• ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What happened with her? She seemed okay when she was running a few elections ago and had some support, but then went a bit off and I stopped following her.

  • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you like the ideas of the Green Party, vote for them at the local level. The fact that they don’t seem to want to govern at the local level is enough for me to ignore them as an option.

    • osarusan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This needs to be said more than anything else.

      Politics NEVER changes from the top down. You don’t elect some absolute newcomer who circumvents all the normal paths and then completely revolutionizes the country. (At least not in a stable, functioning society.) Politics in the US happens from the ground up. Not top down.

      If any third party was serious about changing society, they would start at the local level. Then, after proving that they can enact meaningful change and bridge the divide between the huge political span that Americans hold, they would sweep their state elections and federal elections.

      All of these pie-in-the-sky parties who think that they will win the presidency and then somehow enact society-changing legislation (_the president doesn’t make laws!!!_) are either fools or charlatans.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      vote for them at the local level.

      They only run in a handful of local races. I’ve lived in both a red state and a blue state- Indiana and California- in multiple districts and I have never once seen a green party candidate on the local level.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is literally my point. Ignore them until they seem to want governance as opposed to only seeing them in national headlines tilting at windmills. It’s worthless.

        If you like Stein’s platform, voting for Stein will decrease the likelihood of you ever seeing such a policy implemented. If, say, a state rep. runs on a Green platform, they would likely get my vote.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cool. I really hate the English use of “you” when “one” is really the word one wants. But when one uses “one” as opposed to “you”, one sounds crazy.

            I honestly think a lot of online defensiveness arises from this construction.

            I’m saying, it sounds like I’m saying “you need to do blah cuz you’re wrong about blah”, when I would prefer it to be read as reiterating my earlier point of “if one wants to see Green policies enacted, one would do well to ignore Jill Stein.”

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gayle McLaughlin used to be the Green Party’s best example of what they could do at the local level, until she left in 2016 to vote for Bernie Sanders. I’m fairly certain she is the outlier.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right. I do believe that many members of the Green Party are good political options. It’s just they as a party don’t rally around them. They only seem to push for the presidency. I don’t see how they can hope to accomplish anything when they seem to shoot for the moon every four years, and only manage to spoil things.

        Until I start seeing good options on the ballots from the Greens, I will just continue to hope the progressives win the dem. primaries for my local seats.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They only seem to push for the presidency

          This is the key indicator and red flag that they are a clown party that isn’t serious about politics. They’re in it for the attention and the money.

    • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can’t run local level candidates without funding. All you do is complain instead of help.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a voter, my friend. I can complain about a party all damn day. If you think that a political party is going get a dime from me before they can even convince me to vote for them, you have strange spending habits.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that I don’t care about local politics. You sending a link that’s relevant to other people’s local politics is completely irrelevant to me. Until the GP option is common on local ballots, not just 5 featured ones, I do not want hear about a presidential run.

            By the way, I do commemorate you on your outreach and activism. You’re getting shit on in this thread, and you’re still politely getting your links out. Good work.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And they can run presidential candidates without funding??? What the heck are you talking about?

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s easier to raise awareness of the campaign, and yes they historically get much more attention and funding.

    • MedicatedMaybe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We certainly do, but you wouldn’t catch me voting for that Russian stooge after everything that went down in 2016.

      • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The federal government doesn’t control elections. You handle that at the state (or county/parish/whatever) level. At least here in Oregon, people can bring measures to the ballot by petition rather than waiting for the legislature to do anything about it, and given two party monopoly, they aren’t going to do anything about it for you.

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Support and donate to a party that does support ranked choice voting and they’ll be able to run state level candidates

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think it’s going to matter what party supports RCV. Once it’s the law of your area, candidates will be running in an RCV election whether they supported it or not.

            • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How will RCV be implemented in states without ballot measures? Have to vote for a party that will implement it.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the Dems then, their voting rights policy has moved towards at the very least making it much easier to switch to a PR system of any kind.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not this shit again. Our country literally might not survive another Donald Trump presidency, which is what you’re helping happen by supporting a 3rd-party candidate when we have a 2-party system.

    1. Keep Trump and his goons from taking power
    2. Vote local. This is where things like ranked-choice voting and reproductive rights are created and have impact
    3. When it’s not “first past the post”, vote for whoever you want, guilt-free! At this point, there’s no such thing as a spoiler candidate…

    It’s called priorities.

    • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe there is any way Biden will be re-elected. If for no other reason when he finally dies of old age who would want kamala running the show.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is as bad a take as people saying there’s no way he can lose re-election. Pro or against, betting POTUS (who has the best healthcare in the world) will die in the next 4 years is the longest of bets. Also, no one votes based on who the successor might be. Lastly, he’s healthier than Trump for fuck’s sake…

        • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude is like 80. Math doesn’t lie and the best doctors in the world can’t stop time. Statistically it’s time to dig a hole. He won’t be re-elected, but if he were there’s no way he’s got another 4 years left kicking dirt.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            the best doctors in the world can’t stop time

            Ok but life expectancy literally directly correlates with the quality of your healthcare

            • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Understood. He’s already 8 years past the average life expectancy of a American man. The writing is on the wall.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, her chance of winning is so high. And won’t tip the results toward the right wing at all And pigs have wings

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something something Russian check is in the mail Jill.

      Totally not running as a spoiler, nahhh. Not good ol Jill Spoiler Stein! She just wants you to Send A Message™ (at an incredibly important time that has lasting repercussions if you actually follow through.)

      Here’s an idea, if you actually gave a shit Jill, why not lead the charge for ranked choice voting!!! Put your damn face all over the media when it’s not an election year so you can actually push for positive change. At least then you’d stand a chance and people could actually vote for you! But no, that’s not the intent. The intent is to syphon votes from Democrats again.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Her last campaign went heavy on ranked choice (as all green party candidates have been) but the green party has to run candidates to retain ballot access and therefore retain members. Campaigns are also a great way to promote issues ignored by major candidates (such as rcv) but the press has not been kind to third parties since ross perot so its not a surprise most people are unfamiliar with green party platforms.

        in 2023 post covid her tepid vaccine skepticism seems like some major baggage (along with 2016s brutal coverage) and I wouldn’t be surprised if she was more picking up jimmy dore style dumbass voters this time around and less acting as a spoiler. Her reputation is so toxic at this point that it does seem like the green party is throwing democrats a bone here.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Green Party will always run a candidate. Just be thankful their candidate is the charmless husk of a moron that is Jill Stein.

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone else mentioned, Jill is a great Green party candidate for Democrats because she sucks. She’s not that young, has Russian baggage, and isn’t the new face that could make the party more popular. The philosopher dude, West, seemed a bit more dangerous, but Stein being their nominee drills in the fact that there are no viable 3rd parties. The real strategy has been that of the DSA, where they promote their own candidates within the two party system. It’s both realistic, and far more effective than throwing your vote away.

    The only people who will vote for a known spoiler like Jill Stein are to far gone to have really been potential Biden voters.