If you’re in the US, you might see a new shaded section at the top of your Google Search results with a summary answering your inquiry, along with links for more information. That section, generated by Google’s generative AI technology, used to appear only if you’ve opted into the Search Generative Experience(SGE) in the Search Labs platform. Now, according to Search Engine Land, Google has started adding the experience on a “subset of queries, on a small percentage of search traffic in the US.” And that is why you could be getting Google’s experimental AI-generated section even if you haven’t switched it on.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Google Search was so good when it came out. Complete polar opposite to the cluttered and bloated Yahoo Search. Haven’t really using it for years now because the search results became worse and worse, especially when that rounded edge theme came along.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is useless in searching for new info, I mostly use it for searching for things I already know/seen, but don’t want to bother with URLs or bookmarks.

        Even then, I have to scroll to the middle of the page, to get to the actual results below all the sponsored crap.

  • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    All the talk about how much computing power and electricity AI uses, and then Google and Bing just run it for every (most? many? some?) search.

    • skooks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t it the training of the models which is the most energy intensive? whereas generating some text in answer to a question is probably not super intensive. Caveat: I know nothing

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes training is the most expensive but it’s still an additional trillion or so floating point operations per generated token of output. That’s not nothing computationally.

        • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just consider how long it takes GPT4 to answer a question. Anywhere from a few seconds to a minute in my experience. There’s at least one A100 at probably 400w going full throttle that whole time, plus all the supporting hardware.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ll be looking for a uBlockOrigin filter when it hits for me

    I try to avoid google search when I can, but this should solve the problem for the rest of the time

      • donio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wish that was the case but sadly most of them are basically Bing or Google frontends or belong to entities that I trust even less. As far as I can tell there are very few independent crawls out there.

          • donio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            SearXNG is great at what it does but it falls into the Bing/Google/etc-frontend category since it just forwards your query to one of the search engines it has modules for. It doesn’t have its own crawl and index.

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Kagi has been doing a decent job for me, with the downside that it’s paid, and does use results from other places.
          They go into detail about how they work, but it’s them paying for results from lots of engines, plus their own engine, then heavy duty filtering of the results.
          Plus a ML results summarizer you can press after searching.

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Normal search results are already littered with useless ai generated seo optimized crap. It’s got to the point where sometimes it’s quicker to learn the knowledge you seek the old fashion way: by reading books.

    Enshitification must lose.

    • bbuez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      🤓 Well you see actually we trained all our models off all historical text written by humans so it will be more human and you don’t have to read again

      Ive seen akin to this sentiment online and its very baffling

      • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh, they trained their ais off of that all right… And then filtered out all the stuff they didn’t like such as useful information.

      • Belgdore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I just assume that these people never have any problems that they have to solve personally. Otherwise they would be frustrated by the inability to find necessary information. They are either rich or children or both.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This may actually be a net improvement to the Google Search experience, since the engine is borderline unusable without uBlock Origin. But also it feels weird that Google would make an AI generated prompt the focal point and not the entire rows of sponsored ads that litter all search results.

    How did the big tech industry get this terminally stupid?

    • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      …the engine is borderline unusable without uBlock Origin.

      Chris, would you elaborate more on this experience?

      Update: Who’s Chris? Curse you, speech to text.

      • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not Chris, but it’s all the dang “sponsored” search results that populate when googling without using uBlock Origin.

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ive used UBO so long I forget regulwr people see a diffeent internet. Google results are still suffering.

          • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            This is exactly my case. Ads on apps as well. I completely forget that people have to see all that constantly.

            I wonder how much real estate that sponsored content takes. Then again, not enough to visit google and turn off UBO.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Update: Who’s Chris? Curse you, speech to text.

        Speech to text has gotten me into trouble so many times, it’s actually comical at this point.

        • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          😁 Me too. This was rare for me. FUTO with offline STT has been such a boon. I’m glad to be away from google’s gboard.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Almost every time I ask a direct question, the two AI answers almost always directly contradict each other. Yesterday I asked if vinegar cuts grease. I received explanations for both why its an excellent grease cutter, and why it doesn’t because it’s an acid.

    • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think this will be a major issue with AI. Just because it was trained on a huge wealth of knowledge doesn’t mean that it was trained on correct knowledge.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just because it was trained on a huge wealth of knowledge doesn’t mean that it was trained on correct knowledge.

        Which makes its correct answers and it’s confidently wrong answers look as plausible as each other. One needs to apply real intelligence to determine which to trust, makikg the AI tool mostly useless.

      • sc_griffith@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t see any reason being trained on writing informed by correct knowledge would cause it to be correct frequently. unless you’re expecting it to just verbatim lift sentences from training data

    • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Showing different viewpoints in order to not appear biased. It’s the cornerstone of democracy after all.

      😛

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, you can cure cancer according to the results…

    1. Dr Williams Oz. Cancer pill center 3)I ate a corn dog and it cured my can…
    2. research into cancer cures has come u…
    3. at McDonald’s we too have canc…
    4. the best cancer cures by Motley Fo…
    5. top 20 best ways to iPhone your canc…
  • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It should be illegal to force people to use generative ai to do things it is not needed for.
    Seeing Microsoft’s plans to add ai to windows was the last straw that made me change to linux.

    • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ecosia added ai chat which I think runs on the same thing as copilot. I don’t see the point though and would like to be able to hide the ai chat option.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Half the top results are usually AI generated garbage anyway, don’t see how a little more is going to hurt…

  • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    I got a Google Gemini “text message” in Google messages today. I couldn’t find a way to turn it off, so I just blocked and reported it as spam lol

  • eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lol. The generated result that is incomplete and slower than the rest of the search. I usually scroll past it because it’s not done generating. If it does generate fast enough, it’s usually too vague or broad

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh, Google though their search results weren’t crappy enough, so the decided to make them even worse.