A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its power output. The concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet’s resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star’s energy emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far more energy.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I believe they were making a joke because if you wrap this thing around a star there really is no day night cycle because it’s all star. Our day night cycle comes because we are spinning.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think freeman Dyson beat em to the punch by several decades :)

        The game is truly great though.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Some TIL posts really surprise you, it’s crazy to me that you have never heard about this. Not being degrading or anything like that, it’s just surprising.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    Be carful with those. You may block the light of constellation aliens use and really piss then off.

    • cewren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      While the idea is charming, a Dyson sphere itself would still consist of matter and as such it would emit radiation according to its temperature (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation). And since it surrounds a star it is heated from the inside and would definitely emit radiation that can be detected. Dark Matter is missing this radiation part and is only observed by its gravitation.

      So the answer is no, unfortunately.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Edit to add disclaimer: this is shitpost level math here guys, I’m just spitballing.

        It would definitely emit thermal radiation. if it was 99% efficient and the size of pluto’s orbit, around a star like the sun, and the energy was used to create matter, I think it would radiate the remaining energy as 0.009 W/m2 with a peak emission wavelength of 150micrometers. The James Webb telescope has infrared capabilities that max out at 28.5 micrometers so def not detectable.

        But probably a dyson sphere would be smaller than pluto’s orbit, which would greatly increase the apparent power, and shorten the wavelength. idk it’s all imaginary.

        I won’t subject you to my hand writing but I did (power of sun × 0.01)/(surface area of sphere with Pluto’s orbital radius) to get radiation intensity (0.009 W/m2). Then rearranged Stefan-Boltzmann law to solve for temperature (19.8K). Then used Wien’s Displacement Law to calculate the peak wavelength (1.5×10-4 m).

        Maybe I’ll run the numbers again with a martian orbit radius, and 50% efficiency.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Okay I did the same calculation but with Martian orbit as dyson sphere size, and 50% efficiency I got a wavelength of 3.4um so nicely in the infrared range of JWST.

          I think the sphere would need to be like 99.95% efficient to be undetectable by JWST at Martian orbit radius.

    • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      My initial reaction: “What? No.”

      After thinking a little bit: “hmm I guess you could say that…”

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Like I’m sure it’s not but I don’t know if it’s a worse explanation than any of the other ideas being considered. But I don’t know enough to even know how wrong I am.

  • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t remember the math, but you lose return on investment after a certain percentage of coverage.

    Dyson Grids are the future!!! 😜

    • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The other “benefit” to the sphere is blacking out a star. Other life, should it exist, is less likely to find the structure. ITT people destroying my dreams of a big shelly boi

      • Bimfred@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I would think it’d make it more likely that you’re discovered when you turn your star into a black ball with a gigantic IR signature where a star should be. Any civilization with a cursory understanding of gravity and stellar spectra would turn every telescope they have on you.

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          What does IR red shift into over cosmic distances? But it would be just as, if not less, noticeable as a star suddenly dimming to [100%-optimal capture rate]

          • Bimfred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Deeper IR, microwave and radio. Within a galaxy, redshift can be ignored. In another galaxy, the issue is moot, you don’t need to worry about them and they don’t need to worry about you.

            Our current scopes can pick up brown dwarfs with a surface temperature below freezing. An object the diameter of a planetary orbit, with the gravitational effect of a main sequence star and giving off just black body radiation is gonna stick out like a neon “Interesting stuff here!” sign the moment someone does a long wavelength survey of your general region.

            Even if you build a swarm instead of a solid shell, you’re still going to shift the star’s apparent spectrum towards IR, from the swarm radiating waste heat. A star whose mass, diameter and emission spectrum don’t match up with the math is inviting investigation, regardless of how you try to mask what you’ve been doing.

          • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            The gravity from the star will also still be there regardless of how much of its EM signature is visible outside of the sphere.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or DYson Bubbles, which would also “cover” enough “surface” to be viable without needing god knows how many planets’ worth of material

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    You need to watch more Star Trek, friend.

    Specifically “The Next Generation”, Season 6, Episode 4, " Relics".

    Thank me later. 😁

  • batcheck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Came here to say that if you like this concept, Peter Hamilton has a book series called Commonwealth Saga in the science fiction category that is excellent. Lots of pseudoscience from early 2000s in that series.