• Tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Why l would pay 30$ to dumpester fire OS to use it securely for another year when l could install Linux for free with more than 7 year security?

    And consumers can only pay for single year.

    It just shows how M$ doesn’t care about their costumers treating them like lab rats.

    • HC4L@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      I switched to Linux myself but can we please stop lying about Linux being a drop-in replacement? There is enough sofware that does not work.

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        A lot of Linux users here think the conversation begins and ends with game support. A lot of us use our computers for work and there is a lot of productivity and creative software that does not play nice with Linux. I’ve probably said this a dozen times here before but I’ll say it again: Not all of us use our computers solely for gaming.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I’m a Linux user and I think the conversation should be:

          More than half (over 60% ackshually) of Windows PCs in service are still Windows 10. Windows 11 barely cracks 34%.

          People should boycott this and demand that Microsoft offer long-term support for Windows 10 like they did Windows 7 and stop trying to force Windows 11 on consumers through dark patterns like this. We have a year to make a huge about this deal in public spaces. This is the kind of thing the reddit userbase used to excel at getting word out about. Enough public outcry over a year could force the issue.

          They made their own bed with the arbitrary TPM 2.0 requirement. They can drop that and they’d probably have more adoption of 11 overnight. These are business choices Microsoft is making, while ignoring the reality on the ground for a lot of people who never upgraded to something with a TPM 2.0 chip. It’s a choice to and a dark pattern to push them to upgrade.

          I am kind of sick of the Linux users acting superior instead of being helpful to people stuck with Windows due to work environments, too.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m a Linux User (fuck windows) but I’m stuck with the wife wanting to use windows. So yeah I’ll always be on the lookout for helpful ways to keep that shit software from causing security problems in my home network.

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Absolutely. Especially software that has to interface with specific hardware, which often times can have issues working properly with Windows VMs.

        I can just dedicate some old hardware for baremetal Win10, but not everyone has that luxury.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      They don’t expect home users to pay. Remember that they often refuse to even reboot their computers to receive security updates.

      Extended support is pretty much intended exclusively for enterprises.