• Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, their evil plot finally laid bare. Copy what Mastercard and Visa have been doing since the 80s.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe they won’t suggest things you already bought, but will estimate what you’re going to buy next, based on the statistical analysis of people who bought the same things.

          • Poayjay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah it’s more like, hey you just bought stabilizing jacks and a water hose for a travel trailer. You must have just bought a new camper. Let’s bombard you with add for stick-up-hooks, rv-mattress sized sheets, cheap plastic dishes, etc.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      If only it was smart enough. Make its like oh you bought a newtv, you would like this new surround system

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          The “people usually both this with this product” suggestions can be pretty good to cover this.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.

        • ramirezmike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          you probably just notice that because it doesn’t make sense from your perspective.

          it’s probably more cost efficient for advertisers to just throw relevant ads at potential groups. Determining whether an individual already has the item is a waste of resources, and you probably don’t notice when the ads are things you don’t own.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.

            If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.

            If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn’t), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can’t already do.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s why the only safe software in the long term is Free Software.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Corpo apps are like

      “Do you love me? Rate 5 stars?”

      No I don’t love you. How about zero stars for sexual harassment? Do I need to talk to HR?

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fucking within like 2 minutes of using their apps too, they ask, “do you like the app?” Then another popup that says, “provide feedback for why you don’t like our app?”

        Because you keep getting in the way of me actually doing what I need to do. And it’s getting uninstalled as soon as I’m done with it.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s to the point where no one wants to do shit on their website anymore. They force you to download the app. So they can get even more access and control of your info. And like I need more motherfucking apps on my goddamn home screens. Fuck that shit.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’ll give you $2 or something like that if you give them consent. You would be surprised how well that works.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s very different, they want you to either pay or not have access. This would be you still having access, but being paid for giving them data voluntarily.

          That’s perfectly legal and employed across many European business entities.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      By showing you an annoying popup every time you use PayPal, and eventually you’ll accidentally click OK and it will mysteriously remember this and never ask you again.

  • palordrolap@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let me guess: I’ll buy a toaster because my old one died but then I’ll get ads for new toasters constantly. You bought one, you must want another. And another. And another. Why aren’t you buying more toasters. You bought one. Buy another! Buy twenty!! People who bought toasters also bought microwaves and kettles. Do you want a toaster? Does anyone want any toast?

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      “No, I don’t want any toast. No toast. No buns, baps, baguettes or bagels. No crumpets. No croissants. No teacakes, no potato cakes, and no hot cross buns. And definitely no smegging flapjacks.”

      Yeah, that’s the future with AI.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Given that God is infinite, and that the universe is also infinite. Would you like a toasted teacake?

    • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s amazing that these companies spend ultraquadrillions on advertisement platforms and algorithms and all they ever seem to do is just spam products at you that you have already purchased. Where is all this money going?

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did you not know they’re already selling your purchase data? All the card networks do it.

      That’s why you need to use cash to buy anything you don’t want logged to create a data point about you to be sold

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        For items or just the shop? Because I write EPOS systems for a living, and as far as I can tell, we pass no item data to the credit card merchants.

        The shop is obviously passed to them. So maybe don’t buy from Dave’s Enormous Dildo Emporium.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          The card companies can get data from the Merchant Category Code to infer the nature of purchases, without specifics. The stores also have a record of what items you bought, which could also be sold unless you have a contract with the store that guarantees they won’t sell your purchase history (at least in the countries without strong privacy laws)

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s per store though, presumably when they sign up with a payment provider (because there’s a lot of rules about e.g. using credit cards to gamble with).

            If I buy sex toys from Tesco, it’s still showing up as “groceries”. If I buy from a sex shop, it’s going to be more clear cut.

            I can see from my emails that PayPal send out itemised receipts on behalf of their customers, so they’re definitely collecting more data than the big two.

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    So happy I deleted my account with them 5 years ago after going throught their laughably bad customer protection (the only reason I had them to begin with, I had figured it was a good idea to have a buffer between merchants and my CC)

    In the end, it was perfect because, as they refused to help, I went straight to the credit card to reverse the fraudulent charge and closed all accounts with PayPal… Then I get a whiny email from them when the CC took the funds and left them holding the bag… Sweet minor victory

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Correct… In late stage capitalism “innovation” means breaking some laws (Air B&B, Uber), smoke and mirrors (AI) or outright scams (Theranos)

          This is why all these new “innovations” need to flood the market as hard and fast as possible… Before anyone notices what they really are

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Throw enough investor money at lawyers and anything is legal for an amount of time.

            “Oh, I’m sowwy, did we bweak the law? Well here’s 5,000 boxes of paper that say we didn’t, see you in 18 months.”

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The difference between selling your data and selling ads, is that only you can use your data. This is PayPal building a moat around its user private data so only they can use it.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hope they enjoy analzying my once-a-month subscription to FFXIV and nothing else.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Prepare to get inundated with ads for anime girls and other weeb shit.

      EDIT: To clarify, I mean “weeb” as a term of endearment rather than the pejorative.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would’ve loved to have a paypal alternative if so many damn services would adopt them.

    And no I’m not talking Google Pay or Apple Pay. They’re just as bad.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      How is Apple Pay just as bad? I haven’t heard anything that they do like this. There is no advertising in the Apple ecosystem. In fact, several places (like Walmart) don’t want to adopt the tap to pay because for some cards, it blocks tracking from them by using a pseudo randomized credit card number every time. It makes using the rewards for places a pain, but it works at maintaining harder tracking for whoever you’re paying.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      There really isn’t going to be, besides giving them your card directly (or paying crypto🤢). PayPal is less about the software and more about the service, which isn’t something FOSS can really replace. An alternative would have to have a company behind it that works with major financial institutes and whatnot.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    PayPal will use data from billions of customer transactions to supercharge its nascent ad business.

    The new PayPal Ads group is headed by recent hire Mark Grether, a senior vice president and GM at PayPal, who says the budding advertising operation will “help make merchants smarter to sell more products and services effectively, as well as enable consumers to discover more of what they love.”

    But, his reported statement doesn’t really dwell on the fact that it will be using customer data, including purchase history, to pull this off.

    In addition to the main PayPal platform, it also operates cash transfer app Venmo and Honey, a browser extension designed to find deals online.

    The report also mentions that Venmo will see fewer ads served in order to not drive off its younger users.

    PayPal’s data on users’ purchases and other transactions, combined with AI, might prove to be great at advertising, though probably to the consternation and frustration of recipients.


    The original article contains 366 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m surprised that they haven’t been doing this from the start tbh. Obviously they’ve been selling your data to whoever, which is really the same I guess.