• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still hear people praising Thomas “piece of shit reason we didn’t have wireless charging a hundred years ago” Edison.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But I have to wonder if Edison’s vision of a DC electrical grid might have been environmentally better in the long run, as it would have been very, very decentralized, with a small power station necessary every couple of kilometers. It might have spurred an accelerated study into renewable sources of electricity, such as wind, even decades and decades ago.

      As things turned out, Tesla/Westinghouse’s victory with AC allows these centralized and “too big to fail” behemoths to suck coal and spit out black smoke out of sight and out of mind for most people.

      • Doug7070@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bold of you to assume that wouldn’t have just resulted in a coal burning power station every couple kilometers…

        • niktemadur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          At first, absolutely yes, coal smoke everywhere, creating an untenable crisis within the cities themselves. That type of crisis would have been tackled as a priority, would have been an integral part of the loudest political dialogues and arguments, decades ago.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            They already had coal pollution everywhere. And they had a solution for that.

            Which was “make the poor people live in the path of the smoke”.

            • niktemadur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That can’t be done as easily if you have a power plant every mile or so. The issue would affect everyone to some extent, rich and poor. That would have been the issue with Direct Current, it would have been impossible to keep it out of sight and out of mind.

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most of those would be small though. Like the size of a small factory. And most people in the UK would have had plenty of those within a mile of their house, right up until we offloaded all our manufacturing to China.

                Even a full sized coal plant isn’t objectionably dirty enough that people would demand an alternative. We only moved mostly to gas because it was cheaper (and that’s where renewables will eventually win again). There’s one less than two miles from my house. It would be nice if it wasn’t there, but the air is far from unbreathable. If a small coal plant every few miles was the price of having electricity, people would put up with it.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get what your saying, but I think the benefits of DC power plants would have been short term, rather than long term.

        Once scaling was introduced there’s no way Edison DC power stations every block would make any sense materially, financially or societally.

        I can’t blame Tesla for toxic capitalism any more than I can blame the wright brothers for manipulative airline ticket prices today.

        Same reason we didn’t have electric cars a hundred years ago

        Unregulated capitalism and undeveloped antitrust laws are the culprit with respect to centralization, not innovation.

  • Raisin8659@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All of them is most likely the most accurate answer. The tilted examples would be: Genghis Khan is widely admired as a hero by the Mongolians and almost universally hated by others. Leopold II is admired by the Belgians but would be a criminal, probably crimes against humanity, today.

    A Congolese man, Nsala, looking at the severed hand and foot of his five-year-old daughter who was killed and allegedly cannibalized by members of the Force Publique in 1904, as a result of Leopold’s policy.

    • guangming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had a book assigned for history class that totally and forever changed my understanding of Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World I think it’s called.

      Dude and his empire basically singlehandedly spread the written word, religious freedom, and lots of other ideas we generally consider good today. Not saying he didn’t kill a lot, because he did, but his historical impact is much more complex than “barbarian invader kills a bunch of people”

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mother Theresa, Barack Obama, Winston Churchill, and Ronald Reagan to name the first few that occur to me before coffee. I can probably think of less obvious ones later.

    Edit: Y’all I miss The Before Times too and it’s great we were able to get a nonwhite POTUS; I was talking about his drone strike and deportation track record more than anything else.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The stories that Christopher Hitchens told about Mother Teresa were largely made up. For example, the reason that her hospices didn’t give opiate painkillers to their patients wasn’t a belief that poor people deserve to be in pain … it was that they weren’t doctors, so they could not legally possess opiates. India has drug laws too!

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even ceding that, she still defended convicted sexual predators. The whole Catholic church is essentially a rogue nation shielding pederasty across the globe. Anyone they would canonize is suspect in my view.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I liked reading about his misadventures in youth, and he did look pretty grand sitting on a horse, but yeah. Practically every president is a terrible person

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is one of those times where we just aren’t in the same universe. You might as well be writing in wingdings font for all the sense you make to me.

    • waterbogan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why is this so far down? Not a nice person

      some verified, well-documented quotes from Guevara himself:

      • “Individualism must disappear!”

      • “I am the most important thing in the world…” (I suppose the irony escaped him.)

      • “Certainly, we execute! And we will continue executing as long as it is necessary!”

      • “We don’t need proof. We manufacture the proof.”

      • “Besides, to execute a man we don’t need proof of his guilt. We only need proof that it’s necessary to execute him. It’s that simple.”

      • “I’d like to confess, Papa, at that moment I discovered that I really like killing.”

      • “The happiest days of a youth’s life is when he watches his bullets reaching an enemy.”

      • “The people’s cooperation can often be coaxed by the use of systemic terror.”

  • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Winston Churchill. It doesn’t take a lot of digging to realise he was absolutely a racist and white supremacist little shit. Even “judged by the morals of the time” people recognised just how aweful he truly was.

    Yes, his contributions to the defeat of the Nazis is undeniably great. He was a good wartime prime minister and that shouldn’t be overlooked. This doesn’t excuse some of the more heinous things he’s said and done.

    Shamefully, the British education system failed spectacularly on this point. I grew up believing he was some paragon of moral good and justice and the school system did nothing to counter this. We’d all rather believe he was a great man. If he is, as they say, “the greatest Briton”, were fucked.

    “I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.” - Winston Churchill 1937

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was young Napoleon was generally admired and considered a “great man”. A guy who laid most of Europe to waste in pursuit of his personal power.

  • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like all the kings.

    Probably the worst bastards you can imagine, because if they were not, the worst bastard would take his place in som bastards way.

  • 3laws@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Albert Einstein. He was as misogynistic as you can w/o committing any crime.