• db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is too many won’t go for it. I recently met a guy who completely voted against his own best interests just because Kamala was born with a vagina instead of a penis. He admitted it freely, so he knowingly voted for the people who want to make people like him slaves again. It’s absolutely mind boggling.

    • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not against the idea at all, but there are pletny of women in power at the federal level that are absolute dogshit as well.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, merit is overrated. We should just get more of Giorgia Meloni, Alice Weidel and Marine Le Pen. Clearly Europe is on the right track…

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Have you not seen tumblr? You’ll just get Elon Musk with a vagina and a hate-on for anyone capable of having a hard-on… Even if they aren’t men.

      So an even more mask-off JK Rowling

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Statistically, women leaders start more wars than men, so a matriarchal society signs us up for more war. The group statistically likely to start less wars is former soldiers, probably because they know the horrors.

      Maybe leadership is more “content of character” than a gender issue

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know about that. If I recall that woman got busted for hiding men at her place. They knew because the toilet seats were left up!

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s next? Rename the Artemis program because we can’t be flying to the moon under some lady name? Probably change it to Ares, god of war and courage. That’s a very manly man name, just as the good lords Jesus and Trump intended.

  • Wutchilli@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    Where can i read them now? Did anybody downloaded those comics and is willing to share them?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Keith’s 23 March update: within a few hours after this was posted (over a weekend) A NASA YouTube video and an official NASA photo of two female astronauts were pulled offline. Both things had been online for several years. This is not the first time this has happened. Apparently NASA DEI Sanitation Squad is using my postings to help them delete things. Details below.

      So has anybody saved the YouTube video?

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        yeah, it’s right in that same article.

        looks like that’s the “details below” part of that paragraph.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      All of them. Afraid of giving anyone an equal playing field, straight afraid of women. Hold everyone down, insecure little men.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I actually think that’s their preferred method of abortion. That way they can really get out all the anger in one go.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    NASA is going down the drain under the new regime. If you’re interested in space exploration, shift your gaze over to the ESA or CNSA.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same thing that was always going to happen to it: It’s not gonna fly. It’s been canceled or clean sheet restarted at least once by every administration since inception, and frankly that rope has been pretty thoroughly pissed up.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Gods dammit, and after Artemis I was so succesful! I was looking forward to Artemis II… And seeing humans once again on the moon in my lifetime.

          I won’t get it. Mars is, resource poor. Don’t get me wrong; having humanity set foot on another planet would be an amazing achievement, but… Since everything is so profit-driven, why not support a return to the moon!?

          There’s potentially Helium 3 up there. And the moon has a bunch of surface-minerals.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Artemis program never had any legs. The entire thing was being done in the most stupid way possible simply so that NASA could use SLS, a rocket that was completely incapable of actually fulfilling it stated mission. It was like the Apollo missions but without the lander.

  • Ronno@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m curious: the USA wants to dominate the final frontier, how will they ensure a civilization can thrive without woman in those new settlements?

    Anyways, the idea is horrific and stupid, let’s hope the US implodes.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The far right morons and the cowards enabling them are fucking things up for its own sake. They’re not thinking ahead. They’re not actually even thinking, they’re just reacting to imaginary shit.

      They aren’t the USA, they’re the parasites the USA is infected with.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        they’re the parasites

        They’re the elected parasites… that should tell you a bit about who voted.

      • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are half of the USA at least, the other half are mostly dems, I have zero sympathy for them.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Cool, cool… so you’re better than literally everybody. Right on.

          • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            You deliberately choose to ignore the word ‘mostly’ to deny the tiny true left in your banana republic’s otherwise awful political spectrum.
            But you couldn’t make that nasty remark otherwise could you?
            Am I better than the people complicit in genocide and plenty more despicable things? Absolutely.
            It’s not that hard.
            If only you people would have some minimum humanitarian standards you wouldn’t need to vent your frustration for deservedly losing.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      With bottling Embryos like in Brave New World probably. That sounds about weird enough for Musk and his fellow band of shitheads

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Musk doesn’t even have sex physically. Almost all his kids were made by surgically impregnating the women coerced into having his kids.

        • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          At least not to reproduce. Afaik he once said that he prefers IVF because it allows the parents to have influence on some of the steps. His daughter recently claimed that Musk wants to decide over his offsprings sex through selective IVF.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I always remember the question for Bill Gates were someone asked him if the Middle East will ever catch up with the rest of the world technology wise. And his answer was basically “no” because you shut out half of your population, holding women down.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They don’t want no women, they want subservient women. Think Handmaid’s Tale in space.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, I’m curious if they’re just bowing to trump in extreme desperation to keep federal funding, otherwise they’re out of a job? Or, do they have some maga right wingers in leadership at NASA?

    My guess and hope is the former. If true, maybe they have to come off as spineless just to keep being funded. I dunno, just speculating.

    • Waldelfe@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      My guess is a bit of both. As a woman who’s spent some time working in IT, there are still more than enough men who are pissed at having to include women and would jump at the opportunity to get them out of the door or degrade them as soon as possible. Give them an opportunity like “Oh no, now we have to take those women-related things down. Just in case, gotta keep our funding. Too bad, so sad.” and they’ll jump on it.

  • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    NASA is always, and in the first place a military organisation in service of the US regime.

  • rouxdoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Don’t worry, worry-worts. There is an armada of data hoarders who will bring this all back after the purge. Data doesn’t die as long as nerds and geeks like me exist to persist the knowledge we have attained. Be of good cheer - nobody viewed that data before except a select few who cared, it is still there for them just not officially hosted by our broken system…it will be unbroken soon enough.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reaction: mixed.

    Why: fruit of a poisoned tree.

    Elaboration: you want art promoting good things to be sincere, because if it’s not sincere, then it’s not promoting anything, like Disney’s “kinda diversity-aimed” actions toward Star Wars ; art is sincere when it’s not pushed ; when something is promoted by an agency, it’s pushed, even if those making decisions and those making said art share the idea, the former give the latter an order and make it their job.

    Context\apology: I think the same about Soviet propaganda art, it may be promoting something good sometimes, but that effect of hierarchy can be felt ; or a few recent movies made about the Armenian Genocide, all intended as a political message about, well, leaving said process unfinished and thus are not interesting as art ; or about FOSS propaganda with almost no effect, if someone remembers those videos about Linux Mint and those FOSS bloggers like Nixie Pixel, that kinda stuff.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Which specifically would that be? Surely you can explain that if you can evaluate my “agenda” as ugly.

        Maybe what I wrote meant literally what I wrote. That an agenda is always ugly. People who want to fix the world via right kinds of propaganda seem to dislike that.