• Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Sleeping in a car that you own.

    I think there should be restrictions on where to park for this, but in general people found sleeping in cars should be protected by the law against theft and harassment.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Restrictions on where you can park

      Nah fuck that noise. This is how you let them corral you into slums.

      Park where you want. Out front of parliament, the prime minister’s house, on the street out front a billionaires house, wherever. If they don’t like it, them they should fix it.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Well, I mean, someone’s evil ex shouldn’t park in front of their house. And people should not park for a nap in a handicap spot. And not in the driving portion of a road, not in the breakdown lane of a major highway, not on anyone’s lawn.

        But yeah, basically any place where parking is allowed, sleeping while parked should be allowed and protected.

        • gothic_lemons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          29 days ago

          All of those places already have laws preventing those. Don’t need a special one for no sleep in car in those instances

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            It is. It is a good place to park. That’s not what is being discussed.

            Having a place to live is an unmitigable human need. Having a car is not. A car left too long on public land should become a shelter for OTHERS.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      The shady part is that most people who get bothered for sleeping in their cars is because they’re doing it somewhere on private property.

      Other than that, fully agree.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I don’t think it’s illegal, but rather where you park can make it illegal.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        In the US, it depends on the State or municipality. I’ve slept in my car plenty of times while traveling, although it was often in parking garages and out of sight, so maybe I just got lucky. It will really depend on how uptight the town or store manager is. I’ve heard that RVs are generally welcome at Walmarts, so I’d like to heard the logic on why RV are ok to sleep in but not cars.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    30 days ago

    Weed (not legal in all states)

    Most hallucinogens (at least for medical or supervised use)

    Being trans (lotta states trying to ban me)

    Being gay (they’re probably next)

    Abortion (many states ban this now)

    Free healthcare (not technically illegal, per se)

    Being homeless

    Polyamory (not technically illegal afaik, but there are a lot of legal benefits that married couples get which aren’t extended to polyamorous relationships due marriage being restricted to couples only)

    The list goes on because while there are many basic things that aren’t technically illegal, the system is set up in a way to fuck you because of the required profit motive behind offering basic necessities in a capitalist society.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    29 days ago

    Abortion. No specific circumstances needed. If a woman wants an abortion, it should be allowed. There is no one getting late term abortions that didn’t want the child and something tragic happened and now they need one.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      29 days ago

      As a caveat to the last sentence, it’s definitely possible for women to not know they’re pregnant until very late in the process. There have even been women who only found out they were pregnant when they went into labor.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        That’s not a gotcha, it’s very simple. Doctors decide whether a fetus is viable outside the womb, and if it is, then it’s a birth. The line for this keeps shifting earlier as neonatal medicine improves. Doctors aren’t going to destroy a child that can live, they took a hypocratic oath. Once it’s outside on its own, “my body my choice” no longer applies.

        In fact, the opposite is frequently a problem, where enormous intervention is given to keep an extremely premature child alive when all you are doing is guaranteeing them a lot of suffering. There are plenty of parents who wish in retrospect that the option to simply not intervene had been offered, because they see how much pain their child goes through. It is already perfectly fine, legally and ethically, to decide that a child is simply too weak to have a good quality of life. You can offer them milk (if they feed on their own that is a sign of good health and probably won’t ever happen with a case like this), but after that hold them and say goodbye.

        People talking about late term abortions and killing babies after ripping them out of the womb at 40 weeks are completely divorced from reality. That’s Alex Jones level bullshit.

  • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    29 days ago

    Prostitution. Keeping it illegal makes it so much worse for everyone involved except human traffickers.

      • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        I love the idea of someone being brought up for tax evasion charges because they were only claiming a blowjob rate when they were doing anal.

        This could be the most interesting audit in the history of the IRS.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          In my country, to crack down on tax evasion by small businesses people can give their tax payer number when they buy something (say food at a restaurant) and a copy of the receipt automatically gets passed on to the taxman (there’s a lottery on those and people can get some money from it, which is how the State incentivises people to do this, plus you can get some tax discounts on some kinds of expenses such as medicine).

          All this to say that the idea of the taxman getting a copy of an itemized receipt for sex work services is just delicious.

          PS: Around here sex work is unregulated, meaning not illegal (though profiting of other people’s sex work is illegal) but not explicitly legal and regulated.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    Euthanasia/medically assisted suicide.

    The cruelty to force people to stay alive while slowly dying and suffering with terminal diseases is horrible. It’s traumatic for everyone involved, and it’s pointless.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    30 days ago

    Jaywalking
    Giving water to voters standing in line
    Punching nazis in the fucking face

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        Some banana republic? Or a country like Switzerland that’s probably missing from the list, but not because there aren’t any banned books?

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          Not a banana republic. And we simply don’t ban books. Like, some might be banned implicitly because of illegal content, for example a child porn book wouldn’t really fly here, but that’s because of the content, book itself wouldn’t be banned, you would just go to prison for sharing child pornography. I assume I could find other illegal content that would result in an implicit ban.

          But there’s no government body that even can create a list of books that should be banned. Hopefully it stays that way.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            You’re right. Looking at the list again, there are a lot of countries missing. Like Finland, which vaionko mentioned and several others from all kinds of continents. But I think what you said also applies to a lot of other democratic and free countries in the list. For example if I look at the list of Germany, where I’m from… That mainly lists books that include holocaust denial (which is a crime here, due to history) or other misinformation concerning that. And instructional books on how to build bombs or poison someone. So it’s not like our courts are banning books without a proper reason, either. And I think it mainly concerns distributing and selling those books. Owning them is fine, with more or less the one exception of child pornography.

            And it’s not the government’s job to ban books here, either. These are some individual(?) court rulings.

            But with that said, my country isn’t at the top of freedom of speech. I think we’re cutting down on libel and defamation more than some other countries. And sometimes an author or publisher gets sued for publishing a book containing doxxing or lots of personal information abot celebrities/polititians without their consent. And then that’s effectively banned from being distributed.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    For now all I can think of are drugs (every single one, including opioids) and euthanasia (not just for terminal diseases, should be available for everyone who decides to).

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      With limits

      Fentanyl, for example, should require doctors guidance at least, and forced medical help to get off of it when you’re displaying addiction behavior.

      Euthanasia should also be legal, but with strict rules. You want to avoid someone off themselves just because they’re having a bad day