You must log in or register to comment.
It’s never safe to experiment with replicators. Just ask the asgard how that turns out.
Turns out they were after butt fat all along
The Assgard.
Is that why the asgard were so emaciated? They modified their clones to have a complete absence of butt fat?
It’s hard to get fat on those little sustenance cubes
I like the yellow ones 🟨
Grey goo is a fun idea but doesn’t really work.
Radiation would cause replication errors in the nanobots, eventually leading to speciation. Before you know it you just have an ecosystem again, with a whole food chain of butt eradicators and paperclip maximizers.
Butt Eradicators and Paperclip Maximisers
Sorry this will be my band name now
deleted by creator
Pretty sure nature does have checksums in some places. IIRC, there are some genetic sequences that are surprisingly resistant to mutation upon copying, but the same doesn’t apply to every sequence on account of, I assume, it being expensive in some way.
I am not sure what to search to find what I think I remember.
They would have to mutate in a way that would either overpower the original very quickly or in a way that they were unidentifiable.
Most likely though the original would recognize the mutation as an outsider and immediately terminate it.
a fellow universal paperclip enjoyer, i see
Grey goo also doesn’t work because it’d almost certainly use the same building blocks as life, and in a competition with life, life’s probably going to be the winner. Even if it didn’t, unless it’s doing weird cold fusion subatomic interactions (probably impossible) to make more of whatever element it’s composed of, it’ll just run out of food in whatever local environment it’s in.
I don’t think this is necessarily true. The reason DNA is so affected by radiation is because it’s malleable. It’s built out of chemical building blocks that fit like Lego. Gray goo would likely be similar to extremely complex proteins which replicate like a physical version of a quine.
Flipping an individual bit through radiation is extremely easy, which is why we need error corrections, but despite that, we still get errors… Even if the probability of an error bypassing the ECC is extremely low, over a long enough timescale it will happen often enough to evolve. Especially in space where there is no atmosphere or magnetic field to reduce it.
I’m not talking about little tiny robots with batteries and computers, I’m talking about precisely formed, microscopic and deformable chunks of metal. That’s why I brought up proteins- they do not carry any information themselves, and can sometimes form duplicates of themselves, such as in the case of prions.
IIRC the bigger issue is that the nanobots would end up just melting themselves, to avoid this they’d have to work a lot slower, probably at about the rate of a particularly fast acting bacteria.
Wait, it’s all butt fat?
Always ass been.
Logic checks out. The whole universe is ass.
We will simply stop climate change by programming nano robots to absorb carbon atoms from everything they touch. - Elon Musk, probably.
I saw this one, Bender turns all the water into alcohol, right?
When you forget to put break conditions for a loop…
Seems like it wouldn’t really matter who he tested it on.
Nanomachines decided the most effective way to remove butt fat is to replace it with the true vacuum
Reminds me of Blood Music by Greg Bear, good book!
What’s it called… Kasakov cascade, or something like that?
zzt
