• artifex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the one hand, I understand the inherent limitations of pseudonymous social media and why a corporation and even end users might benefit from authoritative user identification.

    On the other hand, oh hell no.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, there’s someone here who has (not even exaggerating) 15+ accounts that they just rotate thru.

      It’s a hassle to block them all because I still see new ones, but I’ll take that over “proving myself” as a unique person with something like this.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t think psudonyms are an issue, but verifying that a user is an actual person vs an AI chatbot is absolutely something that every popular social media platform will need to tackle at some point.

      • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hmm funny how Sam Altman is one of the few people responsible for creating that problem and now he’s selling the solution to it

        • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s actually low-key brilliant. Start a gold rush, when you realize the gold isn’t actually there, pivot to selling shovels and keep hyping the gold rush. Fools and their money are soon parted, and there seem to be an endless supply of them.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The bot problem has been around since before Sam Altman was old enough to legally drink. For example in the early days the founders of Reddit were running bots to make the site look wayyy busier than it actually was in order to attract new users.

          He’s a convenient bogey-man, and a huge asshole, but he’s the not the source of this problem.

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Will they though? Facebook has already created undisclosed bot accounts themselves before. A Platform where real users and such bots are indistinguishable (for the user) sounds like a social media corpos and authoritarian governments wet dream to me. Also reminds me of the attempts to disguise ads as natural content.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure but they only want the bots they approve of. That way they can charge for the privilege of allowing someone’s preferred bots onto the platform.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As explained, it’s not even quite user identification, but rather verification of a unique individual. The ability to identify that an account is held by a unique person (as opposed to possibility being one of many puppet accounts) is pretty useful, particularly if it’s not possible to backtrace it to an otherwise identifiable person.

      Even so, the problem I see with this system is that a person has to be careful to never, ever, ever associate their unique ID with themselves, though there will be constant pressure to do so.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I will happily forego any/all social media (and never look back) rather than submit to such an idiotic, intrusive, perverse, and disgusting system.

      🤦‍♀️ 🙄 🤡 🖕 💩

    • happydoors@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      But think of all the convenience you gain by not having to remember a password! That darn brain of mine

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    If World ID becomes one of Reddit’s third-party providers, it would be good news for Tools for Humanity, which was founded six years ago with the lofty goal of providing a universal basic income to the world by offering them cryptocurrency called Worldcoin in exchange for scanning their eyeballs with an Orb.

    What the actual fuck.

    Seriously how on Earth is that supposed to work?

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I read about this a few years ago, and even saw them in a mall in Western EU.

      The whole thing is just bio-data mining, and they started by preying on some poor regions in Africa

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Selling data on people is a lucrative business. Although it is a business and not UBI.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Okay I’ve scanned my eyeball and I’ve got some of their worthless cryptocurrency. What about next month, do they want me to scan my eyeball again, because I guarantee it won’t have changed.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It could probably be worth it to keep an active eye on your data even if it remains roughly the same. To keep an established base line, to keep an eye out for changes in environment in specific areas, to monitor the effects of aging, to sell you shit when your eye gets damaged. Probably other evil shit too, or just the paranoid urge to surveil people for no damn reason.

  • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    So this guy helps create a technology that turns bots up to 11 and then he turns around to sell us a privacy invasive solution to the problem he created? What a fucking asshole.

    • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t he an accelerationist? To them the more fuck ups we have the more solutions we make, which is pretty stupid of an argument in my opinion.

      • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree. We obviously need to make huge changes to how we live asap, but it seems so profoundly stupid to let a few unelected people break things without a collectively agreed upon plan in place.

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Scan your biounique eyeball to provide ID whilst retaining your anonymity???

    Anonymity and the ability for someone else to prove it was me are nearly opposites.

    • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      It works: You can tell the real humans because they’ll be the only ones unwilling to do this invasive bullshit. The bots will just come up with something fake to scan and carry on as they always have.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The bots will just come up with something fake to scan and carry on as they always have.

        Like a real human eye? Is this how Skynet starts?

        • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wouldn’t it just be reverse engineering what the scanner does? If you have a close enough copy of thesnanning tech couldn’t you have a bot rapidly iterate eyeballs in some form till it can pass the real version a couple times and repeat with the iteration process?

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    Humans with human eyeballs are still using Reddit? I thought it was just bots moderating bots by now.

  • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who TF is actually going to want to use these platforms bad enough to do this shit?

    Facebook sucks and has for quite some time.

    Reddit is mainly just very poorly disguised government surveillance and AI generated advertisement, and none of the content is even enjoyable or enticing. Who TF is their target audience?

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wish. I have noticed that I don’t see many Lenny endorsements anymore, I wonder if they remove those (I know my comment has been removed couple of times).

      • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Probably still do quite a lot. I still have my account there in case there are calls to promote the fediverse.

        They left Digg posts alone for now though. I know it’s another boiling pot, dont have to remind me.