Assuming I have a time horizon >10 years.

Edit: thanks for all the replies!!

  • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 天前

    Yes, and actually with low amounts of money to work with you can make your contributions very efficient. To best spend save for retirement, choose the first option from this list that applies to you (and if you are able to save more later, go down the list after exhausting each option):

    • 401k up to maximum company match
    • pay off high-interest (>4%) debt
    • IRA up to the contribution limit
    • investment-type HSA up to the limit
    • max out 401k contribution
    • personal investment account without tax advantage

    For most people, it’s recommended to use a traditional 401k and a Roth IRA, but it varies by situation. As for what to invest in, I would recommend a popular low cost ETF or index fund, like Vanguard or SPY. You can also look into ESGs if you want to do good with your money, but your expected earnings may be lower. I’m in ETHO and TICRX.

    You might check out fire@lemmy.ml or personalfinance@lemmy.ml if you have questions about getting started.

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 天前

    That’s 600/yr and a long enough horizon that most diverse portfolios are likely to be net positive (I’m seeing about 5,000 gained with 8% growth in a basic savings calculator)

    I’d spend those 10 years trying to free up cash flow but time’s a powerful weapon regardless

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 天前

    As much as I hate to send you to Reddit, the r/personalfinance flowchart is hard to beat for most people. I’d recommend you start there to make sure you’re not overlooking something like your emergency fund.

    Reddit’s r/personalfinance flowchart for personal income

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 天前

      Is there a reason to focus on 401k (beyond the employer match) before HSA? Isn’t HSA more tax savings advantageous, even if just limited to health care expenses?

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        I’m not certain why they have HSA after 401k and IRA, but some possible things I can think of:

        • HSAs can be harder to take advantage of of the triple tax benefit if you’re retiring early (that is, still younger and healthier)
        • HSAs probably have worse investment options than an IRA
        • Allowing the user to optimize their Roth vs Traditional mix

        Again, I don’t really know because you’re right about the HSA triple tax advantage making it seem better than IRA or 401k, but I’m sure there was a reason given if you care to trawl the subreddit.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 天前

      hard to beat for most people.

      *Utterly irrelevant for most people

      Sorted that for you. What the hell is 401k, Roth, medical debt?

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 天前

        Financial advice will always be intrinsically linked to fiscal advice, and that will vary with jurisdiction. Where I live we have no 401k or medical debt, but we have other debt and investment instruments with preferential tax treatment.

        The main line of the flow chart is sound.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        Hey… hey there, I’d let you know that there are 340M Americans and 8.2B people in the World so… that’s like 4% OK… it’s… definitely “most people” because we are number 1 OK! USA, USA… /s

  • hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    100% anything you can do is great.

    My girlfriend and I have each been putting $50/month into an investment account instead of paying for insurance for our dog, that way if she ever needs a big procedure I can pull money from there if I don’t have the savings for it. We’ve been doing this for 3.5 years and have now built up a good amount! I’ll divide the numbers roughly in 2 so you can see what you could be looking at:

    Total $2750.
    Deposits $2200.
    Gains $550.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 天前

      That $550 will cover two vet visits if you’re lucky

      Still better than pet insurance though, which is a scam (I mean all insurance is but especially pet insurance)

      • Kayday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 天前

        I don’t know about that. Both of my cats would be dead if not for pet insurance. One needed a $10k surgery this summer that I was able to afford because of my pet insurance. The other had $4k of surgeries the year before. Both instances my insurance covered 70%. Neither of my cats are much more than 5 years old, just bad luck with their health.

        • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 天前

          Right that’s about all they cover, the freak stuff that costs thousands. But for routine visits, vaccinations, and even small conditions that aren’t life threatening, they’re useless.

          • Kayday@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 天前

            Correct, but thankfully that won’t be a surprise since it is evident when you are enrolling. It’s up to each pet owner to decide if that’s worth it.

            In our case, a few hundred dollars per year to make ER visits financially bearable is a good value.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        Pet insurance is a good thing for people with a large number of animals - particularly rescue animal boarding.

        For most people though, no.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 天前

    Specifically if for retirement, time is your best friend. Anything you can put aside will be multiplied down the years and be much more when you need it most

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 天前

    Absolutely 100% yes yes yes.

    Compounding is your friend. You can play with the values all you want, but this calculator showed me that if you deposited $50/month at 5%/year compounded annually, you’d end up making >$1800 in profit over ten years. Realistically, you should be able to get a better rate and shorter compounding periods once you’ve passed the threshold amount for a mutual fund or GIC.

    And that’s assuming you never increase your deposits.

    Realistically, whenever you get a raise you should assign some of it to increasing your monthly payments. Your goal should be to increase your payments faster than inflation. Get a $2/hr raise? That’ll probably add $250/month to your paycheque after taxes. You should be able to squirrel away $25/month from that at least.

    Here’s a great piece of advice from The Wealthy Barber (Canadian financial dude): Pay yourself first. See if you can get your investment amount taken directly off your pay, and then you’ll never see it, thus be tempted to spend it.

    His other advice is to set a goal of 10% of your income to invest for retirement. Seems like a lot, but it’s doable for most people who are talking about investing anything, like you.

    Remember: The biggest factor in how much you make from investments over time is how early you invest. Invest now. Invest regularly.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 天前

    It’s worth saving - investing (I assume you mean in the stock market/index/mutual fund) probably wouldn’t yield very significant growth but it is worth saving what you can.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 天前

      Investing accidently helped me save. If I have money in an account, and I need to use it, I will, but by buying stocks and bitcoin, I don’t have that money, I have things that will increase in value that I can sell for money. And there have been a few desperate times that I had to do that, but my brain is far more unlikely to take a hypothetical future loss, than spend all my money today.

        • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 天前

          Truth. Lots of money to be made in crypto but it’s basically gambling outside of eth and BTC. I make decent returns playing with memecoins but you have to watch it for awhile and know when to sell/buy etc… for example, now it’s a good time to throw money into Shiba Inu coin. It’s down a lot, which is normal, but it’ll go back to higher numbers soon, as it always does. Once you get a feel for what a normal low and high are you can just set auto buy/sell at those points and make decent profits.

          Of course, when it comes to crypto, Bitcoin and eth are more like commodities and are generally safe. Shit coins are high risk but but $50 in a shit coin could be $150 overnight if you know what to look for.

          Edit - don’t fuck with big money in crypto unless you’re willing to lose it, but $10 here and there can be fun and often profitable.

            • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 天前

              Awesome. I’ll take the the standard 10% unless/until, you lose your ass. Then I’ll just pretend I don’t know you.

        • mesamune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 天前

          I remember back s decade ago and using it to buy a coffee. It was slow back then. Can’t think of the time it takes now.

    • benni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 天前

      Why would the absolute amount of money matter for investing vs. saving cash? Assuming he finds a broker for which absolute transaction fees are negligible, the only important factors should be time window and risk tolerance, both of which are independent of the absolute saving rate.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 天前

    It’s honestly probably better putting that amount of money into trying to get a better job over that time period via education, or taking time off to apply for new positions, or something similar.

    $6000 total investment over 10 years even with decent interest on top would be made up in less than 2 years with a $5k raise.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 天前

    Yes. If you can afford it, dumping that money into an ETF like VT, VTI, or VOO every month for the next 10 years is very likely to result in you turning a profit. Start with a Roth IRA and don’t bother with a standard brokerage account until you’re able to max out the contribution limit. If you want to do anything more complicated than buy big low cost ETFs study up first and go slow.

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 天前

    Yes. I started with 50/month using Autopilot to get in on the Pelosi investment portfolio. I am up 18% for the year.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 天前

    Do you have emergency money?

    First start emergency fund, then take care of debt. Then build a savings for emergency fund, then invest.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 天前

      For anyone with stable income, only debt who’s interest rate is at or above the potential interest you would earn investments should be paid down first. Any debt at a rate lower than you stand to earn, should be paid over time. Any debt lower than the rate of inflation should be paid as slow as the terms allow without penalty.

      So my order of priority is: high interest debt>emergency fund>tax deferred investing>ira and investing>low interest debt>even more cash holding>debt below inflation.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        Not everyone has stable income. And for them, attacking debt isn’t always possible, especially after they go to get their car inspected and have a $1000 bill to settle in order to get to work for their unstable income. That’s starting your emergency fund goes first.

        You need your initial emergency fund to reasonably cover “a bump in the road”. You then get stable, attack debt, and build emergency fund to be 3-6months expenditures, in case of a serious emergency.

        Only then do we begin gambling in the investment markets.

        • MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 天前

          High interest debt is an emergency. Anything in the emergency category gets paid first. High interest debt is a trap, you can’t hope to meet any other goal in life if you don’t take care of that first.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 天前

    Yes, saving is like a muscle you need to do it to get better with it. It’s far easier to turn 50/months into 200/month as your income grows, than starting at 200/month.

    • obstbert@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 天前

      Yeah, finding some free ETF saving plan and investing 50 a month will give you some experience in investing. You can learn about, what’s an ETF, what’s diversification and how you react personally to seeing the number go up and down.

      One has to start somewhere.