• psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven’t used intel since 2012.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Who wants to get in bed with Elon so he drives the brand into the ground? How much has Fidelity written down their investment in Twitter, 80%?

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I appreciate him doing this after intel lost their magic, otherwise, it would have been much harder emotionally.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They lost it in CPUs, but I think they’re actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Eh unless they have the most efficient overall, they won’t make inroads into the server market. The entry level laptop and desktop markets are getting smaller and has less margins.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They have what, 2 models? And in the GPU market, they aren’t even a pimple on the fly on the ass of nVidia or AMD

        • Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’ve personally seen on at least 5 different Intel models on store shelves. The A380, A580 and the A750. Now the B580 and B570. The A380 stuck around but the others sold out fast from what I saw.

          And though they aren’t nearly as large as the two giants, they seem to be aiming for and pleasing the under-served sub-$250 market. Though I wish they’d publish more official numbers. A 6 day slice from a retailer isn’t a great view on trends.

  • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 hours ago

    He’s going to rename the i series to something ridiculous like i69, i420, i1337, and iX isn’t he?

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      x86 is already dead yo

      edit: downvoters don’t understand they are using amd64 and not x86 lol wtf

      • ralakus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 minutes ago

        x86 is the architecture, amd64 is an extention on that architecture so it’s still x86 just with an instruction set extension that allows for native 64 bit computing.

        x86 was designed to be nearly fully backwards compatible back to the i386 or even the 8086 so whatever code that could run on those CPUs would work on modern “amd64” CPUs.

        Pretty much x86 is a snowball rolling down a hill. It keeps picking up new things and growing as time goes on but the core of it will always be the same.

      • 4grams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        good point. It still makes me smile how that one went down. imagine if we were all on f’ing itanium instead.

        • sepi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          What are you smoking? x86 has been gone for years. Y’all are using amd64.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You don’t need to buy an entire company to control or profit from it… He’s really that dumb isn’t he. He could do the whole Black Rock thing and control every company in the world, instead he has this idea of just owning everything.

    I’m starting to suspect the price speculation of things he owns is by his own hand, nothing to do with the market whatsoever.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Responsible to who?
      Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

      Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.

      That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

      Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
      And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah.

        And there’s a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

        Source: Rockefeller’s biography.

        And that’s actually the optimistic version, from Elon’s perspective. There’s been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn’t have to worry about the courts.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Not doing to happen in this political climate. The robber barons has nothing in the tech companies.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I mean really depends whether or not he manages to continue to succesfully own the US government. He made basically statements along the lines of if trump loses the election he could go to jail. I assume he’s betting on either the trump administration killing democracy… or being able to buy the next election too. Or perhaps just often enough that the supreme court never gets fixed.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Yeah. Rockefeller pretty much owned the government in his heyday, too.

            And then at some point he didn’t anymore. Money can buy power, but it does run out eventually.

            Rockefeller was a lot smarter than Musk, and got a bit ahead of it with publicity stunt donations, before his influence ran out.

            Musk thinks he can achieve a better outcome by controlling the media or the courts.

            I think it’s objectively true that controlling the media does work, but I also think Musk wildly overestimates his own competence, and is in for a worse time than Rockefeller had.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      He hasn’t bought it yet, maybe everyone else will stay buying Intel stocks after this news and it’ll get too expensive for him.