to their comfort in selling petrol cars?

        • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Chinese EV companies are rather profitable, with BYD making billions of yuan profit last year. On the other hand, Rivian is losing, what was it, just about $40,000 per car?

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            And that profit is coming straight from the government as there is no way they’re making billions in profit by selling brand new cars for $10k in 2024. There is zero margin there.

            • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              They have cars from $10k to $200+k. BYD includes a bunch of brands, including the Yangwang brand which builds the $150k U8 and the $230k U9. Not to mention their busses which are used around the world.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Cool but I don’t see how that’s relevant to the discussion of them trying to sell $10k EVs in the US.

                Nobody here is arguing to buy a $230,000 Chinese EV.

                • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  They wouldn’t only sell $10k vehicles, and they wouldn’t only target the bottom of the market. If their actions in other countries are to be repeated, they wouldn’t sell $10k vehicles in the US, because the market isn’t nearly as competitive. It’s very likely, given the prices they’re charging elsewhere, that the lowest prices we’d see for a BYD would be $20k.

                  BYD currently makes ~$1,500 per vehicle, compared to Ford at $3,000, and Tesla at $5,300/vehicle. They’re lower margin, certainly, but they’re not just dumping cars at bargain bin prices.

                  US manufacturers received 4x the subsidy that Chinese manufacturers did last year. If anyone is trying to artificially manipulate the market, it’s the place that’s blockading their competitors vehicles while pumping dozens of billions of dollars into them every year.

                  You would be the person complaining about Japanese cars in the 80s, to be honest, and if we listened to them, we’d all still be getting 12mpg driving V6 and V8 2 ton monstrosities that break down every 5000 miles. Many of us still do, the F-150 is the most popular car in the US after all, but the rest of us at least have the option to get high mileage, high reliability vehicles.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m not working in the conditions the Chinese have decided is ok. They can be poor and live in barracks at factories, I like free time and money.

      • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        So youre saying American cars dont import any parts? They dont preassemble overseas? Everything is 100% made by american Union labor?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Big 3 copium as usual.

    Eventually they’ll do what Japense OEMs did and open factories in the USA.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    How about American companies just learn to compete? The same bullshit is why we can’t get a fucking normal sized truck in this country.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      How about American workers learn to work for the same wages and working conditions.

      If you want companies to pay a living wage with strong unions and safe working conditions, then competition with other places that don’t bother with those things becomes near impossible.

      See: The factories that iPhone is built in

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No. We can still pay workers much better and make much more lower priced affordable models.

        Stop giving the CEOs, upper management, investors, etc., millions and millions of dollars. I don’t care what anyone says.

        We can have the sub 10k priced EV, or even less, like China has. They can still make money on luxury/performance “status” models.

        This is all about keeping extreme wealth for the extreme wealthy. Wall Street, etc. Full stop.

        We can have very well payed workers and much cheaper yet still quality vehicles.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are these tariffs based off how they treat their workers? Do countries with good working conditions not have tariffs?

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        EV manufacture is mostly automated… This argument makes no sense. 8 people to build an ICE. you only need one for an EV.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They aren’t sweeping Chinese cars under the road here as much as they are sweeping an actually affordable, practical EV option that could easily win the mass market and shift the status quo away from ICE engine vehicles at scale.

    Bigger problem is, that while blocking the Chinese options, they won’t give us a similar option at that same affordable cost.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Read as: The only way they can compete with Chinese vehicles is 100% tariff

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    i wouldnt hate this so much if america produced quality automobiles. but we dont. so watch people pay double for something that will last twice as long.

    even at equal pricing, they just push out better quality than we can seem to muster

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Considering how many Boeing aircraft are out there operating every day and how very little we hear about issues I am not sure this is an effective example.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            New Boeing planes are being built everyday. Americans companies are filling these orders every month.

            You hear a couple of bad things in the news and you get hysterical.

            Perspective is important.

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Overpriced for sure, but there are great options out there. Been driving fords for years. Have a ranger now and an old 7.3 that is invincible.

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      We absolutely do make quality vehicles in the USA. Especially pickup trucks.

      • Brokenbutstrong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Modern American cars suck

        Chevy has notoriously weak body panels. The 3.6 they’re throwing in everything has issues with the cylinder deactivation system. The 4 bangers are made in Korea from Daewoo. They also have weird electrical issues, usually due to the 2 battery system. Certain ones shipped with features built in but not wired up and functional (heated seats). They have to retrofit newer models with features from older ones (heated wheel in the tahoes must be retrofitted from 21 or older models), no blind zone either on the tahoes which is strange for a new vehicle in it’s class.

        Ford had engine fire recalls on most of their trucks and large SUVs. Transmission issues plagued Fords as well if you bought automatic like 90% of Americans. 1.0 EcoSport had a dogshit motor. The only two Ford products worth buying are a Mustang or a Ford Edge if you’re a mainstream consumer. I consider the raptor and enthusiast truck

        Dodge/Chrysler has been consistent, but consistently mid. Transmission issues in all the trucks. Most of the SUVs like the compass and Cherokee run a fiat 4 cylinder. The 5.7 hemi gets only marginally better performance than the 3.6 pentastar. The 6.4 and 5.7 have lifter issues. The 3.6 had some minor misfire issues in the Pacificas. Some of the new jeep wranglers are a 2.0 turbo. It helps when you design the same vehicle since 2013.

        Post COVID cars worth buying

        Anything Toyota/Lexus if you want the best all around

        Anything Mazda that’s naturally aspirated, or turbo if you care about your car maintenance.

        Anything Hyundai/Kia that has a Korean motor (1.6t) and you maintain your car. The American made motors for Hyundai are terrible.

        Altima and 4 cylinder rogue is fine. 6 cylinder maxima and Murano is fine. CVT isn’t as bad as it used to be. I don’t trust the 3 cylinder turbo.

        Subaru is mid, the fa24 is good. The FB25 is mid and have issues after 100k if maintenance isn’t done and PCV isn’t maintained. The CVT is okay. The wrx 6 speed is mid. The STI is discountinued but had the best transmission. If you like expensive projects, go with any performance Subaru, and spend 3-4k on an STi drivetrain, it’ll bolt up 9 times out of 10

        Honda 1.5t has head gasket issues. The 2.0 is great, but they’re not really using it much. The civic SI is mid and gets outperformaned by a Jetta.

        Volkswagens are great if you maintain your car well. I have a controversial argument that the ea888 2.0t is the best all around 4 cylinder, even the k series.

        Luxury brands like Audi, bmw, Mercedes and the such aren’t great for a mainstream consumer. Enthusiasts that do research will buy them anyway. For the average person, they’re too expensive to maintain, and the luxury features people seek can be attained in a Signature trim Mazda for a fraction of the price.

        I’m autistic, I work around cars every day, and I really really like cars.

        • deezbutts@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have a 2019 turbo cx5… Besides oil changes and tire rotation, what additional maintenance should I be doing over a naturally aspirated engine?

          • Brokenbutstrong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Outside of regular oil changes, I’d say spark plugs at 75-90k. I would flush coolant at 100k, then every 60k. Check your belts and hoses at 95-110k. Check your brake and fuel lines at 100k. Air filter every other oil change. If you ever take your intercooler off, check for oil blow by. A little bit won’t kill it. If at or under a quarter tank, don’t go full throttle to reduce strain on the fuel pump.

            Transmission fluid flush at 90-100k with the filter. At 75k is when I would make it a habit to check oil every time at the gas pump if you think of it. Modern cars can burn oil per spec at higher mileages.

            The turbo should be fine if you keep your oil and coolant maintained. If you just use it as a daily driver, you shouldn’t need to touch anything else until it breaks. An upgraded fuel pump can be insurance, but not necessary.

            At higher mileages (120k+), you might start seeing signs of worn suspension and worn bushings. But if they aren’t wobbling and aren’t broken and you don’t mind the ride, it’ll be fine. But replacing bushings would make the ride good as new

            I’m sure I’m missing something. But the Subaru forums have a really good write-up on midlife maintenance. A lot of this can apply to your Mazda

            • Coreidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Careful with transmission flushes. They usually cause more trouble than it’s worth. This is usually a bad idea unless you’re already having issues.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s enough Korean videos out there slamming their engines for me to believe the Korean-made engines are any better. It’s a design flaw.

        • Cornpop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Man Chrysler products suck so bad! The only American brand next to Tesla would never buy. I’m a car dealer in FL and have seen it all, all vehicles have their problems, it mainly comes down to how they are treated and maintained. I’ve currently got a 2019 ford ranger with a good tune on it and have not had a single issue 65k miles down the road.

          • Brokenbutstrong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The 2.3 block you have was based off the Mazda L engine that they had in the older rangers/b2000, but newer heads

            The Ecoboost wouldn’t be good without Mazda and Cosworth

            • Cornpop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ford owned a controlling share of Mazda during the L series design, it was developed together by ford and Mazda. It’s not just the heads, everything is different except the cylinder blocks lineage. No interchangeable parts.

              • Brokenbutstrong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Also I was talking post COVID cars, since that’s what time we’re in. 2020+ American cars are not as good as they used to be.

                Sure Ford co developed the engine, and it wasn’t put in American Ford models outside of the focus until 5 years after it’s development. But a lot of the research and design was mazda

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        What a claim to fame. The best absurdly large pedestrian killers for suburban parents to pick up groceries with.

        • Cornpop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Stupid if you don’t need one. Absolutely essential if you do. I am a car dealer and also do aircraft salvage, without a good truck the business is not possible.

          • vividspecter@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            True, but most of the people driving them absolutely do not need one, and that’s an intentional strategy pushed by car makers to work around emissions standards and because larger vehicles have a higher profit margin.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Great news after Tesla cancelled it’s plans for an entry model. Green for me not for thee.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are some other American brands that have decent EV options now. Hopefully that continues to grow

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        GM who put out a faulty platform across several brands and gave data to insurers so premiums shot up? Or Ford who can’t build an EV below 50k and are allergic to building something that’s not the size of an armored military vehicle?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            This article is more about their battery problems than their software problems. It does however at least mention the stop sale order due to software glitches. Combine that with the battery problem and well… I’m hoping for a good 2024 but I’m not holding my breath.

            And taxing Chinese EVs before they even come to market, but after they’ve proven themselves in Europe is just so obviously a protectionist move.

          • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was a victim of what I believe he’s talking about; the chip went haywire and took months to fix on my volt. It was a wide spread problem and they had a few of them in the dealership waiting on the part

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Free market for thee, but not for mee.

    I don’t actually mind the US protecting their economy from a predatory one that is more powerful - but I’d like USians to remember this when their politicians argue for war against 3rd world countries that want to protect their economies from the US.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    Blatantly anti-competitive practices. We don’t have a free market in the US. Shit is expensive so the wealthy can continue to profit at record levels while citizens pay the price. Why try to compete when you can protect the wealthy and make your country suffer?

    • profdc9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      The CCP can artificially depress the value of their currency and subsidize their industries indefinitely. They are doing this on the backs of their workers, who should earn more for their labor. They are doing this because their own workers are too poor to provide sufficient domestic demand for their consumer goods, however, this strategy just makes their workers poorer, exacerbating the problem. Chinese exports should be used to make their economy self-sustaining, but they just perpetuate economic bubbles and malinvestment that cause economic stagnation. Neither domestic nor international commerce has never been free of interference or fair.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        and subsidize their industries indefinitely

        People keep saying this that are fully aware the US subsidizes its industries too. Yeah? They subsidize their electric vehicles? Fuckin good!

        • profdc9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think whataboutism ever helps anything. American subsidies and bailouts has not resulted in better consumer choice. However, choosing options that are due to dumping isn’t going to produce sustainable industry either in China after the subsidies there end. The only real solution is to actually make practical electric vehicles at an affordable price.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Its resulted in lower prices for the industries subsidized.

            I have no idea what you mean by dumping and unsustainable. Why would the subsidies end?

            The only real solution is to actually make practical electric vehicles at an affordable price.

            Do you realize youre arguing against a method to achieve more affordable prices?

            • FireTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I think he is stating that by subsidizing Chinese vehicles way below what could be practical to sell subsided non-Chinese vehicles at China can effectively kill off the non-Chinese automotive manufacturing capacity over enough time. Once this has been achieved China can increase prices drastically as Americans would no longer have domestic car options to buy, and creating a monopoly.

                • FireTower@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yes but the alternative is not having to spend tons of money to subsidize private industry and not letting China profit off of American auto sales.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Considering we’re deficit spending with every budget cycle, I’d say no we don’t have the money. Furthermore, what about all the other brands sold in the US besides the three American ones of GM, Ford, and Tesla?

              • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Just like how people can no longer afford low end manufactured goods because China massively increased the prices once they took over that market, right?

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                The military and government contacts alone will keep the big 3 in business. They’re in no danger of a mom and pop Walmart situation.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s true and all but this decision is solely about oil barons and their fat fucking profits.

        Its no coincidence that they are going after electric cars and solar panels. Chinese workers have had it rough for 30 years but green tech is where we draw the line and not literally everything else, who believes this?

        Its not to protect the economy, it’s not to protect the Chinese workers.

        This is only about oil profits.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          China did the same thing with solar panels a decade ago. It’s the reason why my wife’s employer shut down and hundreds of people lost their job. Having endless money to subsidize your product and sell it well below cost doesn’t lead to more competition or better options. It puts everyone out of business and creates a monopoly for the country doing the subsidies who then has no reason to keep the price low.

      • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not the 80s any more. China has the largest middle class in the world, bigger than the population of most countries. 40% of the vehicles in service there are already electric. In the cities I visited it’s closer to 80%. Chinese shopping malls are filled with name brand western products and always busy. You’re either ignorant of the modern reality of China, or just a liar.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because China would be wise to subsidize their auto industry to sell at a loss just long enough to kill the American & European auto industry forcing us to buy Chinese vehicles.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember when trump was called out on his dumb little trade war (and rightfully so), but now that biden took the same trade war and escalated it, somehow it’s all good. Then these hypocrites wonder why people think both parties are the same.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s always fascinating to watch liberals attempting to distance themselves from their more overtly fascist cousins… yeah - totally nothing suspicious going on there.

        • Crikeste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, you’re just scared to face the reality that you actually have no power in this country, and the both sides are in fact the same. One just says the N word.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Anyone who thinks both sides are the same is head caved in stupid, not paying attention, or willfully lying.

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I would vote for a presidency that is for free trade. Allow these companies to mature in the market. Though in this case the technology in US cars is extremely behind. I mean were only just getting LFP in cars, and while 800v that allows for super fast charging is markedly common over there, it is in only a few models here. I’m not getting why we’re putting these companies under tariff, legacy doesn’t have an EV industry with the capacity to scale affordable EV. A lack of innovation is also something to mention. It really shouldn’t be considered a good thing when a 10 year old EV like the Bolt is a best seller. I wish the US legacy auto EV industry would either build a very basic aerodynamic economy EV with no tech nonsense for under 25k with 250 miles minimum or just leave it to Tesla and Chinese OEM. I mean all of them have abandoned the sedan and economy car market… Why not let the Chinese have that market share if they can’t build something comparable just put tariffs on Chinese SUV and trucks which is a segment that legacy auto can’t stop building.

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hopefully someone can tell me why this wont work, but what if they Chinese mfg did a Tesla and sold cars online and then shipped them over as “Sold” vehicles. I would do something like this out of spite, but if there are thousands of orders the cost of shipping can greatly be reduced over one or two “special orders” from China.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are so many ways american regulatory committees could call foul on this that it just isn’t worth it.

      It just wouldn’t be worth trouble and risk of delaying further the export of Chinese EVS.

      New Chinese electric vehicles exceeding international safety standards are already less than half as expensive as new American electric vehicles anyway, so even with a 100% tariff on top and whatever other taxes and fees, they’ll still be cheaper than new American EVS.