• RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why does patreon even need to be an app? What value does the app bring that the website can’t deliver?

    • astanix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      There are a lot of people out there that will not use a website and only use an app for things. I’m willing to bet there’s some users of patreon on ios that don’t even know there is a website.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        4 months ago

        OnlyFans doesn’t have an app but they’re still in business. We must educate people about not relying on apps for everything.

      • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        definitely. i know so many people from my school who’s iphone home screen is just… pages full of apps. we’re talking 40+ apps on average. they always say it’s weird how i use a website for almost everything, and then they complain about their storage space :/

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        I tend to use whatever has the best user experience. I don’t use a browser for lemmy as an example.

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Does this mean Patreon too will have two tiers of billing system: standard billing via the Web and slightly higher prices if done in app. I think if one purchases a YouTube Premium membership in app on iOS, it costs more than when done via the site.

        • faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, that’s exactly what they’re doing. If you have a Patreon, you must choose between increasing patreon price on Apple specifically compared to Android and Web, or you can keep the price the same, in which case you will earn less from users using iOS in-app purchase

      • minyaen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unfortunately, I think you hit the nail on the head. Apple knows this too. Also, unfortunate for those Apple-sheep 🙄

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Background play of exclusive podcasts for one thing. I suppose that might be possible in a browser but playing media from a media player app instead of a browser is certainly going to be a better experience.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Just offer file downloads. I swear the society is regressing technologically speaking (not aiming at you OP)

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Every podcast I support on Patreon provides a link that you can plug into your podcatcher to subscribe. I don’t need the Patreon app to listen to the podcast then, just Pocket Casts or whatever I’m using for all my podcasts.

        Even the video links are YouTube links.

        I don’t doubt that the app makes life easier in some ways, but the website works just fine.

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          The main shows definitely that is the case for me as well - but there are also Patreon exclusive audio releases that don’t go out on the rss feed for Morning, Somewhere for instance. I also follow shows with exclusive video releases on Patreon that don’t ever go to YouTube and I still get the benefit of a dedicated media app with background play.

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          For some reason, some developers get away with it… But that practice is specifically prohibited by Apple. Maybe the exception is for app developers that had a pre-existing deal before the rule went into effect or something, but directing users out of the app and into a web browser will get your app update denied. If Patreon were in a position to make that deal, they probably wouldn’t be catching hell like this from Apple in the first place.

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      PWA should be the way. As long as the website is mobile responsive, PWA should be preferred in cases like this.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 months ago

        They lost it in the EU, but did it change for the rest of the world? Can’t really read from the article what region they are talking about.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ll hinge their position on the least good faith interpretation of EU’s anticompetitive lawsuits, and why wouldn’t they, they make more money in between these lawsuits than they pay EU for breaking the rules.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes and no. EU told them they need to let other app stores on their devices. Apple did their typical non-compliant song and dance, making devs jump through all kinds of absurd hoops and at the end of it all they still have to pay Apple 26% or something, so basically complete non-compliance. The EU has yet to do anything about it, as far as I can tell.

      They also denied Epic’s request, stating that their install button looks too much like Apple’s.

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hold up (fta):

    By this November, all creators can only offer a subscription-based plan on iOS as the app store doesn’t support other formats, such as first-of-the-month or per-creation plans. As a result, Patreon is rolling out a 16-month-long migration process that will shift all memberships to subscriptions by November 2025. At that point, subscription-based plans will be the only option available, unfortunately proving Apple’s far-reaching power.

    I’m unclear on what this means: is Patreon eliminating first-of-the-month and per-creation plans on ALL platforms? Or just on Apple platforms?

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      THIS is why we hate Apple. Their bullshit affects EVERYONE. There is no “don’t like it don’t use it” with these people.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seems like it’s a backend change and they’re removing per creation entirely. Got an email from one of the creators I follow about getting suggestions on how to restructure their tiers for the new system. My guess is it would be tricky to setup a way to have creators do android/web tiers and apple tiers, not to mention confusing. And of course they can’t just pull a Spotify and have a pop-up that says ‘sorry you must use the web to subscribe’ on iPhones.

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hmm. Maybe they were finding it hard to manage and just found the perfect excuse.

          Maybe they are planning on starting subscription scams like other companies.

          Who knows. I just know to stay away from automated payments.

  • Ravi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Easy solution: the app only redirects you to the website via browser intent.

    • hahattpro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is no good with Apple policy.

      App cannot tell user that they get better deal anywhere.

      • nintendiator@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        So wait, Apple effectively mandates that users of their store lie to their users? Wonder if that’s something that can be tackled legally.

    • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Get this, they don’t allow that either. There are multiple clips from LTT talking about dumb things like this that Apple doesn’t allow

  • NathanClayton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why don’t they just do what Kindle does? Say that you can no longer subscribe from the application and to subscribe from the site?

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Apple has explicit rules against redirecting customers to other sites for payment. I think they have a special deal with Amazon for that wording.