Researchers have come up with two new urinal designs to prevent the spillage of “ill-aimed pee.”

      • Korrok@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah, but there’s plenty of women who don’t want to touch the toilet seat so they hover over it and get it dirty as a result.

        • Shou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          Ironic isn’t it? It would have been fine if everyon just sat down. Just whipe the seat with a cleaning tissue first if you don’t trust it.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 days ago

        The researchers suggest that if Nautilus was to replace the 56 million urinals across the U.S., around 1 million liters of urine would be prevented from being splashed onto the floor every day. Assuming that the volume of water needed to clean up spilled urine is about 10 times that of the volume of urine, about 10 million liters (2,199,692 gallons) of fresh water could be saved every day, the scientists said.

        The widespread adoption of these urinal designs “would result in considerable conservation of human resources, cost, cleaning chemicals, and water usage, rendering large-scale impacts on modern society by improving sustainability, hygiene, and accessibility,” the researchers wrote.

        They should drop everything and do this first thing.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Not sure if youre sarcastic or not (I was), but there has actually been research if the nutrients in urine can be used as fertiliser and I believe the result was positive.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 days ago

    It’s because people stand too far back from the urinal, and then shake it like they are trying to kill it. Get in there, and then finish with a gentle squeeze or two and you won’t splatter everywhere.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 days ago

    Story time.

    It honestly feels like about 264,000 gallons of that were spilled at a placed I used to work. I still have no idea who the culprit(s) was.

    No kidding, the problem was so bad that building management stepped in and… added chamomile scented floor mats beneath the urinals to catch and deodorize the… ugh (gross)… drippings. It was such a strong smell that it wafted out into the hallway with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. This prompted some of the women in the office to remark at how unfair it was that the men’s room was obviously getting all this extra attention. I almost can’t describe the mixture of disappointment and disgust on their faces once I explained why this was happening.

    I also once had to explain to my wife that the above situation, along with the smell of urinal cakes and most gas-station-restroom deodorizers, are the reason why chamomile tea is a hard pass for me.

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 days ago

    Anyone, whether it’s man or woman, who pisses or shits or whatever all over a toilet (i.e. not inside) has quite likely never cleaned a fucking toilet in their life.

    Source: Have cleaned toilets, not just my own, before - it has changed me.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I mean the dick is sometimes arbitrary, even when you make sure as not to have any foreskin in the way of your urethra.

      Especially after fucking.

      But if that happens to me, I’m usually courteous enough to take a hit of paper and at least dab most of it away. But if it’s a rank toilet with already piss waving on the floor, no thanks. Sorry. Can’t help, the amount of toilet paper in one cubicle isn’t enough. And usually the places with that level of hygiene don’t necessarily have even a toilet seat, let alone several rolls of paper.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Do a small test with a single user, take the amount of spillage then times it by the pissing population and average numbers of wees a day.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 days ago

    I do like the Nautilus and wish the designed for everyone philosophy was the predominant one. Especially you get one lower level one put in when they could all be functional for everyone.

    “The researchers’ Cornucopia and Nautilus designs both achieved a significant reduction in urine splashing, with the Cornucopia performing best. However, the Nautilus was considered the most ideal design due to its height, which would allow shorter people — including children or those in wheelchairs — to more easily use it. Its larger gape would also be easier to clean, and would be more accepting of poor aim, and therefore would also be appropriate for use on boats or airplanes.”

  • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 days ago

    I love the mental image of a government employee having the job of spilling barrels of piss into bathrooms around the nation

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I seriously doubt this number, as it’s roughly 7ml for every male in America. I recall from chemistry classes that there are about 10 drops of water in a ml, so that’s 70 full-size drops - or a lot more small droplets - hitting the floor during a day of peeing a few times. A lot of it would land on the front of our pants, so it would be super common for guys to have pee liberally splattered all over our pants. That just doesn’t happen, unless maybe you did something weird like pee straight at a tile wall. The only way this could be true is if there are a significant number of guys who deliberately pee on the floor. Anybody wanna fess up?

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s more like 6ml (264172/166100000 gallons), and considering the average man produces between 800 and 2000ml per day, that’s like a 0.5% spill rate.

      Also it says nothing about the rate being evenly distributed over the days, it could be that the average guy spills a fraction of a liter in one slip up every couple weeks, not 6ml every single day. Plus the young and elderly likely throw off those averages.

      Lastly, your assumption that most drops go on the pants ignores the whole point of the new design this article is about: the splashback. They claim most of the urine that misses a urinal splashes out in microdroplets.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Seems like a complete lie. Men might lose a few drops due to the shape of the bowl tops. It’s certainly not worth anyone tearing out urinals in the hope some hypothetical piss splashage goes down.

    And personally a better goal for urinal design is water reduction. i.e. urinals that use no water, or the bare minimum to flush the piss through.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      It’s a little more than 1/2 a teaspoon, per person. Not exactly hard to believe.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Men aren’t dumping half a teaspoon of piss on the floor. Adults are capable of aiming and pissing and the only waste might be where piss strikes a surface and droplets escape the bowl - assuming the bowl was terrible and everyone in the nation pissed at the exact angle to cause droplets to achieve escape velocity. It’s an absurd generalisation and also an absurd problem in search of a solution.

    • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      a better goal for urinal design is water reduction. i.e. urinals that use no water

      Don’t get me started on those “zero water” urinals. They start to stink and accumulate all kinds of nasty in a matter of weeks. There’s a reason we flush all of that stuff down the toilet and into the sewers.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        They have them in all the McDonald’s around here and I’ve never noticed any difference in smell. There is a sticker near the urinal saying they save tens of thousands of litres of drinking water per year which I can believe. I think the system has some kind of valve and siphon to prevent smells.