Dr. John Wust does not come off as a labor agitator. A longtime obstetrician-gynecologist from Louisiana with a penchant for bow ties, Dr. Wust spent the first 15 years of his career as a partner in a small business — that is, running his own practice with colleagues.

Long after he took a position at Allina Health, a large nonprofit health care system based in Minnesota, in 2009, he did not see himself as the kind of employee who might benefit from collective bargaining.

But that changed in the months leading up to March, when his group of more than 100 doctors at an Allina hospital near Minneapolis voted to unionize. Dr. Wust, who has spoken with colleagues about the potential benefits of a union, said doctors were at a loss on how to ease their unsustainable workload because they had less input at the hospital than ever before.

“The way the system is going, I didn’t see any other solution legally available to us,” Dr. Wust said.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely. Unionize. Doctors should unionize. Accountants should unionize. Graphic designers should unionize. Everyone should unionize except the executives that have to bargain with the unions.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        “It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’d been fooled.”

        Crazy how accurate Mark Twain was about the United States even way back then.

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        At my job years ago they had a required training that was watching a video that was essentially anti union propaganda.

        They had two managers discussing the need for a new supervisor position opening up, and discussing two qualified candidates. Then a third guy (poorly dressed and obnoxious personality) comes in and says they have to promote this other guy, due to union rules. The managers exclaim that guy barely ever comes to work and when he does has very poor performance, but Obnoxious Union Guy insists their hands are tied and they must promote him.

        End Scene.

        Now, good employee forced to watch this video, can’t you see how unions are bad?? And YOU have to pay a fee to essentially destroy the company so we go under and you have to get a new job! Be a good little employee and keep working hard and forget the word Union exists.

      • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How does that work for smaller businesses? Legit asking.

        I’m pro-union, but with a whopping…7 employees on good day, I’m struggling to see how bringing in a union would help without having massive overhead cost due to the lack of quantity being paid in.

        My company already pays as much as it can back to the employees (I am the lowest paid employee, as the owner, at what amounts to a $1 salary), we pay as much as we can afford towards health benefits, we reimburse a portion of home internet and cell, and we do a lot that results in free meals and other gifts for employees.

        That said, I wouldn’t be opposed to a union if it improved morale, but I am just struggling to understand where they would add the best value for the cost. I don’t want my employees to suffer, but frankly if union dues cost like…I don’t know, $3500/mo, I’d much rather just split that money across the employees to pocket on their own.

        edit: To the people down voting, I would legitimately love to hear why. And am looking for feedback on how you think I should fix the situation.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With a smaller business yeah you are right as long as the business is paying what it can then no a union is probably not a good idea. As long as the owners are willing to up the pay as far as they reasonably can then the union dues just take from the employee. But I was talking about in general unions are good.

          • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every penny goes to the employees, I pay myself $1 and nothing more, no distributions, no bonuses, no private stock, nothing. During peak COVID I had to pay wages and benefits out of pocket since we were closed.

            At the end of the day I just do the bookkeeping and permits/license paperwork and crap. I’m not doing any of the actual work. So I shouldn’t really be paid.

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, the executives should probably also unionise, it will help normalise negotiations and spread best practices that lead to a better work environment for all.

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Would be kind of interesting to see what kind of negotiations would arise from having labor, management, and executives all represented by unions!

         

        edited to add missing word

        • Dienervent@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If executive unions could enforced a max amount of hours worked for executives and other similar quality of life requirements. Maybe there would be fewer sociopaths and more humans in executive positions.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Executives are already part of a union. Boards approve the executive hiring of a company, but those boards are made up of executives from other companies. And those companies have boards that include executives from other companies. Hiring and firing of executives are handled by a collective of executives across many companies. It’s a union that protects itself.

        • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Correct, but they would often benefit from having collective bargaining against the board of directors or other owners.

          And organising themselves as a union would also show them that unions aren’t evil and shift focus from exploitation to cooperation. Besides, many unions would have much use of being able to speak for the whole industry in matters of legislation, either as lobby or expert.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if that will achieve what you want it to. Remember, the AMPTP is a union and it was able to get concessions from the WGA and SAG-AFTRA which are not good for the workers.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Warms my heart to see everyone from across different industries unionizing.

    Remember, unions and strikes work, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

  • Aesculapius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Physician here.
    Medicine is one of the few professions in which capital is tied to labor (at least of the licensed independent clinicians). Hospitals, clinics, etc., can’t run any test, provide any service, perform any surgery, without a physician (or other licenses clinicians) order.

    Health systems rely on their physicians to drive clinical practice. Physicians are the experts after all. It’s a mutually beneficial relationship, but at its core, it is a partnership. This partnership certainly has it’s ups and downs. But this is what happens when the health system forgets that it is a partnership.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buddy, that’s every job where someone earns a paycheck.

      If someone pays you a paycheck, you are labor. If you depend on that paycheck, they are capital, you are the proletariat.

      We’ve been in the midst of a capital strike for 4 decades now, rebranded as neoliberalism, where capital only reinvests capital if it absolutely must, and then just the minimum. Every personal passion, every altruistic drive, or careers that give a sense of meaning will that same meaning held hostage and weaponized to silent dissent.

      Complacency is complicity. The rallying cries have been handed down thru all of history

      As long as one free man is jailed … First they came for …

      Society, writ large, is a partnership. Highly specialized fields of study only exist because the cost to bring them in existence can be spread out amongst the bottom of the pyramid. If you’re worked hard, learned hard and lucky enough you might be able to be at the top of it.

      But you’re just a part of the machine, not the driver or designer of it. The proper attitude at heights is gratitude and humility, being honored to have the chance to follow your passions, because how many below you, for whatever reason, had theirs compromised, stolen or confiscated. The brain outside the body isn’t even worth its caloric density.

      I’m proud you’re fighting back and I’ll stand in a protest line with you - even if that means state violence, and it often does. The police are mercenaries for the wealthy, whom you’re at odds with, that means the police are not your allies here (some random cool sheriff notwithstanding).

      We are all people here. We all have value independent of what capitalism rewards. No one is inherently better than anyone else. We are all just trying to live and be decent people. Don’t forget that.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think their point was that in many fields, if people strike then the employer can somewhat easily find scabs to do the work in place of those striking, because everyone needs money to live. But in the medical field, along with a couple others, strikes can be even more effective because the employers legally can’t fill roles with just anyone who will do the work- they need someone with a MASSIVE amount of education and certification, which gives doctors even more bargaining power that they can be leveraging if they work together

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks! I like lemmy! It reminds me of old reddit. Like 2010 reddit. Done right it feels like individual forums all within the same building. Done wrong, well, feels like reddit now. Or Facebook. Saccharine and sterile, emotionless money grab. As inviting as a room with drop ceilings and flickering fluorescent lighting, all the intuitive ambiance of chemotherapy.

          So if that was meant as a knock, I don’t see how.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The police are mercenaries for the wealthy, whom you’re at odds with

        Ah yes everyone knows doctors are poor.

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In comparison to the shareholders who own the hospitals?

          Yes, yes they are, it’s not even close.