About time. This also applies to their older models such as M2 and M3 laptops.

In the U.S., the MacBook Air lineup continues to start at $999, so there is no price increase associated with the boost in RAM.

The M2 macbook air now starts at $1000 for 16GB RAM and 256GB storage. Limited storage aside, that’s surprisingly competitive with most modern Windows laptops.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I dunno if I’d even consider them an industry leader, unless you break down their ubiquity by industry category (in which they lead graphic design and maybe video editing, iirc). They lead phone sales in the US by a lot, but their overall desktop share is still relatively small (<10%), and their global footprint is buoyed only by iOS (which is still below Windows and Android).

      I would say they’re an innovator, and they push certain companies to innovate, but they don’t really lead by that many metrics.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    insultingly tiny, unupgradeable storage aside, that’s surprisingly competitive with most modern Windows laptops

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s not ideal, but you’re getting probably the best hardware in the market in return. The M series still dominates Windows CPUs, and the build quality on most $1000 laptops leaves a lot to be desired.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        9 days ago

        build quality on most $1000 laptops

        You’re not kidding.

        I have a couple of laptops from various vendors, and they’re all built like shit.

        ASUS is especially eyerolly: the case is literally crumbling into pieces. Like seriously? You couldn’t have picked a material that’s not literally going to disintegrate in two years on a $1200 laptop?

        • simple@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, a lot of manufacturers are just bad. I knew people who had Dell and MSI laptops and those things feel like toys. Cheap plastic and very wobbly hinges. The only manufacturer I genuinely trust is Lenovo. My Legion is a bit thick but I can at least rest easy that it’s built well.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Lenovo is, outside of their really cheap consumer options - like, the $500-and-under options - are pretty solid.

            But yeah build quality is one reason when I roll my eyes at the ‘haha stupid buying apple! apple tax! lol ripped off!’ crowd: I mean maybe, but as soon as you pick up a Macbook whatever it’s immediately obvious that you’re getting something for what you’re paying, and not some bendy flexy piece of plastic crap that will maybe physically survive the warranty period, but not much more.

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            I saw someone’s Samsung laptop last year and the screen was wobbling all over the fucking place. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. I commented on it, and the owner just gave me a blank look.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The best? Debatable. You ever watch Louise on YouTube? He constantly rags on bad hardware design when repairing MacBooks lol.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The localllama people are feeling quite mixed about this, as they’re still charging through the nose for more RAM. Like, orders of magnitude more than the bigger ICs actually cost.

    It’s kinda poetic. Apple wants to go all in on self-hosted AI now, yet their incredible RAM stinginess over the years is derailing that.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I do have a 64gb m1 MacBook Pro and man that thing screams at doing LLM AI. I use it to serve models locally throughout my house, while it otherwise still works as a fantastic computer (usually using about half the ram for llm usage). I still prefer a 4080 for image generation though.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just in time for 32gb to become the necessary standard, so they can still sell you egregiously overpriced ram upgrades.

    • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I can’t imagine that being the case for most users. I’m absolutely a power user and I keep being surprised at how consistently high the performance is of my base model M1 Air w/16GB even when compared to another Mac workstation of mine with 64GB.

      I can run two VMs, a ton of live loading development tooling, several JVM programs and so much more on that little Air and it won’t even sweat.

      I’m not an Apple apologist - lots of poor decisions these days and software quality has taken a real hit. While 16GB means everyone’s getting a machine that should last much longer, I can’t see a normal user needing more any time soon, especially when Apple is optimizing their local machine learning models for their 8GB iOS platforms first and foremost.

    • LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think the next thing people should complain about is the abysmal 256 GB of storage. That’s barely enough to fit the OS plus updates at this point. Should be at least 512 GB, given how basically free NVMe storage is these days.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        my windows gaming laptop had a 256gb nvme drive in it. I didnt find it to obtrussive outside of the inability to willy nilly install things from steam. I did eventually upgrade to a 512gb samsung nvme, but almost entirely cause i found a sale that was too good to let pass.

        I dont know how much space iOS takes up, though.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The M2 macbook air now starts at $1000 for 16GB RAM and 256GB storage. Limited storage aside, that’s surprisingly competitive with most modern Windows laptops.

    What do you mean limited storage aside?

    If we disregard the fact that it’s terrible value for money, it’s a good deal. No laptop sold in 2025 and costing over a grand, should have anything less than a terabyte.

  • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Completely laughable. Literally had 16 GB of DDR3-1600 for my 2600K from 2011 that I handed down to a kid nephew for their first PC to tinker with. Hell, my local NAS has more than that…

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 days ago

      We use windows PCs at work as software engineers now, but when I was training I used a MacBook Pro M1 with 16GB of RAM and that thing was incredibly performant.

      I know it in vogue to shit in Apple, but they build the hardware and the software and they’re incredibly efficient at what they do and I don’t think I ever saw the beachball loading icon thing.

      Now the prices they charge to upgrade the RAM is something I can get behind shitting on.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The chip and OS won’t do shit when your ram is saturated by electron apps taking 800MB each. Maybe MacOS behaves better under very high memory pressure than windows does, but it doesn’t mean it’s okay to rip off consumers. That whole 8GB on mac = 16GB on windows has been bullshit all along, and is mostly based on people looking at the task manager and seeing high ram usage on windows (which is a good thing)

        • Sh0ckw4ve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Haha no MacOs is not better performing under very high memory pressure. Rip me working on a macbook air.

          I have to make sure not to run too many things at once…

          • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Now that I think of it yeah, my work mac simply shows a popup telling me to kill an app. It just doesn’t deal with high mem pressure lol

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can use Linux with RAM compression to have the same kind of economy that MacOS does.

        Just nobody bothers.

      • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I know it’s in vogue to shit on Apple…

        Apple does have a lot of vertical integration which allows first party stuff to function well and they work closely with a lot of their premium 3rd party software partners, but you try running an actual RAM hungry process like a local LLM model, for example, and all but the highest end latest edition MacBook Pro WILL shit the bed.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fucking PHONES had more RAM. It was so fucking stupid. And despite their arguments, it was proven time and time again 8GB was not enough.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Perfect, just when I’ve decided 16GB is the bare minimum these days too. My day to day I max out 16 on my laptops without even trying. 32 is my new minimum.

  • Player2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    And here I thought that 8GB on Mac was at least as good as 16GB on plebian PCs.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yep! With apples new patent pending upgrade process, it’s super easy!

      You take the device that you want to upgrade and you throw it in the garbage and then you go to an Apple store and you pick up the upgraded model! It’s so streamlined!

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Their sales figures seem to show that the majority of people don’t care. For my needs when I’m using my MacBook, I’m one of those people who don’t care. That’s probably because it’s not my main PC, so I use it for the things most people probably use it for (browsing, watching media, some light work).

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    People don’t want the 8gb ram because they are all used to windows I bet it.