• Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t worry, I’m sure google will disable that soon in the same way they disable all the other search syntax that used to make searching a simple and easy task

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Cool, pedant. Addend “on google” to my comment then if you need, since that’s clearly the context we’re talking about here. I’m aware there are other search engines, but context should have made what I was talking about pretty fucking obvious.

          • skulblaka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            (Not OP) Point taken, but in that case the solution should also be obvious. Just use a different one that does provide that. If the product sucks, hit the bricks. DDG and Kagi are looking for market share, they’d love to have you.

            • Vespair@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I do use alternatives, but I mention Google because it’s what’s relevant to the conversation at hand.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    I look forward to Google being forced to down rank any sites with “reddit” in the H1.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve spent a lot of time working in SEO.

        Search results like this can drive people away from Google and toward other resources. Google likes money, and this is why they usually try to combat spammers that are gaming the system.

        It’s a cat and mouse game that has been happening for years. Organic search spammers find a new thing, then Google tweaks the algorithm to downrank what they’re exploiting.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          then Google tweaks the algorithm

          Well you don’t have to read Cory’s newest column to understand that Google hasn’t been doing that, because they don’t have to. They do not care, at least not yet, because they have arguably become too big to care.

          • Jesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            No doubt. That said, they do update the algo to combat this stuff. If you work in SEO you’re likely quite aware of what tricks currently work and no longer work.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 months ago

    As useful as Mozilla/5.0; AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.3

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mine is Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0. Joke is, this is the trimmed version (about:config Xorigin and trimming settings) and some pages already have problems with it. If you strip out the OS part, pages like google.com won’t work anymore. Despite that you shouldn’t parse the UA string…

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Trick is I took out the actually useful parts like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc. And the OS. All the agents these days have AppleWebKit and Mozilla just so old websites that look for it don’t downgrade the experience.

        • 7heo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah, make your user agent absolutely unique. Too much entropy will surely confuse the shit out server side HTTP Header tracking. 😬

            • 7heo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Oh gee, I wasn’t aware there was more to it than the UA. Thanks for opening my eyes.

              Edit: I checked your link, most of the parameters on the test require client side execution. That (client side tracking) is absolutely unrelated to what (server side tracking) I was talking about, and is something you can control (by not allowing JavaScript, for example). Please do not confuse the two. There is literally nothing you can do against server side tracking.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah this isn’t my UA but I’m just saying these parts are what’s considered the supported featureset rather than information about what software the device is running.

            • 7heo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes, I get that point, but I also think that it’s tempting for the privacy-minded novice to think “the less information I provide, the better!”, while in actuality, it is better to provide “more” information: the most common UA, even if it means lying about your featureset. In this case, truly, more is less.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Firefox doesn’t pretend to use AppleWebKit. It’s actually the only one which identifies itself correctly… mostly, at least:

          Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

          While about:support says “Window Protocol: wayland”. But that’s ok websites shouldn’t care anyway.

          It’s other browsers who send things like “like Gecko” to sneak past old browser-detection code.

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I fucking hate seo abusers. I have to use a locally hosted ai for a lot of my “googling” because modern day search results are fucking worthless now.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Stop using “reddit” and use “site:reddit.com”, searchers.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Am I the only one that wants to know more about this Japanese toaster you can fuck?

    Surely I’m not alone here.