All our servers and company laptops went down at pretty much the same time. Laptops have been bootlooping to blue screen of death. It’s all very exciting, personally, as someone not responsible for fixing it.

Apparently caused by a bad CrowdStrike update.

Edit: now being told we (who almost all generally work from home) need to come into the office Monday as they can only apply the fix in-person. We’ll see if that changes over the weekend…

  • jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reading into the updates some more… I’m starting to think this might just destroy CloudStrike as a company altogether. Between the mountain of lawsuits almost certainly incoming and the total destruction of any public trust in the company, I don’t see how they survive this. Just absolutely catastrophic on all fronts.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      123
      ·
      2 months ago

      If all the computers stuck in boot loop can’t be recovered… yeah, that’s a lot of cost for a lot of businesses. Add to that all the immediate impact of missed flights and who knows what happening at the hospitals. Nightmare scenario if you’re responsible for it.

      This sort of thing is exactly why you push updates to groups in stages, not to everything all at once.

      • rxxrc@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        2 months ago

        Looks like the laptops are able to be recovered with a bit of finagling, so fortunately they haven’t bricked everything.

        And yeah staged updates or even just… some testing? Not sure how this one slipped through.

        • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          127
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not sure how this one slipped through.

          I’d bet my ass this was caused by terrible practices brought on by suits demanding more “efficient” releases.

          “Why do we do so much testing before releases? Have we ever had any problems before? We’re wasting so much time that I might not even be able to buy another yacht this year”

            • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              39
              ·
              2 months ago

              Certainly not! Or other industries for that matter. It’s a good thing executives everywhere aren’t just concentrating on squeezing the maximum amount of money out of their companies and funneling it to themselves and their buddies on the board.

              Sure, let’s “rightsize” the company by firing 20% of our workforce (but not management!) and raise prices 30%, and demand that the remaining employees maintain productivity at the level it used to be before we fucked things up. Oh and no raises for the plebs, we can’t afford it. Maybe a pizza party? One slice per employee though.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed, this will probably kill them over the next few years unless they can really magic up something.

      They probably don’t get sued - their contracts will have indemnity clauses against exactly this kind of thing, so unless they seriously misrepresented what their product does, this probably isn’t a contract breach.

      If you are running crowdstrike, it’s probably because you have some regulatory obligations and an auditor to appease - you aren’t going to be able to just turn it off overnight, but I’m sure there are going to be some pretty awkward meetings when it comes to contract renewals in the next year, and I can’t imagine them seeing much growth

      • Skydancer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah. This has happened with every major corporate antivirus product. Multiple times. And the top IT people advising on purchasing decisions know this.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep. This is just uninformed people thinking this doesn’t happen. It’s been happening since av was born. It’s not new and this will not kill CS they’re still king.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          At my old shop we still had people giving money to checkpoint and splunk, despite numerous problems and a huge cost, because they had favourites.

      • jedibob5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Don’t most indemnity clauses have exceptions for gross negligence? Pushing out an update this destructive without it getting caught by any quality control checks sure seems grossly negligent.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        explain to the project manager with crayons why you shouldn’t do this

        Can’t; the project manager ate all the crayons

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why is it bad to do on a Friday? Based on your last paragraph, I would have thought Friday is probably the best week day to do it.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Most companies, mine included, try to roll out updates during the middle or start of a week. That way if there are issues the full team is available to address them.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        rolling out an update to production that there was clearly no testing

        Or someone selected “env2” instead of “env1” (#cattleNotPets names) and tested in prod by mistake.

        Look, it’s a gaffe and someone’s fired. But it doesn’t mean fuck ups are endemic.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not sure what you’d expect to be able to do in a safe mode with no disk access.

    • ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you’re on the nose, here. I laughed at the headline, but the more I read the more I see how fucked they are. Airlines. Industrial plants. Fucking governments. This one is big in a way that will likely get used as a case study.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah saw that several steel mills have been bricked by this, that’s months and millions to restart

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Got a link? I find it hard to believe that a process like that would stop because of a few windows machines not booting.

          • drspod@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 months ago

            Those machines should be airgapped and no need to run Crowdstrike on them. If the process controller machines of a steel mill are connected to the internet and installing auto updates then there really is no hope for this world.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There are a lot of heavy manufacturing tools that are controlled and have their interface handled by Windows under the hood.

          They’re not all networked, and some are super old, but a more modernized facility could easily be using a more modern version of Windows and be networked to have flow of materials, etc more tightly integrated into their systems.

          The higher precision your operation, the more useful having much more advanced logs, networked to a central system, becomes in tracking quality control.

          Imagine if after the fact, you could track a set of .1% of batches that are failing more often and look at the per second logs of temperature they were at during the process, and see that there’s 1° temperature variance between the 30th to 40th minute that wasn’t experienced by the rest of your batches. (Obviously that’s nonsense because I don’t know anything about the actual process of steel manufacturing. But I do know that there’s a lot of industrial manufacturing tooling that’s an application on top of windows, and the higher precision your output needs to be, the more useful it is to have high quality data every step of the way.)

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t we blame MS at least as much? How does MS let an update like this push through their Windows Update system? How does an application update make the whole OS unable to boot? Blue screens on Windows have been around for decades, why don’t we have a better recovery system?

      • sandalbucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Crowdstrike runs at ring 0, effectively as part of the kernel. Like a device driver. There are no safeguards at that level. Extreme testing and diligence is required, because these are the consequences for getting it wrong. This is entirely on crowdstrike.

      • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They can have all the clauses they like but pulling something like this off requires a certain amount of gross negligence that they can almost certainly be held liable for.

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          For what? At best it would be a hearing on the challenges of national security with industry.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The four multinational corporations I worked at were almost entirely Windows servers with the exception of vendor specific stuff running Linux. Companies REALLY want that support clause in their infrastructure agreement.

      • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve worked as an IT architect at various companies in my career and you can definitely get support contracts for engineering support of RHEL, Ubuntu, SUSE, etc. That isn’t the issue. The issue is that there are a lot of system administrators with “15 years experience in Linux” that have no real experience in Linux. They have experience googling for guides and tutorials while having cobbled together documents of doing various things without understanding what they are really doing.

        I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen an enterprise patch their Linux solutions (if they patched them at all with some ridiculous rubberstamped PO&AM) manually without deploying a repo and updating the repo treating it as you would a WSUS. Hell, I’m pleasantly surprised if I see them joined to a Windows domain (a few times) or an LDAP (once but they didn’t have a trust with the Domain Forest or use sudoer rules…sigh).

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The issue is that there are a lot of system administrators with “15 years experience in Linux” that have no real experience in Linux.

          Reminds me of this guy I helped a few years ago. His name was Bob, and he was a sysadmin at a predominantly Windows company. The software I was supporting, however, only ran on Linux. So since Bob had been a UNIX admin back in the 80s they picked him to install the software.

          But it had been 30 years since he ever touched a CLI. Every time I got on a call with him, I’d have to give him every keystroke one by one, all while listening to him complain about how much he hated it. After three or four calls I just gave up and used the screenshare to do everything myself.

          AFAIK he’s still the only Linux “sysadmin” there.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Companies REALLY want that support clause in their infrastructure agreement.

        RedHat, Ubuntu, SUSE - they all exist on support contracts.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dunno, but doesn’t like a quarter of the internet kinda run on Azure?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        doesn’t like a quarter of the internet kinda run on Azure?

        Said another way, 3/4 of the internet isn’t on Unsure cloud blah-blah.

        And azure is - shhh - at least partially backed by Linux hosts. Didn’t they buy an AWS clone and forcibly inject it with money like Bobby Brown on a date in the hopes of building AWS better than AWS like they did with nokia? MS could be more protectively diverse than many of its best customers.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve had my PC shut down for updates three times now, while using it as a Jellyfin server from another room. And I’ve only been using it for this purpose for six months or so.

      I can’t imagine running anything critical on it.

      • ccdfa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Windows server, the OS, runs differently from desktop windows. So if you’re using desktop windows and expecting it to run like a server, well, that’s on you. However, I ran windows server 2016 and then 2019 for quite a few years just doing general homelab stuff and it is really a pain compared to Linux which I switched to on my server about a year ago. Server stuff is just way easier on Linux in my experience.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          It doesn’t have to, though. Linux manages to do both just fine, with relatively minor compromises.

          Expecting an OS to handle keeping software running is not a big ask.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yup, I use Linux to run a Jellyfin server, as well as a few others things. The only problem is that the CPU I’m using (Ryzen 1st gen) will crash every couple weeks or so (known hardware fault, I never bothered to RMA), but that’s honestly not that bad since I can just walk over and restart it. Before that, it ran happily on an old Phenom II from 2009 for something like 10 years (old PC), and I mostly replaced it because the Ryzen uses a bit less electricity (enough that I used to turn the old PC off at night; this one runs 24/7 as is way more convenient).

            So aside from this hardware issue, Linux has been extremely solid. I have a VPS that tunnels traffic into my Jellyfin and other services from outside, and it pretty much never goes down (I guess the host reboots it once a year or something for hardware maintenance). I run updates when I want to (when I remember, which is about monthly), and it only goes down for like 30 sec to reboot after updates are applied.

            So yeah, Linux FTW, once it’s set up, it just runs.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              not that bad since I can just walk over and restart it.

              You can try to use watchdog to automatically restart on crashes. Or go through RMA.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I could, but it’s a pretty rare nuisance. I’d rather just replace the CPU than go through RMA, a newer gen CPU is quite inexpensive, I could probably get by with a <$100 CPU since anything AM4 should work (I have an X370 with support for 5XXX series CPUs).

                I’m personally looking at replacing it with a much lower power chip, like maybe something ARM. I just haven’t found something that would fit well since I need 2-4 SATA (PCIe card could work), 16GB+ RAM, and a relatively strong CPU. I’m hopeful that with ARM Snapdragon chips making their way to laptops and RISC-V getting more available, I’ll find something that’ll fit that niche well. Otherwise, I’ll just upgrade when my wife or I upgrade, which is what I usually do.

                • uis@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I just haven’t found something that would fit well since I need 2-4 SATA (PCIe card could work), 16GB+ RAM, and a relatively strong CPU.

                  4 SATA, 8GB RAM is easy to find. What do you need 16 gigs for? Compiling Gentoo?

                  Star64 for ARM and Quartz64 for RV.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            big ask.

            Off the car lot, we say ‘request’. But good on you for changing careers.

        • ji17br@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wow dude you’re so cool. I bet that made you feel so superior. Everyone on here thinks you are so badass.

    • neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know i was really surprised how many there are. But honestly think of how many companies are using active directory and azure

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah my plans of going to sleep last night were thoroughly dashed as every single windows server across every datacenter I manage between two countries all cried out at the same time lmao

    • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always wondered who even used windows server given how marginal its marketshare is. Now i know from the news.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Marginal? You must be joking. A vast amount of servers run on Windows Server. Where I work alone we have several hundred and many companies have a similar setup. Statista put the Windows Server OS market share over 70% in 2019. While I find it hard to believe it would be that high, it does clearly indicate it’s most certainly not a marginal percentage.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not getting an account on Statista, and I agree that its marketshare isn’t “marginal” in practice, but something is up with those figures, since overwhelmingly internet hosted services are on top of Linux. Internal servers may be a bit different, but “servers” I’d expect to count internet servers…

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              There are a ton of Internet facing servers, vast majority of cloud instances, and every cloud provider except Microsoft (and their in house “windows” for azure hosting is somehow different, though they aren’t public about it).

              In terms of on premise servers, I’d even say the HPC groups may outnumber internal windows servers. While relatively fewer instances, they all represent racks and racks of servers, and that market is 100% Linux.

              I know a couple of retailers and at least two game studios are keeping at scale windows a thing, but Linux mostly dominates my experience of large scale deployment in on premise scale out.

              It just seems like Linux is just so likely for scenarios that also have lots of horizontal scaling, it is hard to imagine that despite that windows still being a majority share of the market when all is said and done, when it’s usually deployed in smaller quantities in any given place.

          • Pringles@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s stated in the synopsis, below where it says you need to pay for the article. Anyway, it might be true as the hosting servers themselves often host up to hundreds of Windows machines. But it really depends on what is measured and the method used, which we don’t know because who the hell has a statista account anyway.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            since overwhelmingly internet hosted services are on top of Linux

            This is a common misconception. Most internet hosted services are behind a Linux box, but that doesn’t mean those services actually run on Linux.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I’ve seen some, but they usually don’t have automatic updates and generally do not have access to the Internet.

      • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a crowdstrike issue specifically related to the falcon sensor. Happens to affect only windows hosts.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s only marginal for running custom code. Every large organization has at least a few of them running important out-of-the-box services.

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not too long ago, a lot of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software ran on MS SQL Server. Businesses made significant investments in software and training, and some of them don’t have the technical, financial, or logistical resources to adapt - momentum keeps them using Windows Server.

        For example, small businesses that are physically located in rural areas can’t use cloud based services because rural internet is too slow and unreliable. Its not quite the case that there’s no amount of money you can pay for a good internet connection in rural America, but last time I looked into it, Verizon wanted to charge me $20,000 per mile to run a fiber optic cable from the nearest town to my client’s farm.

      • Eril@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        My current company does and I hate it so much. Who even got that idea in the first place? Linux always dominated server-side stuff, no?

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You should read the saga of when MS bought Hotmail. The work they had to do to be able to run it on Windows was incredible. It actually helped MS improve their server OS, and it still wasn’t as performance when they switched over.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In university computer science, in the states, MS server was the main server OS that they taught my class during our education.

          Microsoft loses money to let the universities and students use and learn MS server for free, or at least they did at the time. This had the effect of making a lot of fresh grad developers more comfortable with using MS server, and I’m sure it led to MS server being used in cases where there were better options.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, but the developers learned on Windows, so they wrote software for Windows.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I work in a datacenter, but no Windows. I slept so well.

          Though a couple years back some ransomware that also impacted Linux ran through, but I got to sleep well because it only bit people with easily guessed root passwords. It bit a lot of other departments at the company though.

          This time even the Windows folks were spared, because CrowdStrike wasn’t the solution they infested themselves with (they use other providers, who I fully expect to screw up the same way one day).

  • richtellyard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is going to be a Big Deal for a whole lot of people. I don’t know all the companies and industries that use Crowdstrike but I might guess it will result in airline delays, banking outages, and hospital computer systems failing. Hopefully nobody gets hurt because of it.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    CrowdStrike: It’s Friday, let’s throw it over the wall to production. See you all on Monday!

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wow, I didn’t realize CrowdStrike was widespread enough to be a single point of failure for so much infrastructure. Lot of airports and hospitals offline.

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) imposed the global ground stop for airlines including United, Delta, American, and Frontier.

    Flights grounded in the US.

    The System is Down

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe centralizing everything onto one company’s shoulders wasn’t such a great idea after all…

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wait, monopolies are bad? This is the first I’ve ever heard of this concept. So much so that I actually coined the term “monopoly” just now to describe it.

        • joostjakob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Someone should invent a game, that while playing demonstrates how much monopolies suck for everyone involved (except the monopolist)

          • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            And make it so you lose friends and family over the course of the 4+ hour game. Also make a thimble to fight over, that would be dope.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m sure a game that’s so on the nose with its message could never become a commercialised marketing gimmick that perversely promotes existing monopolies. Capitalists wouldn’t dare.

        • tibi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Crowdstrike is not a monopoly. The problem here was having a single point of failure, using a piece of software that can access the kernel and autoupdate running on every machine in the organization.

          At the very least, you should stagger updates. Any change done to a business critical server should be validated first. Automatic updates are a bad idea.

          Obviously, crowdstrike messed up, but so did IT departments in every organization that allowed this to happen.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Monopolies aren’t absolute, ever, but having nearly 25% market share is a problem, and is a sign of an oligopoly. Crowdstrike has outsized power and has posted article after article boasting of its dominant market position for many years running.

            I think monopoly-like conditions have become so normalised that people don’t even recognise them for what they are.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well now that I’ve invented the concept for the first time, we should invent laws about it. We’ll get in early, develop a monopoly on monopoly legislation and steer it so it benefits us.

            Wow, monopolies rule!

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, I’m sure those companies that have them don’t think so—when they aren’t the cause of muti-industry collapses.

    • nintendiator@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since when has any antivirus ever had the intent of actually protecting against viruses? The entire antivirus market is a scam.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly my philosophy these days, when it comes to anything proprietary. They just can’t keep their grubby little fingers off of working software.

      At least this time it was an accident.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    The thought of a local computer being unable to boot because some remote server somewhere is unavailable makes me laugh and sad at the same time.

    • rxxrc@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. As far as I know it’s an issue with a driver installed on the computers, not with anything trying to reach out to an external server. If that were the case you’d expect it to fail to boot any time you don’t have an Internet connection.

      Windows is bad but it’s not that bad yet.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        expect it to fail to boot any time you don’t have an Internet connection.

        So, like the UbiSoft umbilical but for OSes.

        Edit: name of publisher not developer.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A remote server that you pay some serious money to that pushes a garbage driver that prevents yours from booting

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not only does it (possibly) prevent booting, but it will also bsod it first so you’ll have to see how lucky you get.

        Goddamn I hate crowdstrike. Between this and them fucking up and letting malware back into a system, I have nothing nice to say about them.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s bsod on boot

          And anything encrypted with bitlocker can’t even go into safe mode to fix it

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It doesn’t consistently bsod on boot, about half of affected machines did in our environment, but all of them did experience a bsod while running. A good amount of ours just took the bad update, bsod’d and came back up.

  • aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 months ago

    https://www.theregister.com/ has a series of articles on what’s going on technically.

    Latest advice…

    There is a faulty channel file, so not quite an update. There is a workaround…

    1. Boot Windows into Safe Mode or WRE.

    2. Go to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\CrowdStrike

    3. Locate and delete file matching “C-00000291*.sys”

    4. Boot normally.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yep, this is the stupid timeline. Y2K happening to to the nuances of calendar systems might have sounded dumb at the time, but it doesn’t now. Y2K happening because of some unknown contractor’s YOLO Friday update definitely is.

  • ari_verse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    A few years ago when my org got the ask to deploy the CS agent in linux production servers and I also saw it getting deployed in thousands of windows and mac desktops all across, the first thought that came to mind was “massive single point of failure and security threat”, as we were putting all the trust in a single relatively small company that will (has?) become the favorite target of all the bad actors across the planet. How long before it gets into trouble, either because if it’s own doing or due to others?

    I guess that we now know

  • BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m so exhausted… This is madness. As a Linux user I’ve busy all day telling people with bricked PCs that Linux is better but there are just so many. It never ends. I think this is outage is going to keep me busy all weekend.