• Dark ArcA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I’m okay with this one, but it’s mostly because Activision Blizzard has great IP with some seriously awful management … and Microsoft actually has been doing much better in that department for games.

      • demonquark@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… In practice, every time a company gets anything that even slightly resembles a captured market, they stop investing in quality and starting shafting consumers.

        Make no mistake, that is Microsoft’s end game. And that’s why they’re buying Blizzard.

        • leftzero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Luckily, Activision Blizzard already stopped investing in quality and started shafting customers quite a while back, so worst case scenario (in this particular case, your criticism is still valid for most others) nothing changes, best case scenario Microsoft actually cleans house and the market becomes slightly less anti-consumer with one of the worst offenders gone…

        • Dark ArcA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Microsoft even with Activision Blizzard would not have a captured market. Valve, Crytek, Sony (which now holds Bungie), Epic, Electronic Arts, CD Projekt Red, Take-Two, and Ubisoft are all still quite potent AAA capable studio just in the PC space … along with tons of independent studios (e.g., Ghost Ship Games, Shiro Games, Hello Games, Re-Logic).

          The Microsoft internal doc leak said they’re mostly after King Games (mobile games) anyways. I’d wager at worst Microsoft will let the traditionally Activision & Blizzard studios do their things… at best they’ll clean up the executive teams and let the devs “play” a bit more with the IPs.

          Mojang has flourished under Microsoft.

          • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            343 sucked under MS. Bethesda’s been underwhelming. Rare, meh. Lionhead, meh. Obsidian, meh.

            Playground has been good, same with Doublefine. Ninja had Senua, which was good.

            Pretty much a coin flip I’d say, but helped by the fact Blizzard has stunk out loud in recent years…change might be good.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The enshitification of Mojang has begun. Ridiculous privacy policies and bans in singleplayer. And the biggest introduction under MS was the engine rewrite, which was already underway when they were acquired.

        • Dark ArcA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, it’s had plenty of success with its own IP… Heard of Starfield? Minecraft … and it’s nth successful Spinoff? Forza Horizon 5? Sea of Thieves? Flight Simulator 40th Anniversary Edition? Age of Empires IV? Age of Empires XYZ DE? Fallout 76?

          The only major “flop” I can think of that wasn’t corrected (at least so far) is Halo Infinite and … that largely seems to be a 343 issue. There’s also Redfall, but that was a new IP in an over saturated space … it’s not like they’ve stopped developing IPs, fixing games, and trying new things.

            • Dark ArcA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Go look at Fallout 76’s reviews, it was unpopular at launch (IIRC) but it’s doing very well now … and that’s the point, they kept the lights on until the majority of players were happy.

              Minecraft has had several games derived from it, that were entirely different games set in the Minecraft universe.

              Microsoft bought Bethesda 3 years ago. To say that they had no ability to influence and/or didn’t take a risk on Starfield is … lazy at best.

              And yes, they own Redfall as well, time will tell if they fix that one or it’s just a straight up failure.

    • Pohl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trust = one or more independent organizations making secret agreements to mutual benefit.

      Mergers: not a trust.

      Monopoly = a single organization that controls an overwhelming amount of the market.

      Microsoft buying a publisher that put out 2 games in 2023: not a monopoly.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How many times do they have to buy that 2 game publisher before they reach a monopoly?

        • Pohl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many games game out this year? Thousands. There is absolutely zero possibility that MS or anyone else is anywhere near holding monopoly status on the production of entertainment software. Even if they bought EVERYTHING new creators would enter the space the very next day.

    • probablyaCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meh. A competitive monopoly has a better outcome than the near monopoly PS4 got when it came to exclusives. Yeah a lot of existing IP will be for one or the other. But for third party studios, they will be much less likely to make exclusive games if the console market is more balanced between the two. Nintendo is kind of in a world of its own. And with the steam deck helping push PC into a base level standard, I think we might see some opening up of high quality third party stuff.

  • Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Activision Blizzard has become such a huge pile of disgusting shit that people are quite tempted to see what would happen if the devil Microsoft buys it.

    What a time to be alive

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, never thought I’d live the day to see it but here we are. Blizzard use to be the darling of all gamers, only one who did things right and released games when they were actually done. Then money hungry shitheads took over.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m just happy to potentially see Bobby Kotick, Ion Hazzikostas, Mike Ybarra, etc ousted.

      Don’t get me wrong. Fifteen years ago I would have flipped if Microsoft put in a bid to buy Vivendi and get their paws on Blizzard, after seeing how badly they ruined Rare. Activision tanked the brand so bad that I’m actually rooting for Microsoft.

      • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think Kotick is at all certain to be kicked out. As easily as I can see MS letting him go with an enormous golden parachute, I can just as easily imagine them keeping him onboard because all they care about is Activision’s ability to make money.

        In all likelihood Blizzard isn’t going to be managed any differently. Microsoft’s modus operandi with gaming acquisitions is to leave the leadership in place and let the dev/publisher run itself. Why is everyone expecting different here? The most likely outcome is MS does nothing to Blizzard and Blizzard continues on more or less the same trajectory as before.

  • Cosmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Now: “Don’t worry! Call of Duty will remain on the Playstation! We have a 10-year agreement!”

    Next week: “leaked: internal memo, Microsoft renaming to Call of Doods, to be Xbox exclusive”

  • navi@lemmy.tespia.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    One good thing to come of this (hopefully) is the chance to clear the C Suite people from AKB. I hope all of the AKB employees get what they deserve, which is a new set of higher ups that aren’t sexist dickbags.

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was done with Activision BEFORE Microsoft came along.

    Not with a 100 foot pole. Get fukt Activision

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The decisions made do not reflect what the developers want. Honestly, they’ve done a good job. Blizzard has just made them make shitty things. Technically they are good games, just not as an experience.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Warcraft reforged barely even functions compared to the original game that they ruined. The whole company is trash from the top to the bottom.

        • crius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is classic ignorant take of the average user that don’t know how corporate gaming industry works.

          The “developers”, the actual engineers, don’t decide shit, some manager that only care for what the higher ups are telling them. And what the higher ups are telling is the same in all corporates: Increase the cash flow.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I think they’re going to continue adding massive value to the Gamepass system to keep it afloat and competitive. Maybe a WoW sub is a bit of a stretch, but basically all other games will thrive on the platform. StarCraft 2 is still the benchmark RTS for competitive play. Overwatch and Diablo are not my cups of tea but they would also make great offerings on the platform. Most of Blizzard’s core franchises outside of WoW itself are heavily MTX’d out the ass, battle passes, cosmetics, whatever - even if it’s included in the gamepass sub, the theoretical higher volume of players will likely compensate for unit sales through the aforementioned MTX.

        • rivalary@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are going to play classic Microsoft and destroy their competition in this way, then they will do what they want when they have a stranglehold on the market.

          • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think Sony is going to give up that easily, nor is Nintendo or Valve.

            Microsoft has tried, with sheer force of capital to buy out these players and couldn’t understand when they were denied. In tech you can do big mergers and acquisitions with sheer capital but Nintendo is a pride and joy crown jewel of Japanese industry, and no amount of money would allow MS to buy them.

            MS’ big push for accessibility and cloud gaming makes them ultimately platform agnostic over time, because they are leveraging the cloud technology to deploy their catalogue on any machine with an internet connection and a screen.

            “Classic” Microsoft, the EEE (envelop, extend, extinguish) strategy that made them assholes through the 90s and early aughts hasn’t been nearly as prevalent in the current Nadella era. More often than not MS has been forking open source projects or simply contributing to them in their own ways rather than building proprietary systems.

    • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This would be dope for all the WoWheads being adopted by MS (I’m one). If I’m bored with everything I just revert to WoW. If my subscription included Gamepass, I may be more inclined to check out titles I wouldn’t otherwise play.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny that I lead with this because I had a minute to think about it and honestly I kind of just don’t care. Dragonflight did not renew my hopes for retail, although it had some neat mechanic changes. Classic will be over for me probably by the end of January, unless they announce basically Classic+ based around the WOTLK talents. I am going to get my Shadowmourne, kill Arthas on heroic, and then go play FFXIV.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know this isn’t a popular opinion but I’m actually pretty optimistic about this. Blizzard has been shit for a while and this will at least change things, even if it might be for the worse. Also give me their entire catalogue on gamepass pls.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Blizzard’s only game worth playing is HOTS and it’s a prime candidate for being trimmed out

      But I don’t expect this to improve the rest of Blizzard

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s fine, they already turned into shit.

    Microsoft will make it worse but it’s easy to avoid this stuff, unlike Github.

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is, even if they get rid of bobby kotick, he still wins. He is going to walk a way with millions of dollars in a separation agreement.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let me dream of some clause in this contract which he breached and no one dared point it out. Ruined reputation or something.

        • regbin_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I paid for Overwatch too but tbh I’d rather have Overwatch 2. There’s no loot box bullcrap and the playerbase now is actually pretty sizeable now compared to OW1 near the end.

          I do miss the free rewards but they’re just cosmetics. A bigger playerbase is more beneficial to the game than more free skins.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are some games made by SC devs or SC players, we’ll see how it turns out. I would like to see SC3 with full financial support of a AAA studio.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Aoe 4 wasn’t great and that was AAA support. The people that made SC great are gone, most are at frostgiant, Dreamhaven, Warchief, and more.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah okay, let me want what I want instead of trying to convince me not to

      • kemsat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah nah, StarCraft: Ghost is coming back. It’s just a matter of using the Gears of War engine & adding in StarCraft textures & models & SFX.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can bet your sweet ass CoD will be part of it. Possibly not MW3 but the next game will be a big day 1 game pass launch, guaranteed.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they’ll make warzone no longer free to play but instead included in game pass as a means of recruiting more members.