As per title really. I’m looking for a new small music player that will play MP3 and FLAC files. Preferably that takes a large SD card, otherwise has at least 128gb of storage. I want to be copying files directly on to it in a file browser and for them to play in the right order (I have a player that plays in the order the files were copied on to it, which is full on madness). I have no interest in iTunes and I run Linux as my computer OS.

Also needs to be less than £100.

And I really mean no wireless functionally at all, I don’t mean “includes Bluetooth but it can be turned off”.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    New?

    I highly doubt that exist.

    Mainstream?

    Nope.

    Best recommendation off of the top of my head?

    Used iPod mini that you flashmod and put Rockbox on it. then you put the files directly on it from what I can tell.

    The lack of hardware BT and WiFi is too restrictive of requirenments these days, and to be honest I don’t see the point of such a restriction, but eh, I am not the one looking for a device like that.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Isn’t stock iPod OS good enough? I remember it being instanteneous for things like playing next songs, or switching albums. That’s what I never experienced ever again. For YouTube Music it sometimes takes few seconds to play the next songs and it drives me crazy.

  • m_f@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The closest you’re going to find is probably the SanDisk Sansa Clip+. It can receive FM, but IIRC no wireless other than that. I don’t think it’s made new any more but you should be able to find it for less than £100 online.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Ok, now you are just being ridiculous.

        This is clearly a troll thread.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          12 days ago

          Based on the comment saying

          Can’t have it in the office.

          I don’t think this is a troll. I think OP works in a high-security setting, or around extremely sensitive equipment. I’m leaning toward the latter because I wouldn’t expect an SD card to be allowed in a high-security setting.

          • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 days ago

            But receiving FM doesn’t matter. Tons of things can receive FM that don’t broadcast, like tooth fillings.

          • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 days ago

            An FM receiver is purely passive. I mean there might be places with rules against it, but why? It doesn’t influence or affect anything…

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              FM receivers are capable of producing interference. Note their listing here.

              The weird thing about this post is that both of the obvious scenarios that would lead to the kind of restrictions OP’s workplace has don’t quite add up.

              • If radios are banned due to interference, random electronic devices like digital music players are also capable of producing interference. It’s surprising that any kind of personally owned electronic gadget is allowed.
              • If it’s a high-security environment, it’s surprising that any personally owned digital storage device is allowed.

              I wish OP would elaborate, not because I doubt them, but because the explanation is probably interesting.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            That is an absolute possibility, I had hoped OP would respond with something line:

            “I work with highly sensitive equipment, radios can cause then to report inaccurate data, so no radios!”

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              I have a friend who occasionally works in a SCIF. My impression is that a radio receiver would probably be allowed, but an SD card would not. That’s what makes me suspect it has to do with sensitive equipment, though I’d be a little surprised any electronic equipment not explicitly vetted is allowed in that situation.

      • m_f@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        I don’t know exactly what you’re avoiding wireless for, but it has no ability to transmit, only receive FM if that matters. You could fairly easily disconnect/break the antenna and permanently disable even that.

      • raynethackery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’ve had 3 Sansa Clip+ players. I never even accidentally switch to FM. I understand why your workplace bans Bluetooth. Mine does as well. Do they also ban the FM tuner?

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    OP most likely works in a SCIF - where such restrictions are pretty common.

    TL;DR OP is a fed or fed contractor

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        You dont without effort, but theres not really any modern Walkmans that dont connect to WiFi. You are pretty much limited to cassette and disc Walkman, maybe a minicd player. You could burn your FLACs to a CD if you wanted. I’ve looked at a few modern Walkmans and they are basically shitty android devices, a phone with a 3.5mm jack would be better.

  • nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    sound waves are a form of wireless transmission, better make sure to not connect any kind of speaker to it

  • SeekPie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    iPod 5th gen (aka Video), flash modded and with Rockbox.

    If going without Rockbox, Rhythmbox on Linux can upload mp3-s to the stock iPod but (IIRC) not flacs.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    Build your own? Given the constraints, that might actually be more viable than you’d think. Keep in mind, you could disable or even block radio transmitters to comply with whatever your environment is.

  • thirteene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    Go to Ali Express, and filter through the “mp3” results. They will cost less than $10, be made of the cheapest material possible but meet your requirements. Otherwise you are thrift store shopping

  • Otherbarry@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Think you would likely have to scour garage sales and used buy/sell sites for one of those ancient portable mp3 player devices. I remember the old iRiver devices did support FLAC natively but that was before 128GB storage existed so no idea how something like that would behave when you stick in a 128+ GB SD card into it.

    The other tricky part is that something that old/used may have a worn out battery so any device with a built-in battery may not stay on for very long.

    The other comment makes a good point, starting out you should focus on anything that https://www.rockbox.org/ supports since that’ll give you FLAC support. (besides the Archos, apparently it is impossible to play FLAC on those https://www.rockbox.org/wiki/WhyRockbox.html).

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The other tricky part is that something that old/used may have a worn out battery so any device with a built-in battery may not stay on for very long.

      If you can solder, you might be able to replace old batteries.

      Honestly, if you think about all the increasingly-aging hardware out there with built-in rechargeable batteries…given that some people would like to use them, the way there are people who like vintage hardware from earlier decades, there have to be some people out there who must specialize in replacing internal batteries.