Summary

Teen drug, alcohol, and tobacco use in the U.S. continues to decline, with record-low usage levels reported in 2023, according to the University of Michigan’s Monitoring the Future survey.

Among 12th graders, 66% reported no recent use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, while 80% of 10th graders and 90% of 8th graders avoided these substances entirely.

Experts attribute the decline partly to reduced peer pressure during the pandemic.

However, nicotine pouch use has doubled among 12th graders, raising concerns.

Despite pop culture’s glamorization of smoking, teen cigarette use remains low.

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Nah, here’s the real reason. When I was the nightclubbing age, you could get a bottle of booze, 6 cans of coke and mineral water for like $50. Last time I went to a club, I paid $120 for the same thing. People in the 18-25 age range don’t have $120 to drop every Friday.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You also have to give credit to youngins these days that they are smart enough to spend money by going to gym and choosing to live a healthier lifestyle instead. This is according to many news report.

      And also, I think the rise of social media is to be credited as well because instead of going out to socialise, the younger generation are socialising digitally. Of course social media has its drawbacks, which is getting highlighted more in recent years for understandable reasons, but it also has an upside and really it offers many alternatives that traditions couldn’t. I know us older folks begrudge social media, but hey, it’s here to stay. For better or worse.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It’s probably my choice of gym but I see almost no young people in it. It’s mostly 30-somethings that figured out that eating garbage all the time and staying thin stops at 30. Yes, that includes me.

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Worth noting that school age kids have a vastly different free times than most of us. I often see the same group you’re talking about at the gym, but if I show up right after 5 I see a bunch of high schoolers. They must like to go just after school.

  • Lenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I quit smoking a long time ago after many attempts. The key was to simply get poor enough that I simply couldn’t afford it. Perhaps that’s what we’re seeing here.

  • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whenever I see one of these polls being published I imagine how I would have answered them when I was that age, and I would have lied about every negative seeming question.

    What if the poll wasn’t really anonymous and this data was going to be passed on to future employers or schools?

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Interesting idea but they are comparing different year surveys with the same age children.

      Do you think that kids are more prone to lying now, than earlier years?

      • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’d wager that teenagers these day are much more aware of data collection and more protective of personal information then they were 10-20 years ago. I could be giving them too much credit, though.

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Possibly? Could correspond with increased digital surveillance. Most people understand that nothing is private anymore.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Not only that but back then you didn’t have to worry about it with a simple rule:

          They ask you a question, do they know your name or who you are? No? It’s anonymous.

          Now you don’t have that anymore. Anything can be linked backed to you cause there is always a digital finger print.

          Even if you ask random people on the street, there is facial recognition and cameras everywhere.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ll offer this as a possible reason: Kids don’t solo travel like they used to. Kids not wanting driver’s licenses as much is a thing.

    I think I can speak for older generations a little - we couldn’t wait to get enough independence to have a bike or driver’s license to get out of the house. There was only the telephone to talk to people - as in no internet, no social media, not everyone had computer games or consoles. Eventually you had messaging services like AIM or IRC, but you didn’t really meet up with friends on them because not everyone had PCs, or cared to learn how to use one. There was cable TV if you were lucky, but you didn’t watch that all day. We went from one friend’s house to another, or friends of friend’s homes. You got exposed to a lot more living conditions, often while completely unsupervised. Bored kids or kids with home problems didn’t mind pilfering the alcohol from the parents, or got whatever drug they could. Usually pot. Nothing else to do. Plus some peer pressure.

    Now? Kids text. They meet up online on discord or whatever VoIP or messaging service is cool right now. Group chats. Play online games. They don’t need to leave the house to hang out, and in-person hangouts seem way less important to my kids than it ever was to me when I was younger. That’s a lot less opportunity to be introduced to alcohol or other drugs and have the access to them.

    So maybe less peer pressure isn’t necessarily a Covid result, it’s the result of social interaction moving to online spaces and not physical spaces where access to alcohol or other drugs are present.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This is a big part of it for sure. I have a 21 year old nephew who refuses to get his license. He just says yeah I’ve got lots of friends that drive me where I need to go. It’s not always going to be like that, kid.

      I got my learner’s permit the day I turned 15 and my license the day I turned 16. Couldn’t wait to get away from my family.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are also more poor in general.

      Wages have been stagnating for over 50 years.

      Independence requires financial independence.

      It’s not possible to meaningfully participate in society without disposable income.

      This leads to the avg person having less power and influence than almost any of their ancestors.

      Unfortunately nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    But what if our teenagers all grow up to be lame?

    The coolness gap is real.

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously, my teenage niece is a complete square, but still looks up to me as her cool uncle, so I encourage her straight laced nerdiness.

      Hopefully she doesn’t burn out in her 20s and make a series of painful but cool mistakes like I did.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is why it’s important for teenagers to make their coolest mistakes early on in life while there are fewer consequences.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This is why I’m so annoyed at college “police services” and serious crackdowns on protests. WTF, college, this is not what I pay you for. I pay you to be a sandbox where little Johnny can grow and develop and find his voice. Yes, also suffer consequences for his mistakes, but non-serious consequences. Your job is to better prepare him for life, not ruin his life.

          My own effing Alma mater glorified building takeovers from the 1960s, talking about the good changes that eventually developed, but then they changed from being a “security” force trying to protect the kids to a “police” force so they can carry guns and arrest kids. Then during the BLM demonstrations they started arresting kids and kicking them out. WTF.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Seriously. The rule should be, “occupy whatever the hell you want. Just don’t create a fire hazard or prevent people from doing their job.” Want to sit-in on the hallway outside the university president’s office? Fine. Just keep the number small enough to not be a fire hazard. Feel free to shout whatever you want at them while they walk to their door. Don’t do anything stupid like chaining yourself to the university president, and you’ll be fine.

            Yeah, it would be a bit annoying to be that president and to have to walk past protesters during terms. But so what? You signed up to be the president of the university, the human face of the campus administration. You’re the highest paid person on campus, behind only the football coach. Don’t want to deal with blue haired teenagers shouting at you? Don’t sign up to be a university president!

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Maybe smartphones and social media are a problem here. Running around buttnaked with penises drawn to you face isn’t that fun anymore, if everyone can take a picture/video that might haunt you for decades. It’s self-surveillance.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the one hand, cigarettes are bad and everyone should quit. And alcohol should be used in moderation. And many drugs are very dangerous and addictive and should be avoided. So this is probably good.

    On the other hand, if this means are just sitting home alone, maybe having parasocial relationships with influencers, that’s sad.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Teenagers going out to party - bad

      Teenagers sitting at home - also bad.

      What the hell are kids supposed to do? Just not exist from the period where we stop finding them cute till adulthood?

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Going out to party isn’t bad. Sitting at home using drugs and alcohol compulsively because you are addicted is bad. It’s a fine line to walk but lots of people do it. I did every drug under the sun as a youth and turned out fine, and this applies to pretty much my entire university cohort. Not a single one of them ended up as a junkie.

        Should we encourage kids to drink and do drugs? I don’t know tbh. That experience was genuinely positive for me because it gets me out there in the world, made me friends and memories and taught me lessons about moderation. From my point of view the people who ended up getting the shit end of the stick were the handful of people I know who got addicted to WoW and online gambling, not the one who did drugs on occasion. But apparently those things are becoming common and culturally acceptable while partying isn’t. Take that as you will.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          For my kid who is very athletic, I always phrased it as “don’t destroy your cardio by inhaling any ashes or burning stuff”

          But he is so strait laced and so careful with his health that it’s not really an issue.

          My other kid is a different story. Luckily he doesn’t like the smell of cigarettes or pot smoke, but I found out his vice when he offered me a gummy. First: cool, second: shit, I was supposed to yell at you

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Sports, Music, Hobbies like board games, Outdoor activities like camping and hiking.

        There is plenty of fulfilling things to do together that dont involve alcohol or other drugs or “partying” in the sense of loud music, bad hookups and regrettable videos the next day.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why do you single out alcohol as “should be used in moderation”? It’s literally a hard drug and way worse than cigarettes.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Does “hard drug” have an agreed upon definition?

        I’m pretty sure cigarettes are worse. Much more addictive, harmful to the user and nearby people, and the cigarette butts I think are an environmental hazard.

        Alcohol use is as old as human civilization. I don’t think light usage is that hazardous.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There you go.

          TLDR: Alcohol is a psychoactive, addictive carcinogen that will give you cancer no matter the consumption (though of course the more you drink the worse it becomes). It’ll also fuck up your liver, but that’s not mentioned in this article as it focuses on cancer.

          That aside, where did you get that cigarettes are more addictive than alcohol? Only one of these will literally kill you if you quit cold turkey unprepared and it’s not cigarettes.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Most people I’ve known who smoke are addicted. They get moody and other withdrawal symptoms. No one I know has a similar relationship with alcohol. This is not a scientific study, but that’s been my experience. I know there are alcoholics in the world.

            Also nicotine and cigarettes are known to be addictive https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/tobacco-nicotine-e-cigarettes/nicotine-addictive

            I’m pretty sure “stopping drinking cold turkey will kill you” is kind of hyperbolic. Most people aren’t drinking that heavily. This thread started on the point of moderate drinking.

            I acknowledge that even light drinking is unsafe. I wasn’t aware it that plausibly that hazardous. Unfortunately, many things are unsafe and I don’t think alcohol is going away any time soon. Going out for a drink with friends, there’s probably a bunch of hazards there. Unhealthy foods, car exhaust, staying up late.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of course better education and all that stuff becoming super expensive makes it much less desirable.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m 41, and my cousin has young teens. I asked “Do kids today even play video games?”

      And she said “Not in the way you would think. It’s not about playstation or nintendo. It’s about cell phones and tablets.”

      Which made me sad. App gaming is laaaaaame.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I hope that’s just your experience - being relegated to mobile games would be sad. I mean I’m addicted too but I recognize they’re just a time and attention waster.

        My older teens are pretty avid gamers as are their friends. One of them started a gaming club at his school! They’re such great kids they sometimes let their Mom or me join a party, and they don’t laugh too hard. But seriously, that’s how they socialize ever since COViD. They’ll spend the entire night in a group chat, listening to music, sometimes teaming up sometimes not, just playing video games and spending time with friends. It works

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So bad. It can’t be very good for developing brains either… Video games can be great for developing things like motor functioning and abstract reasoning, and so much of that is lost with the mindlessness of mobile gaming.

        • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This must be why “there’s an app for that” is a phrase that’s been around forever and has nothing to do with the proliferation of mobile devices, i.e. iPhone.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering the article specifies that drugs, alcohol, and tobacco are “social” activities, I think this makes sense. It’s not good that kids are shifting to solitary activities

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gaming is very much a social activity.

        Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer.

        It hasnt been until indie games have really caught on, perhaps as a result of the shift towards open world multiplayer gaming that now dominates, that there is still a market for those types of games.

        I know multiple married people that used gaming to connect with each other when they had to be apart.

        I was actually on one of those married couples first date because they played league of legends, and that was how I even knew them.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer

          What? In 2024 alone, would you say games like Alan Wake 2, Baldurs Gate 3 or Elden Ring are “heavily designed around multiplayer”?

          Sure you have your FIFA’s and CoD and a bunch of other MP games, but single player games are still a thing.

          • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            And honestly, my understanding is that the multiplayer games aren’t very social: they’re almost always using ranked but otherwise random matchmaker settings that mean instead of socializing and getting to know people, you meet your single serving friends and then barely ever see them again.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Depends on the game… I used to play Overwatch, years ago, with a handful of friends regularly, and it was most certainly a social experience.

        • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s solitary social activity. Going out and seeing real people can’t be compared to a night gaming. The fact that people don’t see each other is actually a very bad thing because it could be a sign of greater depression and loneliness

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sorry but that’s like saying social media isnt a social activity. Yes there is s variety of ways to engage with it, but it is something that is causing people to connect with others from a distance.

            Its also like saying long distance relationships arent real relationships which would be a ridiculous thing to claim

            • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I believe social media isn’t a social activity because you are laying down on your bed typing on your phone chasing likes and replies. And also comparing a long distance relationship to an in-person one is ridiculous. They are completely different because you are not talking to a person, you are talking to a screen. There is absolutely no comparison to be made between online social activities and real life ones. Talking or gaming online is absolutely different from going out with friends at a chalet for a weekend and it’s a ridiculous thing to say they are similar

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                We are at an en passe then as we have fundamentally different perspectives on socializing

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thats one example, my point is only that there arent many titles, not that they dont exist

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah as much as this is good news, I think it’s just a sign of changes that have come in the digital age. Young people go out less in general, because their social life is all online. This is probably safer for them at the end of the day - less driving and less access to substances through friends. But still… the fact that young people are glued to their screens all the time is disturbing. Their lives may be longer, but what is the point of living when all you do is sit inside and consume social media?