• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    1 month ago

    Some subreddits, like r/Watchexchange, where Redditors “buy, sell or trade watches,” according to the subreddit’s description, are centered on transactions. Huffman said the fact that users are already “transacting on Reddit kind of opens the door” for such monetization.

    “Hey! How dare you exchange things with each other without giving us a cut!”

    • Whole lot of “Reddit, what are you going to do about the scammers now that we’re paying you?” posts are coming. The answer is nothing. They’ll do nothing.

      Actually, they’ll write their lack of culpability more explicitly into the ToS, and then do nothing.

      • finder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Actually, they’ll write their lack of culpability more explicitly into the ToS, and then do nothing.

        Ugh, aCtUaLly the almighty Reddit Admins and janitors Moderators will act decisively to ban anyone who dares use the report button.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m wondering how they would charge people. Who would pay for a subreddit they’ve never been to? Could a non-paying user view the subreddit but be unable to post/comment?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 month ago

        Could a non-paying user view the subreddit but be unable to post/comment?

        Doubtful. If I remember the statistic correctly, 95% of social media users are lurkers. Greedy Little Pigboy wouldn’t pass up the opportunity to milk the remaining 19/20 users.

      • Obelix@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Let’s be honest - this will kill many subreddits. Of course some mods will start a paid subreddit next to an existing one and try to bring their users to subscribe. So expect those subs to become like those YouTubers who are constantly trying to push you to their Patreon.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          or they allowed subs, but with immense amount of ads: require to watch video, or watch this ad for a certain of time to use it for free. just basing it off how aggressively youtube, facebook does it.

      • Yppm@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Could easily see certain subreddits being like OF or Patreon. Pay for access to content. Pretty tried and true business model and it will probably work well enough to keep it around.

        Even YouTube has “memberships” to channels now where you get bonus content and stuff.

        The people that are interested will pay and those that aren’t won’t.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        could be something like a private sub, where only approved members can enter.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      thats why they have been aggressively going after OF subs/bots this month, they arnt getting a slice from the profit they are earning externally. from another forum,(where people flee after getting banned this way) alot of them lost tons of accts recently. yup one of my accts was temp ban for using the report button, how many is too much? it depends on the mod and the sub, if they dont like that you are reporting are reporting a person that should be reported, or the comment, you get banned for report abuse. these bans seems much severe than a subreddit ban.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes let’s put a site that consists pretty much entirely of user-created content behind a paywall, what could possibly go wrong?

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’ll be the porn they charge for.

    They know only wankers will give them money.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s funny about that is Reddit is mostly just an advertising front for onlyfans at this point

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean yeah, and that’s the piece of the pie they want. It will start with letting content creators charge and probably end by some ban or disincentive on direct only fans links.

    • FunCube@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      First they came for the porn subreddits, but I didn’t say anything because I was not a porn subreddit.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, that’s the death of the free* forum. Went from BBS to newsgroups to phpBB to Reddit, each soft-killing its predecessor. But like WalMart killing Main Street, Reddit is going to kill the free forum.

    Thank goodness for Lemmy and other free* social network software.

    *free with the asterisk because we know it’s not free, we are enjoying the service that others volunteer to pay for.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Lemmy will need ads to support individual servers, eventually, when they’re not attached to another org (like a server CNN would run for just outgoing news dissemination). The rest of them, with bills and needing to eat, may need to go to ads.

      I support proper ads that do not get priority placement and aren’t in-your-face.

      I support prioritization of profile migration so we can vote with our feet if a particular server’s ad volume and content offends our sensibilities.

      But I’m just saying I fully expect some ads are gonna happen, and I hope we can prevent full enshittification when that happens.

      • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, it will never have ads. If the devs put ads in, it will get forked. If server admins put in ads, they will be defederated. That’s nonnegotiable if you want a free (as in libre) fediverse.

        Mastodon is way bigger than Lemmy and it doesn’t need ads. Donations and subscriptions (for severs that choose that path) are enough.

        • Yppm@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t want it to have ads either but bandwidth is not free and someone somewhere is paying for it.

          Is the donations don’t cover the bills there are few options.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            I really enjoyed the Reddit gold model. I paid them $30/year for many years because I got so much out of the site that I felt they deserved it. Their monetization was pretty innocuous.

            Then the enshittification happened.

          • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            Is the donations don’t cover the bills there are few options.

            They usually do. When we opened for donations, we pretty much hit our goals within days and our donations currently exceed our expenses without having to do donation drives. @Blaze@feddit.org had a thread where Lemmy Admins discussed their costs and a lot are already fully funded.

          • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s not free, but it’s pretty cheap. When you don’t have to have massive marketing departments, huge management bonuses, expensive office space, crappy proprietary software, and massively scaled highly available platforms it costs a lot less to run a social media platform. Donations can often cover it all.

            If one server gets too big, they can just cap registrations and people move to a different server.

            • Yppm@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Good point. Way less staff to keep this service running as long as growth is not a priority like it is with most companies.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            And there’s a scaling problem, right? Like, the bigger the federation is, the more traffic each instance gets.

            Maybe large institutions (universities, some governments, some companies, and so on) can each host their own instance. It would be a drop in their existing hosting costs.

  • FackCurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope all the lemmy instances are ready for a surge of users. Let’s encourage redditors to join Lemmy and learn the kinks and quirks by trial and error. Let’s be kind to the newcomers.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit executives also discussed how they might introduce more ads into the social media platform.

    Oh how exciting!

    • FackCurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Welcome! Hope you like it here. I’m happy to see people are jumping ship despite the “it’s too complex to switch to Lemmy” false narrative.

        • FackCurs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I personally don’t really like that analogy. With email, you can send and email to anyone who has an email address. You can only see emails you have received after creating your email account. It’s simple and clear. With the fediverse, for past posts, you can see some: only if it was posted on your instance or if someone on your instance was following them when it was originally posted or has interacted with it since, meaning there is some technicality that prevents you from seeing everything you think you should be able to see.

          In terms of account creation, I agree. Just pick a provider (instance), if you don’t like it you can create a new account somewhere else later.

    • Nebula_Express_93462@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same, fresh refugee here. I’ve tried mastodon before and I didn’t feel good with Fediverse, but only because I never really used Twitter. Surprisingly I only discover Reddit few weeks ago (to properly spend some time there… where was I all these years lol) I’m starting to like this fediverse though 😁

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Honestly, same. Mastodon is fine if you like the Twitter format, but I never did. Lemmy works for me, largely cuz Reddit also worked for me, until the API debacle.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    service that owes its popularity largely to its low barrier to entry signals higher barriers to entry

    cool! please do.