• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is it definitely a W if a government allows privacy-invasive, legally grey and copyrighted-material-stealing technologies?

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If the government allows it, they are per definition not “legally Grey”.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think it’s “legally grey” in the sense that governments have largely made no policies one way or the other on the data harvesting. It’s not banned, but it’s not openly encouraged either, and there’s no real legal precedent to point to for this specific matter besides the general data harvesting big tech does.

        The area with the largest similarity I feel is music sampling, and as far as I know, the music industry was very quick to ensure that data harvesting for AI had to follow the same copyright laws as sampling.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are many laws that go entirely against the constitution of a country. You can start by looking at DMCA laws that violate a bunch of rights in MANY countries. Legally gray is falling short, those are illegal, and still get enforced because $$$

    • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a much much bigger issue than this. Would you rather live in a world where other countries have good AI and you do not? Would you like it if only China has powerful AI? I get the copyright issue, but some things are more important than other things. This is an arms race, and everyone slowing down isn’t exactly an option.

      • CheeseCakeCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It seems like you severely misunderstand what “AI” as we have it nowadays is (it’s not actual AI) and what it is capable (not very much) and most importantly not capable of (most things it is advertised to do). Even if investor magazines and tech CEOs try to make it seem like that, we’re not one step away from creating HAL9000. LLMs are extremely over hyped and in the most areas they have been deployed a straight up dysfunctional scam. The only arms race that is happening right now is about who can waste the most money and violate the most privacy laws with this nonsense while all the necessary data centers and their insane power and water demands accelerate the destruction of our environment even more.

        • Hackworth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m happy to take the time to alter your perspective, if you are open to new information.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The term “AI” has been in use since 1956 to describe a wide variety of computer algorithms and capabilities. Neural nets and large language models fall very firmly under the term’s umbrella.

          What you’re talking about is a specific kind of AI, artificial general intelligence (AGI). Very few people believe that an LLM on its own can become AGI and even fewer believes that current LLMs are AGI, so unfortunately you’re jousting with a strawman here.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They’re not claiming it’s AGI, though. You’re missing a broad middle ground between dumb calculators and HAL 9000.

            • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              If you are genuinely open to understanding the path we are on, the new situational awareness paper would be very eye-opening. It is 160 pages, so it’s probably a bit too much to get through, but there are really good videos that explain it. Matthew Berman has a great video about it. I’m not interested in swaying you and not going to debate, I’m 100s of hours deep into this and have been absolutely obsessed with it. Nobody doubted its impact as much as me. Education on the matter will undeniably change your mind tremendously. The information is there if you want a peak at the future.

              https://situational-awareness.ai/