White House levy to protect US makers from cheap imports likely to inflame trade tensions

The US president, Joe Biden, has announced a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles as part of a package of measures designed to protect US manufacturers from cheap imports.

In a move that is likely to inflame trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, the White House said it was imposing more stringent curbs on Chinese goods worth $18bn.

Sources said the move followed a four-year review and was a preventive measure designed to stop cheap subsidised Chinese goods flooding the US market and stifling the growth of the American green technology sector.

Despite the risks of retaliation from Beijing, Biden said the increased levies were a proportionate response to China’s overcapacity in the EV sector. Sources said China was producing 30m EVs a year but could sell only 22-23m domestically.

  • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess Americans will never get cheap electric cars. Make no mistake. US automakers aren’t going to use this tariff to buy time to make competitive cheap electric cars. They’re just going to rest on their laurels and continue to sell large overpriced trucks, SUV and their EV counterparts.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s what pisses me off here, I just want something affordable to get from a-b work commute, I’m not spending $80k on an electric suv that I only have because I’m forced into work.

      It’s gonna end up with me buying a moped or small motorcycle to get to work at reasonable cost

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m thinking of getting a smart car for city driving since I often have to haul gear from one borough to another, but REALLY don’t want a traditional car, much less an SUV. They seem so much easier to find parking for

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you’re talking about the smart brand car i wouldn’t, they’ve been discontinued in the US so maintenance on them is going to be difficult and expensive.

          If you’re American that is, assuming you’re a New Yorker based on usage of borough lol

          • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Are there any other cars that small? The only reason I’m considering in the first place is because of its size. I really fucking hate traditional cars otherwise. I also see them all over the city.

            • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not that are sold in the US and import/conversion prices are insane. Unfortunately most of our countrymen love massive vehicles so that’s what is sold here, plus the car companies lobbied to have emissions testing be more lenient for massive vehicles

      • graymess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s gonna end up with me buying a moped or small motorcycle to get to work at reasonable cost

        Actually glad to hear that. That’s one positive outcome from this aggressive nationalist bullshit decision from Biden. Electric cars (even cheaper, smaller ones from China) aren’t an appropriate way to address climate change. Converting car drivers to two wheelers is way more of a positive move and will also have major benefits to traffic and pedestrian safety. Way better than buying a big fucking American electric pickup truck or SUV.

        • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You’re kinda skipping over a few things as well as something the previous comment mentioned.

          1. Weather. I live in a pretty big metro area that has freezing cold winters and sweltering hot summers (with high humidity).
          2. Cargo space is definitely something to think about. There are a lot of families that have to drive to a store for a family’s amount of food for the week
          3. Long distances to get to anything in the suburbs amplifies issues 1 and 2 (including usually no pubic transportation to help)
          4. The previous commenter mentioned they don’t want a giant SUV and just want an affordable electric car.

          All these things are a reason cars are a huge necessity in most of the US. Yes, getting to an area where we can all mostly use 2 wheels would be great, but we should recognize that doing better is a great step forward instead of shooting it down because it’s not perfect.

          I say all this as a person who works from home so I don’t have to worry about a commute, has a small car for necessary trips, and does my best avoid unnecessary driving and makes sure to carpool at every opportunity.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, cause now the cheap competitor they could compare to just got pricier so that means they can also raise prices

      • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I said that US automakers don’t want any Americans buying cheap EVs. They’ll happily sell you an EV just be ready to pay mid-high five to low six figures for it. No way in hell do they want to make 20k EVs.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Adjusted for inflation, they’re even cheaper than the Geo Metro was. 1998 Metro is around $19k in 2024 dollars, while some of these Chinese cars are clocking under $14k.

      However, you should also expect it to function like a car cheaper than a Geo Metro.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Simple way to make this policy make sense. Instead of a tariff on imports make it a huge subsidy on domestic EVs. We can give the military contractors billions, but giving the American people cheap cars is somehow a bad investment? Soon many positive side effects of a direct, non monetary stimulus

    • echutaa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no incentive for US automakers to build cheaper EVs from this. This is just protectionism which is fine when China is subsidizing their production past the point of profitability, but this will still work against making American EVs more affordable.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Didn’t US companies that were making EV raise their prices as soon as the government added or increased buyer incentive rebates?

      The greedy assholes basically pocketed the rebate while the consumer got nothing.

      So IMO these manufacturers will just pocket a significant chunk of the subsidy and pass little of the savings on to the consumer. Already many of them claim financial woes, it’s no stretch for them to soak up the cash and say “but we had to…” and get no punishment because the administration doesn’t want to kill the industry it’s trying to support. I mean, $55bn pay packages have to come from somewhere, right?

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Make the subsidy based on current prices and only EVs that are X price or below qualify. There are solutions, we would just have to, I dunno, craft thoughtful legislation aimed at helping Americans and not companies? Sounds like a lot of work though…

        Or let me put it this way: do you think lawmakers write the laws they sign? Industry groups and lobbyists write the laws, lawmakers tweak them or just sign them.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          This is what France is doing.

          The subsidy for EV is 27% of the price of the car with a maximum of 4000€. (+3000€ for people with low revenues).

          The cost of the car must be under 47000€, the car must weight less than 2400kg and it must have a low environmental impact during its production.

          The goal of this last rule is clearly to indirectly exclude cars produced in China. I think tariffs against a specific country is not possible in the European Union so French lawmakers had to come up with a creative solution to exclude Chinese cars.

          • gibmiser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Makes sense to me. Guess they had to put some thought into it.

            Our laws are as good as we make them. Our legislators don’t wanna put in the work, frankly it seems because they don’t care. All that matters is lobbyists money and that your team wins.

    • Argongas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      AFIK, all the subsides for EVa in the US already require them to be made and produced domestically.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re banning 25 year old kei trucks, they were definitely not gonna allow China to compete.

    God forbid we try to save the planet without making morbillions in shareholder value first.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      As far as I know, the Feds aren’t banning Kei style trucks. But most states are banning them from road use. Since they do not meet highway safety standards. But that’s what makes the cheap - deleting all the safety equipment and being under powered. But you can still get as many as you like. And you are still welcome to drive them off road.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The feds aren’t banning them but there’s a 25% tarrif on importing them because of the chicken tax tarrif.

    • Vytle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Electric cars will not save the planet, they will save the auto industry. Use a bike to get around whenever possible if you actually care.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lol he’s beating Trump to it. It won’t help him at all, but it is funny because it will piss the orange asshole off.

    • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      I predict Trump will make a day-one promise to remove this tariff calling it terrible, just terrible.

      • crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        They excerpted Trump on the PBS Newshour yesterday at one of his latest campaign rallies. Apparently his stance on this is that Biden should have done the EV tarriff four years ago. Now, four years ago today, Donald Trump was President, but let’s not let that get in the way of a good speech, right?

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    When China opens up it’s domestic market to international goods then the rest of the world should consider doing the same. Until then, match every barrier to entry.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Those pickup trucks do look really nice, though. If I ever triple my salary I might consider one.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        At $74k per truck, you could buy 2.5 $30k Priusi

        The Silverado Electric is at least in an affordable ballpark, at $40k for their base model. But what the hell does everyone need a truck for, anyway? I see them in the office parking garage all the time, and I can’t imagine what everyone thinks they’re lifting or towing.

        Meanwhile, the BYD Seagull goes for under $10k, a third the price of a Nissan Leaf.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I buy lumber every couple of weekends. Sometimes used furniture. Can’t do that in my Civic. So I have to borrow my dad’s truck. I’d love to get a light pickup like the S-10 or Ranger used to be (and electric if it was available) but there’s nothing like that available these days because of American bullshit.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, you seem to need it, but almost every time I see a pickup truck, it is:

            • Driven by a white dude with no passengers
            • Has no cargo
            • Not hauling anything

            I full up my 11-gallon tank in my small 4-door car. I can’t imagine the expense of filing that up, nor the payments of purchasing one

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yea, that’s a big part of why I haven’t got one. For my daily commute my car is fine and very economical. If they still made small trucks a single cab with a full size bed would be perfect for me but that’s apparently not in line with what the rest of the country wants. If my dad sells his though I might have to bite the bullet.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m excited for affordable electric trucks.

          I do a lot of wood working as a hobby and some commissions for friends, and deeply regret having to sell my old F150 for a van. Now I have to rent a store pickup if I need to move large sheets of plywood or long pieces of dimensional lumber. I also work in the trades, and while it’s possible to move most of the stuff I need in my van, a pickup would be nice, as long as it doesn’t suck down gas like it’s got a hole in the tank.

          Having an electric pickup that doesn’t cost as much as a corvette would be really nice for my use case.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ain’t spending that stupid amount of money for either a Tesla or Rivian. Make something half the price that can run 300 miles, and you will have my attention, (the Chevy Bolt was so close).

        EVs are toys for the upper middle class and the rich.

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m still more interested in one than I am a Tesla.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or Mexico. And honestly I’m fine with that. Create some jobs outside of China for a change.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        China has been pretty well known for bringing in their own workers on foreign construction projects. They’re unapologetically nation building. I could easily see them continue to do so with manufacturing.

        I wouldn’t be surprised to find out a majority of US cars are manufactured with Chinese parts. The US is absolutely not nation building. The rust belt has been exported and nobody really wants to bring it back.

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    How can anyone see this and not see that the US is a manipulative shithole country? Champion of the free world markets except when they aren’t winning, then closed market manipulation and government interference.

    The US hasn’t been ahead for many years and they can’t innovate. So now they just want to keep out actual progress.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nobody wants to listen to reason or actually think any of this through they just want their artificially cheap products. The same people who claim to support unions and raising wages for average workers are now arguing against both because they might be able to get one new car out of the deal before all the competition crumbles and we’re back to high prices and beholden to China for all our automotive needs. It’s ridiculous to have to keep reading this hypocrisy over and over again.

        Apparently used vehicles are so 2020 and we should scrap all 220 million of them and build brand new ones because that’s what’s good for the environment.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s the same as the arguments for cheap big macs. Fair! Until it’s more expensive for me…

          People are clowns.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          they just want their artificially cheap products

          Because that’s all they can AFFORD due to gigantic corporations colluding to make housing, food, healthcare, medicine, and yes, cars artificially expensive.

          You’re acting like poverty is an irresponsible choice by the consumers rather than the inevitable effect of extreme corporate profiteering allowed because the politicians are receiving bribes.

          And yes, the president formerly known as The Senator from MBNA is very much one of those corrupt politicians.

          The same people who claim to support unions and raising wages for average workers are now arguing against both

          [Citation needed]

          the competition crumbles and we’re back to high prices

          That’s exactly what this ridiculously high tariff does: it removes competition so that American carmakers won’t have to lower their ridiculously high prices.

          beholden to China for all our automotive needs

          Yeah, because being beholden to the notoriously corrupt and abusive big US automakers and paying more for the privilege is MUCH better! 🙄

          it’s ridiculous to have to keep reading this hypocrisy over and over again.

          Is what I think every time party robots such as yourself who rightly castigated Trump for his harmful trade war with China but are now cheering on Biden doing the same with many of the same justifications.

          Apparently used vehicles are so 2020 and we should scrap all 220 million of them and build brand new ones because that’s what’s good for the environment.

          Burning Man called. They want their colossal strawman back.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because that’s all they can AFFORD due to gigantic corporations colluding to make housing, food, healthcare, medicine, and yes, cars

            What people are being forced to buy expensive new cars? I make decent money and always buy used because it’s a much better value.

            You’re acting like poverty is an irresponsible choice by the consumers rather than the inevitable effect of extreme corporate profiteering allowed because the politicians are receiving bribes.

            I’ve done nothing of the sort. You’re advocating for a bunch of US manufacturing workers to get laid off because you want to buy a new car for an unreasonably low price.

            [Citation needed]

            Are you joking? This is the entire topic of discussion.

            That’s exactly what this ridiculously high tariff does: it removes competition so that American carmakers won’t have to lower their ridiculously high prices.

            How does this remove competition? What it removes is the effects of unsustainable subsidies that artificially reduce the price of these cars. They’re free to compete with the rest of the industry on a level playing field.

            Yeah, because being beholden to the notoriously corrupt and abusive big US automakers and paying more for the privilege is MUCH better! 🙄

            In what way are we beholden to US automakers (Ford, GM, and Tesla)? What a ridiculous statement. Have you never been car shopping before? There’s a lot more brands for sale here than those three.

            Is what I think every time party robots such as yourself who rightly castigated Trump for his harmful trade war with China but are now cheering on Biden doing the same with many of the same justifications.

            So this is about party politics now? I think Biden and Trump are both pieces of shit. You can dig through my comment history if you don’t believe me.

            Burning Man called. They want their colossal strawman back.

            You must not have read through the comments here. Half of them are saying we’re all doomed if we can’t get our hands on these cheap new cars.

      • Magister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ford lost an estimated $36,000 on each of the 36,000 EVs it delivered to dealers in the third quarter.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re gonna need a source for that claim. I’ve read a lot about EVs and never once has anyone ever said BYD is selling at a loss.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        So what if the car is sold at a loss? I also find that extremely hard to believe when BYD Company has a net income of nearly $23 Billion dollars, and their largest subsidiary is BYD Auto.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The subsidy is included in that income. They are being paid by the Chinese govt in part or in particular to damage foreign manufacturing base and economies and to keep them out of China as a strategic move.

          “So what” is a fair question that deserves an answer. The most obvious concern is if they are able to hurt our manufacturing, we become reliant on their car’s and the prices go up and we start exporting more of our wealth and we as a nation become poorer and less able to fight back on predatory practices.

          There are also national defense considerations to having a weak manufacturing base. That’s why we are trying to build up our semiconductor capabilities because we are already too reliant on SE Asia for comfort.

          The Chevy Bolt was consistently praised as a wonderful EV, but last I heard GM lost money on it factoring in the battery recall, so I don’t think the goal here is to protect the “massive profits” by keeping prices high.

          Is this particular move the right one? Too much? Too little? All good questions and folks who know way more about it could have a healthy debate, but there are good reasons other than fucking over American car buyers. Walmart and Amazon have destroyed local retailers to our detriment, and that’s the sort of situation this aims to prevent. But I can’t say whether it’s the right solution or will ultimately work.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Very well thought out, thanks for replying and being honest that no one can accurately assess the outcome of this move yet.

            In my eyes, including subsidies in a company’s financials feels more honest than the alternative, though I’d like to see a breakdown of income vs subsidies. I also feel that criticisms of subsidies are hypocritical in this instance, considering that US farming is held up by duct tape, spit, and subsidies.

            I do also understand the concerns about being reliant on a single country’s manufacturing and how it could impact national defense, though I would like to submit that we’re already so reliant on Chinese manufacturing capabilities at this point that seeding discord like this is going to have some negative consequences in other markets manufactured in China.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have never seen proof that these cars are sold at a loss. I did read an article how they got giant grants to Kickstart their battery tech and production. So maybe someone is doing some weird back accounting for that?

          If someone does have a source of each individual vehicle being subsidized, I would love to see it.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    the way to do it is a mile based shipping tax on all goods, but congress would have to do that. This is just dumb.

    Edit: it does say these EV’s are subsidized