I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I once had to use the NY State government website for info. Finally found the page. Open page up and see a blue background with dark blue font. Un fucking readable.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    DHL.

    Website designed by hateful people who seem to make it as hard as possible to pay duty fees on parcels.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 days ago

    Pintrest is the worst website ever built and has caused immense damage to the free sharing of information.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      I legitimately don’t know why Google hasn’t filtered it out of image search results. It’s harmful to Google’s platform.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s the top rated blocked website on Kagi.

        I don’t know why Google doesn’t take a hint.

    • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      me: oh hey I was looking for–

      Pinterest: Sign in or I will come to your house and break your thumbs

      me: well fuck you too then

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Used to be an easy way to collect and share photos or something from a website with friends. It was especially useful with things like making a collection of fashion that you liked and then discussing similar fashions with friends. It actually at one point would recognize some pieces of clothing and then create links to buy it. Actually a useful advertising kind of thing IMHO. But it became bloated and full of tracking nonsense rather than helping people share things and so it lost its usefulness. It seems it’s mostly populated by bots now to drive SEO.

    • anothermember@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only way I’ve worked out how to even save Instagram images locally is using the page information (ctrl+i) Media tab in Firefox and sort through it to find it there. Terrible for an image hosting website.

      • hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s not an image hosting site, it’s a social media site whose goal is to keep you coming back for more. The easier it is for you to save their content locally, the less likely you are to spend as much time on their site.

          • hogmomma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            If you’re running Windows, though, you can use the Snipping Tool to grab the part of the screen you want to save, which may or may not have an image in it.

              • lad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better

                • elephantium@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I don’t think so. I’ve been using PrintScr longer than the snipping tool has existed.

                  I’m not sure what “saving from source” would be for a screenshot. What do you mean there?

  • I thought Twitter was a stupid idea when it first started. 140 character limit? What the fuck is the point? The fact they increased that limit shows it was dumb. Everything else about the site just gives further reason to hate it.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 days ago

      That limit came from the days of SMS. The idea was that you can’t go to the internet, because data is expensive, the network doesn’t exist, your dumb phone can’t even open websites etc. However, you can send SMS messages, and those things have a 160 character limit.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Do does that mean they took an existing limitation from the SMS protocol, that didn’t apply because it used data instead and then shoehorned it into a godawful web 2.0 monstrosity all the same (and bear in mind, this is significantly reducing the unnecessary character limit!)

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 days ago

          In 2006 the restriction did apply. The idea was that you would type the message on a computer, and let Twitter send a few SMS messages to a small group people.

          You weren’t supposed to have millions of followers or write a full length blog post using a hundred short messages. The idea was that you cold reach people quickly even though they didn’t have access to a proper computer or the internet. So much has changed in the past 18 years…

            • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              8 days ago

              Back in the bad old days, messages cost you real world money. If you wanted to reach lots of people by SMS, it would be pretty expensive. Might as well let Twitter pay for the messages, especially when you’re just writing a public announcement.

                • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I’ve heard some strange stories about a mysterious land on the other side of a vast ocean. In this far-away land of countless wonders, companies are only symbolically restricted by laws. This means that they can legally exploit their employees and customers in all sorts of creative ways, and charge pretty much whatever they want. Maybe you’ve heard similar wonderful tales as well?

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    How are we measuring?

    • Global harmful impact: it’s hard to beat Facebook
    • Disgusting: long ago, I got a spam advertising a dedicated CSAM site. I looked to see it it was really what it said, and sent it to NCMEC when I saw that is was
    • Actively malign: 8chan is up there, as are old fashioned hate groups.
    • Gregor@gregtech.euOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      I kinda meant horrible design, but I guess these categories are good measurements too

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Unfortunately people always go on the “shock site” boards like /b/ and /pol/ instead of checking out the more niche ones like /po/ (papercraft and origami) and /tg/ (traditional games) which are much more like regular hobbyist forums/image boards. I can see why one awful experience would sour the whole thing though and some of the people who post there are sad excuses for human beings.

      Edit: Just as an example this is the oldest thread on 4chan at the moment. It was created in 2016 and is still active. It catalogues OP’s struggle to make an origami clock.

    • Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Can’t stand the staleness. Apart from the frigging bots and automods, it feels like a bunch of boring, shallow, sated establishment guys that like “pretending that one could be hip with a mortgage payment,” as Bela Koe-Krompecher once put it.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Ogrish.

    Doesn’t exist any more, but definitely traumatized me as a child.

    If you haven’t heard of it, it was basically a video hosting site focusing on extreme violence and gore.

    Tons of clips of people being killed or horrifically maimed in war, car accidents, industrial accidents, ‘extreme’ magic shows gone wrong, brutal gang attacks, straight up snuff videos…

    Some videos off the top of my head I won’t ever be able to erase from my memory:

    The beheading of Daniel Pearl.

    Low resolution video of 9/11, but you could make out people jumping from the towers… and splattering all over the ground. The camera man tracked people the entire distance they fell.

    Some insane magic show gone wrong where a man chain sawed his wife in half … she hadn’t managed to fold herself into the right position inside the magic box… her screams and twitching legs were not an act.

    A video taken in Fallujah (I think?) of an Iraqi hopped up on an absurd amount of drugs, taken from a US soldier who had just dismounted with most of his squad from a humvee.

    Him and others advance down the middle of a street towards the soldiers, all holding AKs. A volley of fire from the dismounted soildiers either took out all the group, leaving them with chunks blown off, writhing in agony, or scattering…

    Except this one guy. He’s clearly seriously wounded, but is still advancing basically blind firing his AK.

    The US soldiers are in shock that he’s still walking.

    Now for a burst from a 50 cal.

    Huge parts of this guy’s body are visibly blown off of him, but he still advances.

    A second, more sustained 50 cal burst basically liquifies him where he stood.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      How do you even land there?

      I only know 4chan through comments, I wouldn’t even bother looking for another site like that lol.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        4chan wasn’t even the first, it was an English version of a japanese site (futaba channel) which was an image board version of a forum (2channel).

        Back in the late aughts, there were a ton of *chan sites. Some even more unsavory than 4chan.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

    I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

    Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.