• FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Kind of fucked up but tbf Google does similarly shady stuff.

    Please just use duckduckgo (or SearX).

    • Gregor@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      I host my own SearXNG instance, which miiiight be a bit of a bad idea because the anonymity of the crowd disappears but hosting your own services is way too cool to ignore. It’s at search.gregtech.eu in case anyone wants to use it.

      • nef@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is nothing like GregTech! Where’s the tedious microcrafting to enjoy before every search?

      • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hahha GregSearX I love it!

        I’ve used searX in the past and found it was decent but personally I am going to stick with duckduckgo because it just works better for my needs (especially since I’m on mobile).

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        What I don’t like about SearXNG (aside of no favicons/icons I think) is that it doesn’t show the content of what I am looking for in the browser desktop tabs, if I search for “Linux” in the tab it is only shown “SearXNG” instead of what I am searching for… That definitely kills my browsing habits… I hope I am being clear (can’t post a screenshot right now), also unsure if it was the same with mobile browsers.

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can control that with a setting. In Settings - Privacy, turn on “Query in the page’s title.”

          My instance has a magnifying glass as the favicon.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Thank you, I didn’t even know it was possible.

            I am gonna try it later, happy spying /j

            • Gregor@gregtech.eu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              There we go, I have the favicons set up. Sorry for the intermittent downtime, I was doing some configuration.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Thanks for the heads up, always a good thing being proved wrong when asking for features :p

      • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        3 days ago

        And Searx is the same. And startpage is just google.

        But the point is they don’t track.

    • vinyl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would use anything else before DDG, the primary function of it which is searching, generally feels sucky

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    User: “Can we get Google?”

    Microsoft: “But we already have Google at home!”

    The Google at home: [reskinned Bing page]

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is a genius move to keep you from Google search

    Seems more like a genius move to get slapped with another antitrust-like lawsuit.

    • Feelfold@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Corps don’t give a fuck about an antitrust law suit. In the US, the party that pays the most to jerk off CEOs just got put in charge. Even if it was the other party, who only pays slightly less, the most extreme fines are a slap on the wrist. Hell, come Jam 20th it’ll probably a tax write off.

      Until the EU levies fines that would kneecap these companies out of business, there is no incentive to change the behavior.

    • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I mean the original lawsuit was for aggressively bundling Internet Explorer and kneecapping other browsers. Which sure sounds a lot like a minor variation on what they’ve been doing with Edge and Bing for a while now, without consequences. Antitrust enforcement is not something I have a lot of confidence in for the foreseeable future.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    And just when I thought their endless begging couldn’t get any more pathetic.
    Soon enough they’ll tell you a puppy dies every time you launch a non-edge browser

  • seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a search engine showing open evidence of skewing results away from true for their own motivations. Slightly comic when it is Microsoft doing it to Google but if they do this so blatantly how else are they more subtly redirecting our searches towards biased or even false results that benefit them and misinform the user.

  • BangCrash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    The single thing Google did right when they first came out was a clean UI with a search bar on an uncluttered page.

    At the time the competitors had search pages cluttered with ads and news. It was so bad you couldn’t think.

    If Microsoft makes their search nice to look at them it’s going to get many more users

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Besides Privacy DDG is wayy better then Google And Bing + It has a better search quality.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I prefer DDG to either as well, but in terms of search quality … Don’t they use Bing search results?

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes they use Bing but i think they did some adjustments to improve the search quality (Correct me if am wrong)

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think there’s a difference in search quality, but I do really like the bangs and the client-side settings (can completely disable the AI noise, enable dark mode, etc all w/o needing an account).

      • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Make sure you have regional results enabled if you’re not from the US, results get way better (just make sure the little toggle right below the search bar is on)

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It shows less results but i find it to be better personally.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think Kagi is way better, but unluckily it’s a paid product. Most of the people will never pay for a search engine.

  • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Microsoft is a pathetic little husk of a company, what a corny and predatory practice that not even google cares to do if you search other search engines.

  • Rinox@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait, is Microsoft using Google’s copyrighted work on their page without authorization? This is going to get pulled so fast they’re gonna get whiplash.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why would they? They can imitate Google’s style w/o violating their copyright, it would actually be easier to reinvent the wheel than to try to somehow copy what Google has. It’s nothing special, just a bit of padding and margin settings for result cards and whatnot.