• Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Businesses still operating on factory work playbooks and just cramming in creatives like a monkey wrench.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    See what I do is juuuuuuust, not give a fuck. I do things my way, and when the bosses say “No, you gotta do it THIS way” I just say “OOOOOOOOH, ok. I’ll do that”.

    As if it’s the first time they’ve ever told me. Then I just act like I’m learning it for the first time, and then…this is the key…I still do it my way.

    And then the bosses say “No no no, remember? We gotta do it THIS way!”

    And I say “OOOOOOOOH, ok. I’ll do that.”

    And then…key moment…I still don’t give a shit, and still do my way.

    And then the bosses say “Hey, remember, we said we were doing it this way?”

    And I say “Yeah, I was doing that,but then I remembered we also do it this other faster way, and then I did that instead.”

    “Well, we don’t do that anymore. We do THIS! THIS! THIS is the way we do it. THIS!!!”

    “OOOOOOOOOOH, ok. I’ll do that.”

    And then…I do it my way.

    And the boss above the boss doesn’t give a shit because it doesn’t matter either way. So the only one losing their shit is middle management.

    See the key here is to drive them slowly insane, until they get so angry, and so full of hate that they turn to drinking. Which inevitably gets them to become an alcoholic at work, as that’s the source of their stress. Which in turn gets them fired for being drunk on the job.

    That’s when you go out and find a handsome muscular man with a big penis. And you pay him to seduce this guys wife. Multiple times. Eventually he gets addicted to sleeping with her, and you stop paying him. It’ll be easy since her husband is now an unemployed alcoholic.

    So now you’ve been promoted at work, because there’s been a recent role to fill, everyone around you knows you’re not the one to fuck with, and now management above you is saying “Hey, we need to do things THIS way now.”

    “OOOOOOOOOH, ok. I’ll do that.”

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I directed an engineer to check something done in the field by a contractor to see if it was ok. Because it was an edge case not typically done, I said they had to do the check by hand as it would be easier.

      They “knew better” and used a computer program instead.

      The beam that was bending in the computer program was bending in a different direction than what the field issue was. All of their work was worthless.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah yes, a plan with literally no drawbacks. Not even if the boss is as crafty as you are, no sir, there’s no way they’ll find some equally devious way to oust you before this plan comes to fruition for not following their directives, nuh-uh.

      Of course, you could always take more direct action, but for legal reasons, that’s not a suggestion, and I recommend you don’t. Find another job. (Or lose your mind and quit without a plan. Also not recommended.)

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Username doesn’t check out, I think you’ve got a tried-and-tested plan here

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Instructions unclear, now an alcoholic with dick stuck in middle manager.

      I’m sympathetic to instructions like “you need to do it this way BECAUSE perfectly valid reason”. Maybe that pointless paperwork is needed for some compliance documents I’m not aware of; maybe what seems like pointless busywork in preparation is actually essential for one of our biggest customers.

      Alas, at my work, it’s quite often BECAUSE someone tangentially related to the project likes a certain output, and we can never go and speak to them to confirm, nor ask if maybe there’s something else we could get them that could be even better.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        At one of my jobs there would be like Important Requirements because someone said something to someone, but if you actually skipped the layers and just asked “is it important this be like this?” they usually didn’t care.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the managerial caste decides things need to be done a certain way who am I, a lowly peon to say otherwise. When the inevitable fuckup occurs, I can shuffle my feet any say “aww shucks, mr. Bossman, I was only doing thing what you told me to do”. I am paid to work, not to think.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    my favorite corporate logic: “let’s do it this extreme way,” then “it backfired, let’s do it the opposite extreme”… when the answer was always in the middle

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I hate it. People have no discipline/paitence, so if something didn’t work out, corporations want to turn everything upside down, instead drilling down and fixing a few small boring issues

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is my work insisting on using people’s roles for their email addresses “so the accounts can be reused when they quit.” Thats, not how any of this works.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do… do they think email accounts are a rare resource? Of all the things to be concerned about, they’re worried about conserving something so intangible, cheap, and abundant?

      Not sure how that’s supposed to help Line Go Up, but okay.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It makes sense for some outside facing roles. For instance, you may want all vendor billing going to billing@company.com rather than an individual.

        I wouldn’t do it for the whole company, but it could have some uses.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      You might want to look into letting them reuse yours, that place sounds painful.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think I see the logic that you might want to give say customers for product X the email techsupport@productx.com to contact, but that should map to your actual email addresses, not replace them!

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah this is the way. Most companies will have aliases for departments that mass send into a managed inbox or if its one person they have an actual email and then their role is an alias that redirects to their email.

        position changes are as easy as just moving the alias to the new person in the position, this let’s your externals be able to use the same email without having to keep the same email account for everything.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s why you should always request instructions in writing, and always document your objections in a polite but clear way.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Often the stupid shit we see at work is legitimate for reasons above our pay grade, don’t need to know. A manager that will openly and honestly explain those things is a treasure.

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Indeed, but sometimes those reasons are legitimately stupid.

      Case in point, any call center that wants to optimize handle time. The reason they pick it is because it’s a very easy and straightforward metric to improve.

      You just hang up on people. You can make the number go down super easily. Tell them to call back, so they spend two or even three times as long cycling through a new agent each time. Then it’s 3 short 5 to 10 minute calls + time on hold which looks better than one 20 minute call.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are drive thru restaurants still doing basically the same thing by telling people to pull forward to a parking lot stall, to make it look like their time to complete an order is faster than it actually is?

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve only seen that happen when one particular order is waiting on something. It’s a good move because it gets that person out of line so other orders can be filled while they wait instead of holding up the whole line. If they did that to every order they’d just be wasting time making an employee run out to the parking lot every single order and trust me they don’t want to do that.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I only get told to pull forward when there’s a queue, and they want to get the person behind me to the window.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      don’t need to know.

      It is fine enough to ask. You may not get the full answer, but you should get enough direction to know the basics of why or how important the request is.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sometimes it’s for legal reasons. Sometimes it’s for big picture reasons you aren’t privy to. Sometimes it’s because some dumbass middle manager thinks they’re a genius. And sometimes it’s because some dumbass middle manager didn’t have a team member say “Hey what about this instead.”

      Having fumbled my way into a management position of sorts, I’ve seen all of these. Sometimes I get to say “oh yeah, that works way better, do that instead.” Others, “it sucks but it has to be this way because (big picture stuff)”, and of course “yeah it’s fucking retarded but the powers that be have decreed it, do what you can and enjoy the shit show.”

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “HANA needs it for analytics purposes, so the actual purpose of your job isn’t to sell things or keep customers happy, but to gather metrics.”

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I just had a conversation like this about 10 minutes ago at work. And by that I mean the mutant work logic showed up and well… Now I’m putting together a project team.