Boeing 747-400 with 468 people aboard was forced to make an emergency landing in Indonesia on Wednesday after one of its engines caught fire and began shooting out flames during takeoff.

The Garuda Indonesia flight was bound for Medina, Saudi Arabia, which is the entry point for many Muslims making their pilgrimage to Mecca. It left from Indonesia’s international airport in Makassar, where clips showed one of the plane’s four engines becoming engulfed in flames during takeoff on Wednesday evening.

Videos of the engine fire were shared online by JACDEC, a plane crash data evaluation firm, which showed that the flames began just as the plane had lifted from the runway.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is another article that claimed a jet engine burst into flames, when all that happened was an engine surge. The engine didn’t catch fire, the engine did the jet version of a backfire, and only once during the takeoff roll.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you for reading the article and educating us. The thumbnail image looks like the plane is about to disintegrate!

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      But but but muh clicks! Muh ad revenue!! Who the hell cares about my affect on society!? I need muh clicks!

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          How useful was your comment?

          We’re not a corporation, we’re not measured by any form of effectiveness or efficiency, we’re just people posting comments on a relatively obscure platform.

          Excuse me while I make childish comments about how absurd the media is. :/

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean they’re not wrong though that’s what it boils down to.

          Some dude in a suit throwing a fit because green number must go up.

        • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’d personally say it was useful. It’s a commentary on the article itself about the problem. Yes, Boeing has a HUGE problem lately, but is it actually worse than any other flying plane or jet manufacturer or is media hyping some of it up more because of recent events?

          I haven’t looked, but I would love to see stats of incidents of each airline compared to their entire running fleet. It may be like crimes per capita where yes there may be a lot reported, but really minor and small compared to the inventory actually flying.

          Is this an airline problem? A build problem? I am not an aviation aficionado so I honestly have no clue. I am not saying let Boeing off the hook for the shit they’ve pulled, but I want to know more in general about the aviation industry and safety.

          • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Minor incidents happen all the time in aviation. They have pretty high standards for what is considered an incident. There will always be incidents that can regularly be reported on.

            Boeing has some major safety issues. That is a real concern. However, national news is over reporting minor incidents with boeing planes, while being sure to mention boeing in the headline, because they know people will click on any article with boeing in the title. Scared people click on scary headlines.

            Incidents with other aircraft are reported locally, and they just say “airplane” in the title.