• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Android APK shipping this weekend

    Source first. I ain’t touching an APK without seeing code.

    Nothing related to Loops on the Pixelfed GitHub yet.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Got mine yesterday when we were out. Told my kid that it would be a non-corporate alternative to TikTok. She couldn’t have been less interested. Sigh.

  • HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hot take: let this brain rot format die already. If you cannot hold your attention for longer than a few minutes at a time, you might want to work on that instead of embracing it.

    • AHasshacked@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It really depends on how you implement it. Look up Jaden Williams or ailaughatmyjokes (Silvia), some of their videos could be a really good example of how to do good shorts.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        There are several content creators that started with short video and then moved on on Youtube that I just love and adore. Their short stuff is good. But when they aren’t constrained by the format and can do whatever they want, they do videos that are so much better it’s unbelievable.

    • Akrenion@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Current research suggests that declining attention is most likely caused by an expectation of quality rather than actual personal issues. Condensing information is a valuable skill an people do not have time for middle length content just to be disappointed.

      • HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You might want to give some sources for that claim.

        This article from Time summarizes quite well my view of the issues related to attention span. This is certainly not limited to the likes of tiktok or twitter, but I think those can be considered as representing two of the worst platform formats for meaningful content.

        • Akrenion@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This article at bbc references the time as misguided.

          This article shows that measuring attention spans is not that easy and our world is more distracting. Not a good think but it does not blame the people.

          This Booktuber got some sources and a nice way of presenting it.

          One might argue I am splitting hairs and I do not blame you if you think that. I hope some people think harder about their focus and how to find some calm moments. Yet I say that while searching up sources because I got a mobile notification.

      • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        But then how am I supposed to use your “research” to make imaginary claims on generational attention spans ?

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you not think some people doomscroll lemmy, only reading titles and looking at image posts?

      • HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, there are those people, but that’s not the point here. Lemmy doesn’t enforce some arbitrary short length to its posts in an attempt to force the users to engage more with the platform instead of the actual content. The same cannot be said of tiktok or twitter, for example.

  • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I still feel like they seem to be building a bit too much hype to what’s going to be just another type of social media in the fediverse with scarce posts made by almost exclusively tech enthusiasts

          • sgnl@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wanna source that? Cause I’ve been following loops a bit and haven’t seen anything close to that. If anything it’s the opposite.

              • sgnl@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                What exactly is a red flag there? It seems pretty boilerplate from a quick skim.

                • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I believe the section of concern was

                  Contributions: The Services may invite you to chat, contribute to, or participate in blogs, message boards, online forums, and other functionality during which you may create, submit, post, display, transmit, publish, distribute, or broadcast content and materials to us or through the Services, including but not limited to text, writings, video, audio, photographs, music, graphics, comments, reviews, rating suggestions, personal information, or other material (“Contributions”). Any Submission that is publicly posted shall also be treated as a Contribution.

                  You understand that Contributions may be viewable by other users of the Services and possibly through third-party websites.

                  When you post Contributions, you grant us a license (including use of your name, trademarks, and logos): By posting any Contributions, you grant us an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide right, and license to: use, copy, reproduce, distribute, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, store, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part), and exploit your Contributions (including, without limitation, your image, name, and voice) for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, your Contributions, and to sublicense the licenses granted in this section. Our use and distribution may occur in any media formats and through any media channels.

                  This license includes our use of your name, company name, and franchise name, as applicable, and any of the trademarks, service marks, trade names, logos, and personal and commercial images you provide.

            • saltesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              They said they believe.

              Only knowledge has sources; but beliefs sound cool.

              I don’t know why I used a semicolon there, but it’s staying.