What’s the context?

Humane’s Ai Pin and other AI wearables are difficult to recycle, threatening to worsen the world’s global e-waste problem.

  • Quicky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This article is a bit of a mess. What the fuck does AI have to do with the amount of glue used in a device?

    And why focus on a limited run from a failed product rather than the literal millions of successful wearable products like airpods that are equally hard to recycle?

    Also

    Meanwhile, the use of the technology is only expected to grow.

    Very insightful

    • Quicky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Oh and not to question the professor’s expertise but you can’t blame the consumers for this one. Literally NOBODY asked for one of these pins.

      “These products are designed based on the consumers’ desires and affordability,” said Berrin Tansel, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Florida International University.

      Making them easier to recycle would require the cost of the material recovery process to be fronted by the manufacturer, making them more expensive, Tansel told Context.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            36 minutes ago

            If only we had a way to collect money from companies as they operate. Damn.

            Edit: I know you said in this case, but taxing companies for this makes sense and needs to be said

    • Mîm@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And why focus on a limited run from a failed product rather than the literal millions of successful wearable products like airpods that are equally hard to recycle?

      Because there are a lot of people with an hateboner for everything with ‘AI’ mentioned with it and it brings clicks.

  • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It feels a bit like the author used AI as a buzzword to get people to click on an article about electronics recycling.

    e-waste is a big issue affecting everyone and AI has lots of known issues. Mashing both of those things together doesn’t fix anything.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I mean, this sucks, but Apple’s Airpods are far more egregious, far more numerous (something like 550 million+ versus 10,000+ AI pins), and have spawned an army of copycats all whom cannot be repaired and are just ewaste waiting to happen.

    It’s really that the entire fucking industry just doesn’t god damned care and I can’t even find places that reliably take electronic waste like desktops and laptops, let alone this fucking horseshit. USA produces massive amounts of ewaste and basically is like “fuck it” on creating a recycling industry around it.

    This problems goes so far beyond these dinky AI pins.

    Futurama was making jokes about the horrors of ewaste in its first return run in 2013, it’s 2025 and it’s only gotten worse.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      I think the company behind Fairphone makes wireless earbuds as well with replaceable batteries. They are priced in the mid range segment but sadly not available worldwide.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        It’s irrelevant, people are going to replace them every other year regardless to get the latest and greatest

      • balssh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        While airpods are dogwater in terms of recycling, I have a 2nd hand pair or them and 2 years later they still work like in the beggining.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        At least they can be used for 2 years. What about single use vapes? Those things have a lithium battery but people throw them everywhere, instead of recycling them.

  • Orangedrops@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    When I was a kid, I remember my parents frequently taking electronics for repair. Our old VHS and Television had been repaired 7 times over and lasted years.

    It really does grip me that every tech device made these days which relies on a battery is near impossible to self service. For years I built PC’s for people so not unfamiliar with components but I can’t change a battery on Samsung / iPhone or change the battery in my £300 Sony Bluetooth ear buds.

    The problem is everywhere not just tech as such. Recently my kettle element gave up the ghost. No problem I thought, I can pick up an element for a few quid and change it.

    Kitchen Aid however have decided to internally solder their elements so once that’s gone, throw it. £250 kettle with literally not a blemish on it, in the bin because a component that costs all of about 50p to manufacture is no longer replaceable.

    I find it so egregious and wasteful…… I do look as far as possible at repairability before buying anything these days but alas, it’s a bloody uphill struggle and as other have said, with so much crap also being manufactured we’re in a pretty sad state which is only going to get worse :(

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Came here to say this, the total number produced could probably easily fit in a U-Haul moving box.