• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    "Remote work is not compatible with a high ambition level plus high speed,” Pei said in the email, telling employees who are worried about flexibility that “this is a company for grown ups.”

    Sounds like he actually means it’s a company for exploitable young people and socopathic assholes. Grown-ups have other responsibilities and don’t want work to commandeer their whole lives.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      28 days ago

      “This company is for grown ups. Now sit over there where I can check on you constantly and do what I tell you like a child that can’t be trusted alone.”

      • zondo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        The actual sentence, according to a Verge website comment, was: “This is a company for grown ups, so if you need to be out of office to deal with some issues, we trust you to make the right decision.” If true, this doesn’t reflect well on Verge journalism.

        • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I don’t care about Verge. I care about the person who cons others into toiling underpaid so that they can Lambo and talk shit to magazines.

    • niemcycle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      28 days ago

      Guarantee this is a ploy to chase off the ‘less committed’ employees (read: less desperate), while not having to announce mass layoffs.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      The real problem is that Nothing brings… nothing to the table. Oh look, another startup making another Android phone in a sea of companies making Android phones, with yet another skin.

  • eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    This just means they’re a struggling company who needs to cut headcount and want to do it without paying severance

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      28 days ago

      In addition, this tactic will result in the best employees leaving first, because they’ll get employed somewhere else.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      It’s such bullshit too because drastically changing someone’s working conditions is clearly a constructive dismissal and should lead to severance payments.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    The way this usually works out is you loose all the good employees and you’re left with the dregs who were unable to find another remote position in time.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    And Nothing is going to fire you if you don’t find a creative way to meet their bullshit attendance metrics.

    I love being treated like a gradeschooler. Really boosts my morale, especially with nearly two fucking decades of experience and being on the wrong side of 35.

    Stop bothering me and let me do my fucking job, for christ’s sake.

    Edit: all that said, the company name does make for an amusing headline

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      28 days ago

      This is an interesting approach from the CEO, in that it demonstrates why unions are mandatory.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’d meet those rules out of spite, and do a really crappy job while there. They’d essentially be forced to fire me, and I’d consider suing for wrongful termination in not providing a suitable work environment for me to do my job (evidence is my productivity before and after being forced back to the office).

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    27 days ago

    uhhhh…

    anyone else totally misinterpret the lede to mean “there’s no reason to go to work at an office” lol?

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I wanna see them pay for office hours AND commute hours. In a big city you easily have 1+ hour a day irrevocably lost to commuting.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        So glad I live in California. A faulty security gate once prevented me from leaving my job on time. Which pushed me past 12 hours on shift, which automatically meant I was earning twice my hourly wage while I waited. Plus it required a mandatory additional meal break, which I couldn’t take. Since I couldn’t take it, I was automatically given an additional full hour’s wage, as required by state law.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          I’m glad I don’t work for a company that forces me to go through a security gate, and I’m glad we don’t track hours. I get paid salary, and I rarely work more than 8 hours in a given day, and my average hours worked per week is usually under 40.

          It’s nice you had some protections, but those protections really shouldn’t be necessary.

          • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            27 days ago

            You’re lucky. Many people on salary end up working overtime with no pay increase.

            Once again, there are good managers & (far too frequently) bad (Elon loving cockwomble) managers

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Being salaried doesn’t remove you from those protections, at least in Europe. You get overtime, which is either 1.5x pay or you accumulate PTO.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              27 days ago

              In the US most salaried positions are not eligible for overtime. Unfortunately, California has yet to close that loophole.

              The next job above me is salaried. If I were to get a promotion, I’d be making about 2/3 of my current income because I would lose all of the hourly protections I have. Despite a higher base pay.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Wow. Now I don’t want to go to the US even harder than before.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        If I’m reading that right, the decision was reversed by the 9th circuit.

        The District Court originally dismissed the case, ruling that the security checks were made after the regular work shift and therefore not “an integral and indispensable part” of the job. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, ruling that the checks were necessary to the principal work of the job.[2][3]

        • Teepo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          The US Supreme Court then reversed the Ninth Circuit ruling. You’re quoting the background that gives context to the case in the lixned article.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      28 days ago

      As a customer, why do you care if the employees are wfh or not lol

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        Because you vote with your money.

        As long as those businesses keep receiving money, they will continue these malpractices and damage the market.

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    Open plan offices fucken suck.

    Noise, constant distractions, and that one arsehole who never covers their mouth when they sneeze, sending a wave of infectious germs rolling out across the office floor.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      28 days ago

      God I remember how the flu used to just rip through the office come wintertime… Since switching to remote work, I think I’ve taken 1 sick day this year.

    • BillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m in an open floor plan with cubicles. There is one asshole who has an office, he insists on having loud conversations, with his door open, on mother fucking speakerphone through his tinny laptop speakers. I’ve resorted to a white noise playlist on Spotify. He’s a client, so not cool telling him to fuck off.

  • FergusonBishop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    27 days ago

    “this is a company for adults” says the CEO of a company who slaps “Glyph” lights on knockoff iPhones and calls it innovative. I hate when I see Carl Pei’s smug face pop up every few months. Hey Carl - put a fucking charger in the box. OnePlus is thriving without you.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I won’t buy anything that isn’t stock Android. Sick of never being able to find anything.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        No devices have “stock Android” though. Even the Pixel is a customized version of Android. Vanilla AOSP doesn’t even have a usable phone dialer included with it.

      • RubyRhod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        Not sure what you’re saying… ru referencing Nothing OS, or Oxygen… or…?

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Anything that isn’t a Pixel, pretty much. Every single manufacturer seems to think it’s their duty to replace all the settings screens with their own custom bullshit.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I have a hypothesis that anyone who is required to be on site without having to do a hands-on thing (e.g. physical maintenance or repair) is actually a garden hermit, that is, hired to perform as an extra for the pleasure of viewing upper management.

    I also have a hypothesis that a lot of company budget and material goes towards handling and pacifying upper management (e.g. the way a binky pacifies an infant) since they are accustomed to being coddled and not accustomed to actually managing.

    To be fair, I’ve only been able to observe the relationships between clerical class and management class in a handful of companies, including a small one-store CD-Rom reseller and Bechtel Corporation circa 1990, but my observations have been consistent between them.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      I have a hypothesis that anyone who is required to be on site without having to do a hands-on thing (e.g. physical maintenance or repair) is actually a garden hermit, that is, hired to perform as an extra for the pleasure of viewing upper management.

      They’re Type 1 Bullshit Jobs, aka “Flunkies”

      Flunky jobs primarily exist to make someone else look or feel important. Throughout recorded history, rich and powerful people would surround themselves with servants, clients, sycophants, and minions of one sort or another.

  • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Excuse for layoff. What I hear from the article is a CEO, who himself is not a grown up, crying me, me, me, my company, my profit, selfish behavior without any concern for his employees who have largely contributed to his startup success.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Humans have a “me” problem in general. The secret is not to create conditions for it to manifest itself.

      Anti-monopoly laws, unions, distribution of power, openness, readiness to break nonsense laws, stubbornness in defending important laws, understanding of common sense both in following and in breaking the law, and the same that applies to laws applies to any moral principles.

      You know, consciousness of good and evil, wisdom of all the enormous amount of good literature available for anyone able to read in English and other most spoken languages.

      Just being human and understanding that no device of human making can “solve” human nature.

      I’d say Tolkien and Lewis on the fantasy side, Heinlein and Asimov and Simak on the sci-fi side, and Lem in between them. Some Jules Verne and Sabatini would be good too. I have a reflex to Russian classics due to having been force-fed them in childhood, but there are things worth learning. And Lucian of Samosata.

      Carpe diem, memento mori, astra inclinant sed non obligant. OK, I think my head needs a reboot.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        When it comes to addressing the “me” problem, Buddha has to be on the list of people with advice worth checking out. Ego issues may run deep, but modern capitalism encourages and nurtures the worst of them. A lot of what we face today isn’t due to any unchangeable human nature, but capitalists will try to persuade us it is, because that undermines our will to grow past the system that serves them.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Thank you, yes, Buddha is.

          I also forgot Tao Te Ching.

          but modern capitalism encourages and nurtures the worst of them

          We-ell, one of the reasons I emotionally hate communism is because I’ve grown in Russia and have deep acquaintance with some things which were being planted just like you describe, but by Soviet education.

          An example: someone has a hobbyist project, that project becomes useful for their group, the group (without any participation) takes pride in it as “our” project, then later that someone makes a weak squeal about not even credit, but their own wishes to continue their hobby by their own understanding, the group judges them heavily and makes them repent. In Soviet moralist stories the person with the initiative would be the one to blame for “selfishness”, while their contribution would be considered “as expected” (because they owe the “collective” everything they can do), so the rest of the group who’ve done nothing useful would be “better” (because they don’t have to do anything, just use what belongs to the “collective”) and that person would have to redeem themselves. No irony, no nuance, just this.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    27 days ago

    If they are a company for grown ups why is he acting all controlling like an insecure little child instead of trusting in his employees like a brave adult?

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    28 days ago

    So this is a company whose foundation was work from home and thus has that as it’s background culture? Yeah this is just an excuse for layoffs without paying.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      Instead of a planned layoff, it’s a layoff of random people, with a bias towards laying off the most capable.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      “We have just opened our new corporate office in Bumfuck, Nowhere! We’d like to thank the county of Bumfuck for their generous grant of taxpayer dollars. Now all employees will be required to work in person or be terminated for cause.”